An argumentation framework with backing and undercutting
In this work we will combine two important notions for the argumentation community into Abstract Argumentation Frameworks (AFs). These notions correspond to Toulmin’s backings and Pollock’s undercutting defeaters. We will define Backing-Undercutting Argumentation Frameworks (BUAFs), an extension of...
Guardado en:
Autores principales: | , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Objeto de conferencia |
Lenguaje: | Inglés |
Publicado: |
2011
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | http://sedici.unlp.edu.ar/handle/10915/18573 |
Aporte de: |
id |
I19-R120-10915-18573 |
---|---|
record_format |
dspace |
institution |
Universidad Nacional de La Plata |
institution_str |
I-19 |
repository_str |
R-120 |
collection |
SEDICI (UNLP) |
language |
Inglés |
topic |
Ciencias Informáticas Frameworks abstract argumentation frameworks (AFs); Toulmin’s backings; Pollock’s undercutting defeaters; backing-undercutting argumentation frameworks (BUAFs) |
spellingShingle |
Ciencias Informáticas Frameworks abstract argumentation frameworks (AFs); Toulmin’s backings; Pollock’s undercutting defeaters; backing-undercutting argumentation frameworks (BUAFs) Cohen, Andrea García, Alejandro Javier Simari, Guillermo Ricardo An argumentation framework with backing and undercutting |
topic_facet |
Ciencias Informáticas Frameworks abstract argumentation frameworks (AFs); Toulmin’s backings; Pollock’s undercutting defeaters; backing-undercutting argumentation frameworks (BUAFs) |
description |
In this work we will combine two important notions for the argumentation community into Abstract Argumentation Frameworks (AFs). These notions correspond to Toulmin’s backings and Pollock’s undercutting defeaters. We will define Backing-Undercutting Argumentation Frameworks (BUAFs), an extension of AFs that includes a specialized support relation, a distinction between different attack types, and a preference relation among arguments. Thus, BUAFs will provide a more concrete approach to represent argumentative or non-monotonic scenarios where information can be attacked and supported |
format |
Objeto de conferencia Objeto de conferencia |
author |
Cohen, Andrea García, Alejandro Javier Simari, Guillermo Ricardo |
author_facet |
Cohen, Andrea García, Alejandro Javier Simari, Guillermo Ricardo |
author_sort |
Cohen, Andrea |
title |
An argumentation framework with backing and undercutting |
title_short |
An argumentation framework with backing and undercutting |
title_full |
An argumentation framework with backing and undercutting |
title_fullStr |
An argumentation framework with backing and undercutting |
title_full_unstemmed |
An argumentation framework with backing and undercutting |
title_sort |
argumentation framework with backing and undercutting |
publishDate |
2011 |
url |
http://sedici.unlp.edu.ar/handle/10915/18573 |
work_keys_str_mv |
AT cohenandrea anargumentationframeworkwithbackingandundercutting AT garciaalejandrojavier anargumentationframeworkwithbackingandundercutting AT simariguillermoricardo anargumentationframeworkwithbackingandundercutting AT cohenandrea argumentationframeworkwithbackingandundercutting AT garciaalejandrojavier argumentationframeworkwithbackingandundercutting AT simariguillermoricardo argumentationframeworkwithbackingandundercutting |
bdutipo_str |
Repositorios |
_version_ |
1764820463067856898 |