An argumentation framework with backing and undercutting

In this work we will combine two important notions for the argumentation community into Abstract Argumentation Frameworks (AFs). These notions correspond to Toulmin’s backings and Pollock’s undercutting defeaters. We will define Backing-Undercutting Argumentation Frameworks (BUAFs), an extension of...

Descripción completa

Guardado en:
Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Cohen, Andrea, García, Alejandro Javier, Simari, Guillermo Ricardo
Formato: Objeto de conferencia
Lenguaje:Inglés
Publicado: 2011
Materias:
Ciencias Informáticas
Frameworks
abstract argumentation frameworks (AFs); Toulmin’s backings; Pollock’s undercutting defeaters; backing-undercutting argumentation frameworks (BUAFs)
Acceso en línea:http://sedici.unlp.edu.ar/handle/10915/18573
Aporte de:
SEDICI (UNLP) de Universidad Nacional de La Plata
id I19-R120-10915-18573
record_format dspace
institution Universidad Nacional de La Plata
institution_str I-19
repository_str R-120
collection SEDICI (UNLP)
language Inglés
topic Ciencias Informáticas
Frameworks
abstract argumentation frameworks (AFs); Toulmin’s backings; Pollock’s undercutting defeaters; backing-undercutting argumentation frameworks (BUAFs)
spellingShingle Ciencias Informáticas
Frameworks
abstract argumentation frameworks (AFs); Toulmin’s backings; Pollock’s undercutting defeaters; backing-undercutting argumentation frameworks (BUAFs)
Cohen, Andrea
García, Alejandro Javier
Simari, Guillermo Ricardo
An argumentation framework with backing and undercutting
topic_facet Ciencias Informáticas
Frameworks
abstract argumentation frameworks (AFs); Toulmin’s backings; Pollock’s undercutting defeaters; backing-undercutting argumentation frameworks (BUAFs)
description In this work we will combine two important notions for the argumentation community into Abstract Argumentation Frameworks (AFs). These notions correspond to Toulmin’s backings and Pollock’s undercutting defeaters. We will define Backing-Undercutting Argumentation Frameworks (BUAFs), an extension of AFs that includes a specialized support relation, a distinction between different attack types, and a preference relation among arguments. Thus, BUAFs will provide a more concrete approach to represent argumentative or non-monotonic scenarios where information can be attacked and supported
format Objeto de conferencia
Objeto de conferencia
author Cohen, Andrea
García, Alejandro Javier
Simari, Guillermo Ricardo
author_facet Cohen, Andrea
García, Alejandro Javier
Simari, Guillermo Ricardo
author_sort Cohen, Andrea
title An argumentation framework with backing and undercutting
title_short An argumentation framework with backing and undercutting
title_full An argumentation framework with backing and undercutting
title_fullStr An argumentation framework with backing and undercutting
title_full_unstemmed An argumentation framework with backing and undercutting
title_sort argumentation framework with backing and undercutting
publishDate 2011
url http://sedici.unlp.edu.ar/handle/10915/18573
work_keys_str_mv AT cohenandrea anargumentationframeworkwithbackingandundercutting
AT garciaalejandrojavier anargumentationframeworkwithbackingandundercutting
AT simariguillermoricardo anargumentationframeworkwithbackingandundercutting
AT cohenandrea argumentationframeworkwithbackingandundercutting
AT garciaalejandrojavier argumentationframeworkwithbackingandundercutting
AT simariguillermoricardo argumentationframeworkwithbackingandundercutting
bdutipo_str Repositorios
_version_ 1764820463067856898

Ejemplares similares