Aporia and action in Euripides’ <i>Iphigeneia at Aulis</i>

Tragedy, Aristotle tells us, is a mimēsis of a praxis. Euripides’ Iphigeneia at Aulis not only imitates an action: it is an exploration of the very possibility of action, both dramatic and political. Produced posthumously in the Spring of 405 BCE, the play is structured by aporia, a paralysis of pol...

Descripción completa

Guardado en:
Detalles Bibliográficos
Autor principal: Wohl, Victoria
Formato: Objeto de conferencia Resumen
Lenguaje:Español
Publicado: 2015
Materias:
Acceso en línea:http://sedici.unlp.edu.ar/handle/10915/55544
http://coloquiointernacionalceh.fahce.unlp.edu.ar/conferencias/Victoria%20Wohl.pdf
Aporte de:
id I19-R120-10915-55544
record_format dspace
institution Universidad Nacional de La Plata
institution_str I-19
repository_str R-120
collection SEDICI (UNLP)
language Español
topic Humanidades
Letras
Mundo Griego
Drama
Filosofía
tragedy
Euripides
Iphigeneia at Aulis
aporia
action
spellingShingle Humanidades
Letras
Mundo Griego
Drama
Filosofía
tragedy
Euripides
Iphigeneia at Aulis
aporia
action
Wohl, Victoria
Aporia and action in Euripides’ <i>Iphigeneia at Aulis</i>
topic_facet Humanidades
Letras
Mundo Griego
Drama
Filosofía
tragedy
Euripides
Iphigeneia at Aulis
aporia
action
description Tragedy, Aristotle tells us, is a mimēsis of a praxis. Euripides’ Iphigeneia at Aulis not only imitates an action: it is an exploration of the very possibility of action, both dramatic and political. Produced posthumously in the Spring of 405 BCE, the play is structured by aporia, a paralysis of political will that also paralyzes the plot and threatens to unwrite reality itself. The play attempts to loosen this bind by rooting political decision in the individual will of an autonomous agent, first Agamemnon, then Iphigeneia. But this process fails: the play’s many and notorious changes of mind identify decision as the political act par excellence, but also represent the moment of decision as a madness (in Kierkegaard’s phrase), as the agent, far from generating his or her own act, is subsumed and obliterated by it. The dramatic aporia resolved by the character’s choice is merely shifted to that choice itself, which exposes the mysterious gap between praxis and prattōn. Moreover, to the extent that the play succeeds in suturing action to an agent, that individual agent – simultaneously savior and scapegoat – effaces the collective deliberation of democratic politics: real political agency is replaced by the fantasy of a super-subject who will act on behalf of and in place of the demos. Staging praxis as a problem, the play’s mimēsis becomes a meditation on the failure of political agency and of democratic politics
format Objeto de conferencia
Resumen
author Wohl, Victoria
author_facet Wohl, Victoria
author_sort Wohl, Victoria
title Aporia and action in Euripides’ <i>Iphigeneia at Aulis</i>
title_short Aporia and action in Euripides’ <i>Iphigeneia at Aulis</i>
title_full Aporia and action in Euripides’ <i>Iphigeneia at Aulis</i>
title_fullStr Aporia and action in Euripides’ <i>Iphigeneia at Aulis</i>
title_full_unstemmed Aporia and action in Euripides’ <i>Iphigeneia at Aulis</i>
title_sort aporia and action in euripides’ <i>iphigeneia at aulis</i>
publishDate 2015
url http://sedici.unlp.edu.ar/handle/10915/55544
http://coloquiointernacionalceh.fahce.unlp.edu.ar/conferencias/Victoria%20Wohl.pdf
work_keys_str_mv AT wohlvictoria aporiaandactionineuripidesiiphigeneiaataulisi
bdutipo_str Repositorios
_version_ 1764820477007626241