Reasoning with inconsistent possibilistic description logics ontologies with disjunctive assertions

We present a preliminary framework for reasoning with possibilistic description logics ontologies with disjunctive assertions (PoDLoDA ontologies for short). Given a PoDLoDA ontology, its terminological box is expressed in the description logic programming fragment but its assertional box allows fou...

Descripción completa

Guardado en:
Detalles Bibliográficos
Autor principal: Gómez, Sergio Alejandro
Formato: Articulo
Lenguaje:Inglés
Publicado: 2015
Materias:
Acceso en línea:http://sedici.unlp.edu.ar/handle/10915/50127
http://journal.info.unlp.edu.ar/wp-content/uploads/JCST41-Paper-4.pdf
Aporte de:
id I19-R120-10915-50127
record_format dspace
institution Universidad Nacional de La Plata
institution_str I-19
repository_str R-120
collection SEDICI (UNLP)
language Inglés
topic Ciencias Informáticas
web semántica
Inteligencia Artificial
Frameworks
Knowledge Representation Formalisms and Methods
ontology reasoning
spellingShingle Ciencias Informáticas
web semántica
Inteligencia Artificial
Frameworks
Knowledge Representation Formalisms and Methods
ontology reasoning
Gómez, Sergio Alejandro
Reasoning with inconsistent possibilistic description logics ontologies with disjunctive assertions
topic_facet Ciencias Informáticas
web semántica
Inteligencia Artificial
Frameworks
Knowledge Representation Formalisms and Methods
ontology reasoning
description We present a preliminary framework for reasoning with possibilistic description logics ontologies with disjunctive assertions (PoDLoDA ontologies for short). Given a PoDLoDA ontology, its terminological box is expressed in the description logic programming fragment but its assertional box allows four kinds of statements: an individual is a member of a concept, two individuals are related through a role, an individual is a member of the union of two or more concepts or two individuals are related through the union of two or more roles. Axioms and statements in PoDLoDA ontologies have a numerical certainty degree attached. A disjunctive assertion expresses a doubt respect to the membership of either individuals to union of concepts or pairs of individuals to the union of roles. Because PoDLoDA ontologies allow to represent incomplete and potentially inconsistent information, instance checking is addressed through an adaptation of Bodanza’s Suppositional Argumentation System that allows to reason with modus ponens and constructive dilemmas. We think that our approach will be of use for implementers of reasoning systems in the Semantic Web where uncertainty of membership of individuals to concepts or roles is present.
format Articulo
Articulo
author Gómez, Sergio Alejandro
author_facet Gómez, Sergio Alejandro
author_sort Gómez, Sergio Alejandro
title Reasoning with inconsistent possibilistic description logics ontologies with disjunctive assertions
title_short Reasoning with inconsistent possibilistic description logics ontologies with disjunctive assertions
title_full Reasoning with inconsistent possibilistic description logics ontologies with disjunctive assertions
title_fullStr Reasoning with inconsistent possibilistic description logics ontologies with disjunctive assertions
title_full_unstemmed Reasoning with inconsistent possibilistic description logics ontologies with disjunctive assertions
title_sort reasoning with inconsistent possibilistic description logics ontologies with disjunctive assertions
publishDate 2015
url http://sedici.unlp.edu.ar/handle/10915/50127
http://journal.info.unlp.edu.ar/wp-content/uploads/JCST41-Paper-4.pdf
work_keys_str_mv AT gomezsergioalejandro reasoningwithinconsistentpossibilisticdescriptionlogicsontologieswithdisjunctiveassertions
bdutipo_str Repositorios
_version_ 1764820475511308290