La estructura sistemática del tesauro: indicadores para evaluar su calidad

Mostrar todas las versiones(4)

Four indicators are proposed to assess the quality of a thesaurus' systematic structure. This proposal considers that the specifications included in thesauri design and development standards, together with the principles of classification theory, represent the quality requirements to be met by...

Descripción completa

Guardado en:

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales:	Martínez Tamayo, Ana María, Ristuccia, Cristina Alicia, Stubbs, Edgardo Alberto, Valdez, Julia Catalina, Gamba, Viviana Lis, Mendes, Paola Verónica, Unzurrunzaga, Carolina, Caminotti, María Laura
Formato:	Articulo
Lenguaje:	Español
Publicado:	2011
Materias:	Humanidades Bibliotecología indicators quality systematic structure thesauri
Acceso en línea:	http://sedici.unlp.edu.ar/handle/10915/29081 http://redc.revistas.csic.es/index.php/redc/article/view/681
Aporte de:	SEDICI (UNLP) de Universidad Nacional de La Plata

id	I19-R120-10915-29081
record_format	dspace
institution	Universidad Nacional de La Plata
institution_str	I-19
repository_str	R-120
collection	SEDICI (UNLP)
language	Español
topic	Humanidades Bibliotecología indicators quality systematic structure thesauri
spellingShingle	Humanidades Bibliotecología indicators quality systematic structure thesauri Martínez Tamayo, Ana María Ristuccia, Cristina Alicia Stubbs, Edgardo Alberto Valdez, Julia Catalina Gamba, Viviana Lis Mendes, Paola Verónica Unzurrunzaga, Carolina Caminotti, María Laura La estructura sistemática del tesauro: indicadores para evaluar su calidad
topic_facet	Humanidades Bibliotecología indicators quality systematic structure thesauri
description	Four indicators are proposed to assess the quality of a thesaurus' systematic structure. This proposal considers that the specifications included in thesauri design and development standards, together with the principles of classification theory, represent the quality requirements to be met by the inherent characteristics of a thesaurus. The characteristics that do not meet the requirements are considered nonconformities. Four indicators are proposed to measure nonconformities, and were tested in three thesauri in Spanish. The results (i.e., nonconformities) were: 1) Percentage of preferred terms designating more than one concept: 10,8 % for DeCS, 7,3 % Spines and 10,9 % Unesco. 2) Percentage of preferred terms without a hierarchical relation: 0 DeCS, 1,4 % Spines and 1,1 % Unesco. 3) Percentage of preferred terms with more than one broader term: 53,8 % DeCS, 14,9 % Spines, 0 Unesco. 4) Percentage of preferred terms with only one narrower term: 13,5 % DeCS, 3,5 % Spines, 10,3 % Unesco. We conclude that the proposed indicators can be useful for assessing the quality of a thesaurus' systematic structure during the design and development processes.
format	Articulo Articulo
author	Martínez Tamayo, Ana María Ristuccia, Cristina Alicia Stubbs, Edgardo Alberto Valdez, Julia Catalina Gamba, Viviana Lis Mendes, Paola Verónica Unzurrunzaga, Carolina Caminotti, María Laura
author_facet	Martínez Tamayo, Ana María Ristuccia, Cristina Alicia Stubbs, Edgardo Alberto Valdez, Julia Catalina Gamba, Viviana Lis Mendes, Paola Verónica Unzurrunzaga, Carolina Caminotti, María Laura
author_sort	Martínez Tamayo, Ana María
title	La estructura sistemática del tesauro: indicadores para evaluar su calidad
title_short	La estructura sistemática del tesauro: indicadores para evaluar su calidad
title_full	La estructura sistemática del tesauro: indicadores para evaluar su calidad
title_fullStr	La estructura sistemática del tesauro: indicadores para evaluar su calidad
title_full_unstemmed	La estructura sistemática del tesauro: indicadores para evaluar su calidad
title_sort	la estructura sistemática del tesauro: indicadores para evaluar su calidad
publishDate	2011
url	http://sedici.unlp.edu.ar/handle/10915/29081 http://redc.revistas.csic.es/index.php/redc/article/view/681
work_keys_str_mv	AT martineztamayoanamaria laestructurasistematicadeltesauroindicadoresparaevaluarsucalidad AT ristucciacristinaalicia laestructurasistematicadeltesauroindicadoresparaevaluarsucalidad AT stubbsedgardoalberto laestructurasistematicadeltesauroindicadoresparaevaluarsucalidad AT valdezjuliacatalina laestructurasistematicadeltesauroindicadoresparaevaluarsucalidad AT gambavivianalis laestructurasistematicadeltesauroindicadoresparaevaluarsucalidad AT mendespaolaveronica laestructurasistematicadeltesauroindicadoresparaevaluarsucalidad AT unzurrunzagacarolina laestructurasistematicadeltesauroindicadoresparaevaluarsucalidad AT caminottimarialaura laestructurasistematicadeltesauroindicadoresparaevaluarsucalidad AT martineztamayoanamaria thesystematicstructureofathesaurusindicatorsforqualityassessment AT ristucciacristinaalicia thesystematicstructureofathesaurusindicatorsforqualityassessment AT stubbsedgardoalberto thesystematicstructureofathesaurusindicatorsforqualityassessment AT valdezjuliacatalina thesystematicstructureofathesaurusindicatorsforqualityassessment AT gambavivianalis thesystematicstructureofathesaurusindicatorsforqualityassessment AT mendespaolaveronica thesystematicstructureofathesaurusindicatorsforqualityassessment AT unzurrunzagacarolina thesystematicstructureofathesaurusindicatorsforqualityassessment AT caminottimarialaura thesystematicstructureofathesaurusindicatorsforqualityassessment
bdutipo_str	Repositorios
_version_	1764820467779108866

La estructura sistemática del tesauro: indicadores para evaluar su calidad

Ejemplares similares