Reliability and validity of the psychopathy checklist-revised in the assessment of risk for institutional violence : A cautionary note on DeMatteo et al. (2020)
A group of 12 authors (GA) shared a statement of concern (SoC) warning against the use of the <i>Hare Psychopathy Checklist-Revised</i> (PCL-R; Hare, 1991, 2003) to assess risk for serious institutional violence in US capital sentencing cases (DeMatteo et al., 2020). Notably, the SoC was...
Guardado en:
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Articulo Preprint |
Lenguaje: | Inglés |
Publicado: |
2020
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | http://sedici.unlp.edu.ar/handle/10915/125366 |
Aporte de: |
id |
I19-R120-10915-125366 |
---|---|
record_format |
dspace |
institution |
Universidad Nacional de La Plata |
institution_str |
I-19 |
repository_str |
R-120 |
collection |
SEDICI (UNLP) |
language |
Inglés |
topic |
Psiquiatría Ciencias Médicas PCL-R Psychopathy Capital sentencing field reliability predictive validity institutional violence |
spellingShingle |
Psiquiatría Ciencias Médicas PCL-R Psychopathy Capital sentencing field reliability predictive validity institutional violence Olver, Mark Stockdale, Keira Neumann, Craig Hare, Robert Mokros, Andreas Baskin Sommers, Arielle Brand, Eddy Folino, Jorge Oscar Gacono, Carl Gray, Nicola S. Kiehl, Kent Knight, Raymond León Mayer, Elizabeth M. Logan, Matt Reid Meloy, J. Roy, Sandeep Salekin, Randy T. Snowden, Robert Thomson, Nicholas Tillem, Scott Vitacco, Michael Yoon, Dahlnym Reliability and validity of the psychopathy checklist-revised in the assessment of risk for institutional violence : A cautionary note on DeMatteo et al. (2020) |
topic_facet |
Psiquiatría Ciencias Médicas PCL-R Psychopathy Capital sentencing field reliability predictive validity institutional violence |
description |
A group of 12 authors (GA) shared a statement of concern (SoC) warning against the use of the <i>Hare Psychopathy Checklist-Revised</i> (PCL-R; Hare, 1991, 2003) to assess risk for serious institutional violence in US capital sentencing cases (DeMatteo et al., 2020). Notably, the SoC was not confined to capital sentencing issues, but included institutional violence in general. Central to the arguments presented in the SoC was that the PCL-R has poor predictive validity for institutional violence and also inadequate field reliability. The GA also identified important issues about the fallibility and inappropriate use of any clinical/forensic assessments, questionable evaluator qualifications, and their effects on capital sentencing decisions. However, as a group of forensic academics, researchers, and clinicians, we are concerned that the PCL-R represents a psycholegal red herring, while the SoC did not address critical legislative, systemic, and evaluator/rating issues that affect <i>all risk assessment tools</i>. We contend that the SoC’s literature review was selective and that the resultant opinions about potential uses and misuses of the PCL-R were ultimately misleading. We focus our response on the evidence and conclusions proffered by the GA concerning the use of the PCL-R in capital and other cases. We provide new empirical findings regarding the PCL-R’s predictive validity and field reliability to further demonstrate its relevance for institutional violence risk assessment and management. We further demonstrate why the argument that group data cannot be relevant for single-case assessments is erroneous. Recommendations to support the ethical and appropriate use of the PCL-R for risk assessment are provided. |
format |
Articulo Preprint |
author |
Olver, Mark Stockdale, Keira Neumann, Craig Hare, Robert Mokros, Andreas Baskin Sommers, Arielle Brand, Eddy Folino, Jorge Oscar Gacono, Carl Gray, Nicola S. Kiehl, Kent Knight, Raymond León Mayer, Elizabeth M. Logan, Matt Reid Meloy, J. Roy, Sandeep Salekin, Randy T. Snowden, Robert Thomson, Nicholas Tillem, Scott Vitacco, Michael Yoon, Dahlnym |
author_facet |
Olver, Mark Stockdale, Keira Neumann, Craig Hare, Robert Mokros, Andreas Baskin Sommers, Arielle Brand, Eddy Folino, Jorge Oscar Gacono, Carl Gray, Nicola S. Kiehl, Kent Knight, Raymond León Mayer, Elizabeth M. Logan, Matt Reid Meloy, J. Roy, Sandeep Salekin, Randy T. Snowden, Robert Thomson, Nicholas Tillem, Scott Vitacco, Michael Yoon, Dahlnym |
author_sort |
Olver, Mark |
title |
Reliability and validity of the psychopathy checklist-revised in the assessment of risk for institutional violence : A cautionary note on DeMatteo et al. (2020) |
title_short |
Reliability and validity of the psychopathy checklist-revised in the assessment of risk for institutional violence : A cautionary note on DeMatteo et al. (2020) |
title_full |
Reliability and validity of the psychopathy checklist-revised in the assessment of risk for institutional violence : A cautionary note on DeMatteo et al. (2020) |
title_fullStr |
Reliability and validity of the psychopathy checklist-revised in the assessment of risk for institutional violence : A cautionary note on DeMatteo et al. (2020) |
title_full_unstemmed |
Reliability and validity of the psychopathy checklist-revised in the assessment of risk for institutional violence : A cautionary note on DeMatteo et al. (2020) |
title_sort |
reliability and validity of the psychopathy checklist-revised in the assessment of risk for institutional violence : a cautionary note on dematteo et al. (2020) |
publishDate |
2020 |
url |
http://sedici.unlp.edu.ar/handle/10915/125366 |
work_keys_str_mv |
AT olvermark reliabilityandvalidityofthepsychopathychecklistrevisedintheassessmentofriskforinstitutionalviolenceacautionarynoteondematteoetal2020 AT stockdalekeira reliabilityandvalidityofthepsychopathychecklistrevisedintheassessmentofriskforinstitutionalviolenceacautionarynoteondematteoetal2020 AT neumanncraig reliabilityandvalidityofthepsychopathychecklistrevisedintheassessmentofriskforinstitutionalviolenceacautionarynoteondematteoetal2020 AT harerobert reliabilityandvalidityofthepsychopathychecklistrevisedintheassessmentofriskforinstitutionalviolenceacautionarynoteondematteoetal2020 AT mokrosandreas reliabilityandvalidityofthepsychopathychecklistrevisedintheassessmentofriskforinstitutionalviolenceacautionarynoteondematteoetal2020 AT baskinsommersarielle reliabilityandvalidityofthepsychopathychecklistrevisedintheassessmentofriskforinstitutionalviolenceacautionarynoteondematteoetal2020 AT brandeddy reliabilityandvalidityofthepsychopathychecklistrevisedintheassessmentofriskforinstitutionalviolenceacautionarynoteondematteoetal2020 AT folinojorgeoscar reliabilityandvalidityofthepsychopathychecklistrevisedintheassessmentofriskforinstitutionalviolenceacautionarynoteondematteoetal2020 AT gaconocarl reliabilityandvalidityofthepsychopathychecklistrevisedintheassessmentofriskforinstitutionalviolenceacautionarynoteondematteoetal2020 AT graynicolas reliabilityandvalidityofthepsychopathychecklistrevisedintheassessmentofriskforinstitutionalviolenceacautionarynoteondematteoetal2020 AT kiehlkent reliabilityandvalidityofthepsychopathychecklistrevisedintheassessmentofriskforinstitutionalviolenceacautionarynoteondematteoetal2020 AT knightraymond reliabilityandvalidityofthepsychopathychecklistrevisedintheassessmentofriskforinstitutionalviolenceacautionarynoteondematteoetal2020 AT leonmayerelizabethm reliabilityandvalidityofthepsychopathychecklistrevisedintheassessmentofriskforinstitutionalviolenceacautionarynoteondematteoetal2020 AT loganmatt reliabilityandvalidityofthepsychopathychecklistrevisedintheassessmentofriskforinstitutionalviolenceacautionarynoteondematteoetal2020 AT reidmeloyj reliabilityandvalidityofthepsychopathychecklistrevisedintheassessmentofriskforinstitutionalviolenceacautionarynoteondematteoetal2020 AT roysandeep reliabilityandvalidityofthepsychopathychecklistrevisedintheassessmentofriskforinstitutionalviolenceacautionarynoteondematteoetal2020 AT salekinrandyt reliabilityandvalidityofthepsychopathychecklistrevisedintheassessmentofriskforinstitutionalviolenceacautionarynoteondematteoetal2020 AT snowdenrobert reliabilityandvalidityofthepsychopathychecklistrevisedintheassessmentofriskforinstitutionalviolenceacautionarynoteondematteoetal2020 AT thomsonnicholas reliabilityandvalidityofthepsychopathychecklistrevisedintheassessmentofriskforinstitutionalviolenceacautionarynoteondematteoetal2020 AT tillemscott reliabilityandvalidityofthepsychopathychecklistrevisedintheassessmentofriskforinstitutionalviolenceacautionarynoteondematteoetal2020 AT vitaccomichael reliabilityandvalidityofthepsychopathychecklistrevisedintheassessmentofriskforinstitutionalviolenceacautionarynoteondematteoetal2020 AT yoondahlnym reliabilityandvalidityofthepsychopathychecklistrevisedintheassessmentofriskforinstitutionalviolenceacautionarynoteondematteoetal2020 |
bdutipo_str |
Repositorios |
_version_ |
1764820451559735298 |