A karyotype comparison between two species of bordered plant bugs (hemiptera, heteroptera, largidae) by conventional chromosome staining, c-banding and rDNA-FISH

A cytogenetic characterization, including heterochromatin content, and the analysis of the location of rDNA genes, was performed in Largus fasciatus Blanchard, 1843 and L. Rufipennis Laporte, 1832. Mitotic and meiotic analyses revealed the same diploid chromosome number 2n = 12 + X0/XX (male/female)...

Descripción completa

Guardado en:

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales:	Salanitro, L.B., Massaccesi, A.C., Urbisaglia, S., Bressa, M.J., Chirino, M.G.
Formato:	JOUR
Materias:	C-banding Heteroptera Holokinetic chromosomes Karyotype comparison Largus RDNA-FISH
Acceso en línea:	http://hdl.handle.net/20.500.12110/paper_19930771_v11_n2_p239_Salanitro
Aporte de:	Biblioteca Digital - Facultad de Ciencias Exactas y Naturales (UBA) de Universidad de Buenos Aires

id	todo:paper_19930771_v11_n2_p239_Salanitro
record_format	dspace
spelling	todo:paper_19930771_v11_n2_p239_Salanitro2023-10-03T16:37:31Z A karyotype comparison between two species of bordered plant bugs (hemiptera, heteroptera, largidae) by conventional chromosome staining, c-banding and rDNA-FISH Salanitro, L.B. Massaccesi, A.C. Urbisaglia, S. Bressa, M.J. Chirino, M.G. C-banding Heteroptera Holokinetic chromosomes Karyotype comparison Largus RDNA-FISH A cytogenetic characterization, including heterochromatin content, and the analysis of the location of rDNA genes, was performed in Largus fasciatus Blanchard, 1843 and L. Rufipennis Laporte, 1832. Mitotic and meiotic analyses revealed the same diploid chromosome number 2n = 12 + X0/XX (male/female). Heterochromatin content, very scarce in both species, revealed C-blocks at both ends of autosomes and X chromosome. The most remarkable cytological feature observed between both species was the different chromosome position of the NORs. This analysis allowed us to use the NORs as a cytological marker because two clusters of rDNA genes are located at one end of one pair of autosomes in L. Fasciatus, whereas a single rDNA cluster is located at one terminal region of the X chromosome in L. Rufipennis. Taking into account our results and previous data obtained in other heteropteran species, the conventional staining, chromosome bandings, and rDNA-FISH provide important chromosome markers for cytotaxonomy, karyotype evolution, and chromosome structure and organization studies. © 2017. Leonardo Luís Artico et al. All reights reserved. Fil:Bressa, M.J. Universidad de Buenos Aires. Facultad de Ciencias Exactas y Naturales; Argentina. JOUR info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.5/ar http://hdl.handle.net/20.500.12110/paper_19930771_v11_n2_p239_Salanitro
institution	Universidad de Buenos Aires
institution_str	I-28
repository_str	R-134
collection	Biblioteca Digital - Facultad de Ciencias Exactas y Naturales (UBA)
topic	C-banding Heteroptera Holokinetic chromosomes Karyotype comparison Largus RDNA-FISH
spellingShingle	C-banding Heteroptera Holokinetic chromosomes Karyotype comparison Largus RDNA-FISH Salanitro, L.B. Massaccesi, A.C. Urbisaglia, S. Bressa, M.J. Chirino, M.G. A karyotype comparison between two species of bordered plant bugs (hemiptera, heteroptera, largidae) by conventional chromosome staining, c-banding and rDNA-FISH
topic_facet	C-banding Heteroptera Holokinetic chromosomes Karyotype comparison Largus RDNA-FISH
description	A cytogenetic characterization, including heterochromatin content, and the analysis of the location of rDNA genes, was performed in Largus fasciatus Blanchard, 1843 and L. Rufipennis Laporte, 1832. Mitotic and meiotic analyses revealed the same diploid chromosome number 2n = 12 + X0/XX (male/female). Heterochromatin content, very scarce in both species, revealed C-blocks at both ends of autosomes and X chromosome. The most remarkable cytological feature observed between both species was the different chromosome position of the NORs. This analysis allowed us to use the NORs as a cytological marker because two clusters of rDNA genes are located at one end of one pair of autosomes in L. Fasciatus, whereas a single rDNA cluster is located at one terminal region of the X chromosome in L. Rufipennis. Taking into account our results and previous data obtained in other heteropteran species, the conventional staining, chromosome bandings, and rDNA-FISH provide important chromosome markers for cytotaxonomy, karyotype evolution, and chromosome structure and organization studies. © 2017. Leonardo Luís Artico et al. All reights reserved.
format	JOUR
author	Salanitro, L.B. Massaccesi, A.C. Urbisaglia, S. Bressa, M.J. Chirino, M.G.
author_facet	Salanitro, L.B. Massaccesi, A.C. Urbisaglia, S. Bressa, M.J. Chirino, M.G.
author_sort	Salanitro, L.B.
title	A karyotype comparison between two species of bordered plant bugs (hemiptera, heteroptera, largidae) by conventional chromosome staining, c-banding and rDNA-FISH
title_short	A karyotype comparison between two species of bordered plant bugs (hemiptera, heteroptera, largidae) by conventional chromosome staining, c-banding and rDNA-FISH
title_full	A karyotype comparison between two species of bordered plant bugs (hemiptera, heteroptera, largidae) by conventional chromosome staining, c-banding and rDNA-FISH
title_fullStr	A karyotype comparison between two species of bordered plant bugs (hemiptera, heteroptera, largidae) by conventional chromosome staining, c-banding and rDNA-FISH
title_full_unstemmed	A karyotype comparison between two species of bordered plant bugs (hemiptera, heteroptera, largidae) by conventional chromosome staining, c-banding and rDNA-FISH
title_sort	karyotype comparison between two species of bordered plant bugs (hemiptera, heteroptera, largidae) by conventional chromosome staining, c-banding and rdna-fish
url	http://hdl.handle.net/20.500.12110/paper_19930771_v11_n2_p239_Salanitro
work_keys_str_mv	AT salanitrolb akaryotypecomparisonbetweentwospeciesofborderedplantbugshemipteraheteropteralargidaebyconventionalchromosomestainingcbandingandrdnafish AT massaccesiac akaryotypecomparisonbetweentwospeciesofborderedplantbugshemipteraheteropteralargidaebyconventionalchromosomestainingcbandingandrdnafish AT urbisaglias akaryotypecomparisonbetweentwospeciesofborderedplantbugshemipteraheteropteralargidaebyconventionalchromosomestainingcbandingandrdnafish AT bressamj akaryotypecomparisonbetweentwospeciesofborderedplantbugshemipteraheteropteralargidaebyconventionalchromosomestainingcbandingandrdnafish AT chirinomg akaryotypecomparisonbetweentwospeciesofborderedplantbugshemipteraheteropteralargidaebyconventionalchromosomestainingcbandingandrdnafish AT salanitrolb karyotypecomparisonbetweentwospeciesofborderedplantbugshemipteraheteropteralargidaebyconventionalchromosomestainingcbandingandrdnafish AT massaccesiac karyotypecomparisonbetweentwospeciesofborderedplantbugshemipteraheteropteralargidaebyconventionalchromosomestainingcbandingandrdnafish AT urbisaglias karyotypecomparisonbetweentwospeciesofborderedplantbugshemipteraheteropteralargidaebyconventionalchromosomestainingcbandingandrdnafish AT bressamj karyotypecomparisonbetweentwospeciesofborderedplantbugshemipteraheteropteralargidaebyconventionalchromosomestainingcbandingandrdnafish AT chirinomg karyotypecomparisonbetweentwospeciesofborderedplantbugshemipteraheteropteralargidaebyconventionalchromosomestainingcbandingandrdnafish
_version_	1807321819051458560

A karyotype comparison between two species of bordered plant bugs (hemiptera, heteroptera, largidae) by conventional chromosome staining, c-banding and rDNA-FISH

Ejemplares similares