Prey selection by larvae of Prochilodus lineatus (Pisces: Curimatidae): Indigenous zooplankton versus veligers of the introduced bivalve Limnoperna fortunei (Bivalvia: Mitilidae)

We studied experimentally the feeding selectivity of larvae of Prochilodus lineatus (Pisces), with particular emphasis on the role of veligers of the exotic bivalve Limnoperna fortunei. Three concentrations of veligers were offered to three developmental stages of P. lineatus. Veliger concentrations...

Descripción completa

Guardado en:
Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Paolucci, E.M., Cataldo, D.H., Boltovskoy, D.
Formato: JOUR
Materias:
Acceso en línea:http://hdl.handle.net/20.500.12110/paper_13862588_v44_n1_p255_Paolucci
Aporte de:
id todo:paper_13862588_v44_n1_p255_Paolucci
record_format dspace
spelling todo:paper_13862588_v44_n1_p255_Paolucci2023-10-03T16:12:19Z Prey selection by larvae of Prochilodus lineatus (Pisces: Curimatidae): Indigenous zooplankton versus veligers of the introduced bivalve Limnoperna fortunei (Bivalvia: Mitilidae) Paolucci, E.M. Cataldo, D.H. Boltovskoy, D. Exotic bivalve Larval fish Limnoperna fortunei veligers Prey selection Prochilodus lineatus bivalve finfish flea food selection growth response introduced species larva prey selection zooplankton Bivalvia Copepoda Crustacea Curimatidae Limnoperna Limnoperna fortunei Pisces Prochilodus lineatus We studied experimentally the feeding selectivity of larvae of Prochilodus lineatus (Pisces), with particular emphasis on the role of veligers of the exotic bivalve Limnoperna fortunei. Three concentrations of veligers were offered to three developmental stages of P. lineatus. Veliger concentrations were: (1) higher than in the field ("enriched", 0. 09 ind. ml-1), (2) unmodified from field conditions ("normal", 0. 06 ind. ml-1), and (3) lower than in the field ("low", 0. 02 ind. ml-1). Fish developmental stages were protolarvae (approx. 10 days old), mesolarvae (17 days), and metalarvae (25 days). Proportions (in terms of numbers and biomass) and selectivity values were calculated for each prey item evaluated: veligers, small cladocerans + nauplii, medium-sized cladocerans, copepodits, and large cladocerans + copepods. Protolarvae and mesolarvae consumed veligers almost exclusively (88-90%, both in numbers and in biomass) when offered prey enriched in veligers, whereas for metalarvae veligers represented only 16. 0% of the food consumed. At lower veliger concentrations, only protolarvae preferred Limnoperna veligers, whereas older fishes switched gradually to crustacean plankton. We conclude that veligers are preferred by the early fish developmental stages, and we speculate that this may be because their slower swimming makes them easier to capture than planktonic crustaceans. However, as fish larvae grow larger, veligers become too small a prey for their energetic needs, and they switch to larger items like cladocerans and copepods. We anticipate that this new and abundant food resource has an important impact on the survival and growth of P. lineatus. © Springer Science+Business Media B.V. 2009. Fil:Paolucci, E.M. Universidad de Buenos Aires. Facultad de Ciencias Exactas y Naturales; Argentina. Fil:Cataldo, D.H. Universidad de Buenos Aires. Facultad de Ciencias Exactas y Naturales; Argentina. Fil:Boltovskoy, D. Universidad de Buenos Aires. Facultad de Ciencias Exactas y Naturales; Argentina. JOUR info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.5/ar http://hdl.handle.net/20.500.12110/paper_13862588_v44_n1_p255_Paolucci
institution Universidad de Buenos Aires
institution_str I-28
repository_str R-134
collection Biblioteca Digital - Facultad de Ciencias Exactas y Naturales (UBA)
topic Exotic bivalve
Larval fish
Limnoperna fortunei veligers
Prey selection
Prochilodus lineatus
bivalve
finfish
flea
food selection
growth response
introduced species
larva
prey selection
zooplankton
Bivalvia
Copepoda
Crustacea
Curimatidae
Limnoperna
Limnoperna fortunei
Pisces
Prochilodus lineatus
spellingShingle Exotic bivalve
Larval fish
Limnoperna fortunei veligers
Prey selection
Prochilodus lineatus
bivalve
finfish
flea
food selection
growth response
introduced species
larva
prey selection
zooplankton
Bivalvia
Copepoda
Crustacea
Curimatidae
Limnoperna
Limnoperna fortunei
Pisces
Prochilodus lineatus
Paolucci, E.M.
Cataldo, D.H.
Boltovskoy, D.
Prey selection by larvae of Prochilodus lineatus (Pisces: Curimatidae): Indigenous zooplankton versus veligers of the introduced bivalve Limnoperna fortunei (Bivalvia: Mitilidae)
topic_facet Exotic bivalve
Larval fish
Limnoperna fortunei veligers
Prey selection
Prochilodus lineatus
bivalve
finfish
flea
food selection
growth response
introduced species
larva
prey selection
zooplankton
Bivalvia
Copepoda
Crustacea
Curimatidae
Limnoperna
Limnoperna fortunei
Pisces
Prochilodus lineatus
description We studied experimentally the feeding selectivity of larvae of Prochilodus lineatus (Pisces), with particular emphasis on the role of veligers of the exotic bivalve Limnoperna fortunei. Three concentrations of veligers were offered to three developmental stages of P. lineatus. Veliger concentrations were: (1) higher than in the field ("enriched", 0. 09 ind. ml-1), (2) unmodified from field conditions ("normal", 0. 06 ind. ml-1), and (3) lower than in the field ("low", 0. 02 ind. ml-1). Fish developmental stages were protolarvae (approx. 10 days old), mesolarvae (17 days), and metalarvae (25 days). Proportions (in terms of numbers and biomass) and selectivity values were calculated for each prey item evaluated: veligers, small cladocerans + nauplii, medium-sized cladocerans, copepodits, and large cladocerans + copepods. Protolarvae and mesolarvae consumed veligers almost exclusively (88-90%, both in numbers and in biomass) when offered prey enriched in veligers, whereas for metalarvae veligers represented only 16. 0% of the food consumed. At lower veliger concentrations, only protolarvae preferred Limnoperna veligers, whereas older fishes switched gradually to crustacean plankton. We conclude that veligers are preferred by the early fish developmental stages, and we speculate that this may be because their slower swimming makes them easier to capture than planktonic crustaceans. However, as fish larvae grow larger, veligers become too small a prey for their energetic needs, and they switch to larger items like cladocerans and copepods. We anticipate that this new and abundant food resource has an important impact on the survival and growth of P. lineatus. © Springer Science+Business Media B.V. 2009.
format JOUR
author Paolucci, E.M.
Cataldo, D.H.
Boltovskoy, D.
author_facet Paolucci, E.M.
Cataldo, D.H.
Boltovskoy, D.
author_sort Paolucci, E.M.
title Prey selection by larvae of Prochilodus lineatus (Pisces: Curimatidae): Indigenous zooplankton versus veligers of the introduced bivalve Limnoperna fortunei (Bivalvia: Mitilidae)
title_short Prey selection by larvae of Prochilodus lineatus (Pisces: Curimatidae): Indigenous zooplankton versus veligers of the introduced bivalve Limnoperna fortunei (Bivalvia: Mitilidae)
title_full Prey selection by larvae of Prochilodus lineatus (Pisces: Curimatidae): Indigenous zooplankton versus veligers of the introduced bivalve Limnoperna fortunei (Bivalvia: Mitilidae)
title_fullStr Prey selection by larvae of Prochilodus lineatus (Pisces: Curimatidae): Indigenous zooplankton versus veligers of the introduced bivalve Limnoperna fortunei (Bivalvia: Mitilidae)
title_full_unstemmed Prey selection by larvae of Prochilodus lineatus (Pisces: Curimatidae): Indigenous zooplankton versus veligers of the introduced bivalve Limnoperna fortunei (Bivalvia: Mitilidae)
title_sort prey selection by larvae of prochilodus lineatus (pisces: curimatidae): indigenous zooplankton versus veligers of the introduced bivalve limnoperna fortunei (bivalvia: mitilidae)
url http://hdl.handle.net/20.500.12110/paper_13862588_v44_n1_p255_Paolucci
work_keys_str_mv AT paolucciem preyselectionbylarvaeofprochiloduslineatuspiscescurimatidaeindigenouszooplanktonversusveligersoftheintroducedbivalvelimnopernafortuneibivalviamitilidae
AT cataldodh preyselectionbylarvaeofprochiloduslineatuspiscescurimatidaeindigenouszooplanktonversusveligersoftheintroducedbivalvelimnopernafortuneibivalviamitilidae
AT boltovskoyd preyselectionbylarvaeofprochiloduslineatuspiscescurimatidaeindigenouszooplanktonversusveligersoftheintroducedbivalvelimnopernafortuneibivalviamitilidae
_version_ 1782029903994028032