Cage trapping and bait evaluation for the capture of alive individuals of Myocastor coypus

The goal of this study was to compare two types of cage traps designed for the capture of Myocastor coypus in order to bring adequate management tools for population studies of the species, without killing the animals. Capture efficiency (E), probability of capture, inefficacy (I) and selectivity (S...

Descripción completa

Guardado en:
Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Corriale, M.J., Arias, S.M., Porini, G.M., Bó, R.F.
Formato: JOUR
Materias:
Baits
Cage traps
Capture efficiency
Live trapping
Animalia
Myocastor coypus
Acceso en línea:http://hdl.handle.net/20.500.12110/paper_03279383_v15_n2_p173_Corriale
Aporte de:
Biblioteca Digital - Facultad de Ciencias Exactas y Naturales (UBA) de Universidad de Buenos Aires
id todo:paper_03279383_v15_n2_p173_Corriale
record_format dspace
spelling todo:paper_03279383_v15_n2_p173_Corriale2023-10-03T15:24:59Z Cage trapping and bait evaluation for the capture of alive individuals of Myocastor coypus Corriale, M.J. Arias, S.M. Porini, G.M. Bó, R.F. Baits Cage traps Capture efficiency Live trapping Animalia Myocastor coypus The goal of this study was to compare two types of cage traps designed for the capture of Myocastor coypus in order to bring adequate management tools for population studies of the species, without killing the animals. Capture efficiency (E), probability of capture, inefficacy (I) and selectivity (S) of the traps were analyzed. We also evaluate the preference for different types of bait. In six ponds of the Buenos Aires Golf Field removal captures were accomplished using traps of the "Tomahawk" type made with different meshes and baits. We evaluated selection and preference and we estimated traps' E, I, and S. We did not find any difference between cage trap types (p>0.05) nor bait (p>0.05). Means of E, I and S were 0.2, 0.07 and 0.97 respectively. Even if the E was low during this study, it was higher than the one obtained by other authors. Taking into account the low value obtained for I and the high S obtained for the trap, we consider that the methodology used is adequate to capture M. coypus, at least in similar conditions as the one present for this study. © SAREM, 2008. Fil:Corriale, M.J. Universidad de Buenos Aires. Facultad de Ciencias Exactas y Naturales; Argentina. JOUR info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.5/ar http://hdl.handle.net/20.500.12110/paper_03279383_v15_n2_p173_Corriale
institution Universidad de Buenos Aires
institution_str I-28
repository_str R-134
collection Biblioteca Digital - Facultad de Ciencias Exactas y Naturales (UBA)
topic Baits
Cage traps
Capture efficiency
Live trapping
Animalia
Myocastor coypus
spellingShingle Baits
Cage traps
Capture efficiency
Live trapping
Animalia
Myocastor coypus
Corriale, M.J.
Arias, S.M.
Porini, G.M.
Bó, R.F.
Cage trapping and bait evaluation for the capture of alive individuals of Myocastor coypus
topic_facet Baits
Cage traps
Capture efficiency
Live trapping
Animalia
Myocastor coypus
description The goal of this study was to compare two types of cage traps designed for the capture of Myocastor coypus in order to bring adequate management tools for population studies of the species, without killing the animals. Capture efficiency (E), probability of capture, inefficacy (I) and selectivity (S) of the traps were analyzed. We also evaluate the preference for different types of bait. In six ponds of the Buenos Aires Golf Field removal captures were accomplished using traps of the "Tomahawk" type made with different meshes and baits. We evaluated selection and preference and we estimated traps' E, I, and S. We did not find any difference between cage trap types (p>0.05) nor bait (p>0.05). Means of E, I and S were 0.2, 0.07 and 0.97 respectively. Even if the E was low during this study, it was higher than the one obtained by other authors. Taking into account the low value obtained for I and the high S obtained for the trap, we consider that the methodology used is adequate to capture M. coypus, at least in similar conditions as the one present for this study. © SAREM, 2008.
format JOUR
author Corriale, M.J.
Arias, S.M.
Porini, G.M.
Bó, R.F.
author_facet Corriale, M.J.
Arias, S.M.
Porini, G.M.
Bó, R.F.
author_sort Corriale, M.J.
title Cage trapping and bait evaluation for the capture of alive individuals of Myocastor coypus
title_short Cage trapping and bait evaluation for the capture of alive individuals of Myocastor coypus
title_full Cage trapping and bait evaluation for the capture of alive individuals of Myocastor coypus
title_fullStr Cage trapping and bait evaluation for the capture of alive individuals of Myocastor coypus
title_full_unstemmed Cage trapping and bait evaluation for the capture of alive individuals of Myocastor coypus
title_sort cage trapping and bait evaluation for the capture of alive individuals of myocastor coypus
url http://hdl.handle.net/20.500.12110/paper_03279383_v15_n2_p173_Corriale
work_keys_str_mv AT corrialemj cagetrappingandbaitevaluationforthecaptureofaliveindividualsofmyocastorcoypus
AT ariassm cagetrappingandbaitevaluationforthecaptureofaliveindividualsofmyocastorcoypus
AT porinigm cagetrappingandbaitevaluationforthecaptureofaliveindividualsofmyocastorcoypus
AT borf cagetrappingandbaitevaluationforthecaptureofaliveindividualsofmyocastorcoypus
_version_ 1807319026415697920

Ejemplares similares