25 Years of Self-organized Criticality: Numerical Detection Methods
The detection and characterization of self-organized criticality (SOC), in both real and simulated data, has undergone many significant revisions over the past 25 years. The explosive advances in the many numerical methods available for detecting, discriminating, and ultimately testing, SOC have pla...
Guardado en:
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | JOUR |
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | http://hdl.handle.net/20.500.12110/paper_00386308_v198_n1-4_p217_McAteer |
Aporte de: |
id |
todo:paper_00386308_v198_n1-4_p217_McAteer |
---|---|
record_format |
dspace |
spelling |
todo:paper_00386308_v198_n1-4_p217_McAteer2023-10-03T14:49:11Z 25 Years of Self-organized Criticality: Numerical Detection Methods McAteer, R.T.J. Aschwanden, M.J. Dimitropoulou, M. Georgoulis, M.K. Pruessner, G. Morales, L. Ireland, J. Abramenko, V. Numerical methods Self organized criticality Criticality (nuclear fission) Application-oriented Autocorrelation methods Comfort zone Detection methods Event detection Scientific researches Self-organized criticality Spatial temporals Numerical methods The detection and characterization of self-organized criticality (SOC), in both real and simulated data, has undergone many significant revisions over the past 25 years. The explosive advances in the many numerical methods available for detecting, discriminating, and ultimately testing, SOC have played a critical role in developing our understanding of how systems experience and exhibit SOC. In this article, methods of detecting SOC are reviewed; from correlations to complexity to critical quantities. A description of the basic autocorrelation method leads into a detailed analysis of application-oriented methods developed in the last 25 years. In the second half of this manuscript space-based, time-based and spatial-temporal methods are reviewed and the prevalence of power laws in nature is described, with an emphasis on event detection and characterization. The search for numerical methods to clearly and unambiguously detect SOC in data often leads us outside the comfort zone of our own disciplines—the answers to these questions are often obtained by studying the advances made in other fields of study. In addition, numerical detection methods often provide the optimum link between simulations and experiments in scientific research. We seek to explore this boundary where the rubber meets the road, to review this expanding field of research of numerical detection of SOC systems over the past 25 years, and to iterate forwards so as to provide some foresight and guidance into developing breakthroughs in this subject over the next quarter of a century. © 2015, Springer Science+Business Media Dordrecht. Fil:Morales, L. Universidad de Buenos Aires. Facultad de Ciencias Exactas y Naturales; Argentina. JOUR info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.5/ar http://hdl.handle.net/20.500.12110/paper_00386308_v198_n1-4_p217_McAteer |
institution |
Universidad de Buenos Aires |
institution_str |
I-28 |
repository_str |
R-134 |
collection |
Biblioteca Digital - Facultad de Ciencias Exactas y Naturales (UBA) |
topic |
Numerical methods Self organized criticality Criticality (nuclear fission) Application-oriented Autocorrelation methods Comfort zone Detection methods Event detection Scientific researches Self-organized criticality Spatial temporals Numerical methods |
spellingShingle |
Numerical methods Self organized criticality Criticality (nuclear fission) Application-oriented Autocorrelation methods Comfort zone Detection methods Event detection Scientific researches Self-organized criticality Spatial temporals Numerical methods McAteer, R.T.J. Aschwanden, M.J. Dimitropoulou, M. Georgoulis, M.K. Pruessner, G. Morales, L. Ireland, J. Abramenko, V. 25 Years of Self-organized Criticality: Numerical Detection Methods |
topic_facet |
Numerical methods Self organized criticality Criticality (nuclear fission) Application-oriented Autocorrelation methods Comfort zone Detection methods Event detection Scientific researches Self-organized criticality Spatial temporals Numerical methods |
description |
The detection and characterization of self-organized criticality (SOC), in both real and simulated data, has undergone many significant revisions over the past 25 years. The explosive advances in the many numerical methods available for detecting, discriminating, and ultimately testing, SOC have played a critical role in developing our understanding of how systems experience and exhibit SOC. In this article, methods of detecting SOC are reviewed; from correlations to complexity to critical quantities. A description of the basic autocorrelation method leads into a detailed analysis of application-oriented methods developed in the last 25 years. In the second half of this manuscript space-based, time-based and spatial-temporal methods are reviewed and the prevalence of power laws in nature is described, with an emphasis on event detection and characterization. The search for numerical methods to clearly and unambiguously detect SOC in data often leads us outside the comfort zone of our own disciplines—the answers to these questions are often obtained by studying the advances made in other fields of study. In addition, numerical detection methods often provide the optimum link between simulations and experiments in scientific research. We seek to explore this boundary where the rubber meets the road, to review this expanding field of research of numerical detection of SOC systems over the past 25 years, and to iterate forwards so as to provide some foresight and guidance into developing breakthroughs in this subject over the next quarter of a century. © 2015, Springer Science+Business Media Dordrecht. |
format |
JOUR |
author |
McAteer, R.T.J. Aschwanden, M.J. Dimitropoulou, M. Georgoulis, M.K. Pruessner, G. Morales, L. Ireland, J. Abramenko, V. |
author_facet |
McAteer, R.T.J. Aschwanden, M.J. Dimitropoulou, M. Georgoulis, M.K. Pruessner, G. Morales, L. Ireland, J. Abramenko, V. |
author_sort |
McAteer, R.T.J. |
title |
25 Years of Self-organized Criticality: Numerical Detection Methods |
title_short |
25 Years of Self-organized Criticality: Numerical Detection Methods |
title_full |
25 Years of Self-organized Criticality: Numerical Detection Methods |
title_fullStr |
25 Years of Self-organized Criticality: Numerical Detection Methods |
title_full_unstemmed |
25 Years of Self-organized Criticality: Numerical Detection Methods |
title_sort |
25 years of self-organized criticality: numerical detection methods |
url |
http://hdl.handle.net/20.500.12110/paper_00386308_v198_n1-4_p217_McAteer |
work_keys_str_mv |
AT mcateerrtj 25yearsofselforganizedcriticalitynumericaldetectionmethods AT aschwandenmj 25yearsofselforganizedcriticalitynumericaldetectionmethods AT dimitropouloum 25yearsofselforganizedcriticalitynumericaldetectionmethods AT georgoulismk 25yearsofselforganizedcriticalitynumericaldetectionmethods AT pruessnerg 25yearsofselforganizedcriticalitynumericaldetectionmethods AT moralesl 25yearsofselforganizedcriticalitynumericaldetectionmethods AT irelandj 25yearsofselforganizedcriticalitynumericaldetectionmethods AT abramenkov 25yearsofselforganizedcriticalitynumericaldetectionmethods |
_version_ |
1782025635095379968 |