Thermographic recordings show that honeybees may receive nectar from foragers even during short trophallactic contacts

Forager bees that return from nectar sources transfer the gathered liquid to receiver hive mates through mouth-to-mouth contacts (trophallaxis). After returning from a nectar source, several trophallactic events of different lengths usually occur between the incoming forager and hive-mates. No unifi...

Descripción completa

Guardado en:
Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Farina, W.M., Wainselboim, A.J.
Formato: JOUR
Materias:
Acceso en línea:http://hdl.handle.net/20.500.12110/paper_00201812_v48_n4_p360_Farina
Aporte de:
id todo:paper_00201812_v48_n4_p360_Farina
record_format dspace
spelling todo:paper_00201812_v48_n4_p360_Farina2023-10-03T14:17:24Z Thermographic recordings show that honeybees may receive nectar from foragers even during short trophallactic contacts Farina, W.M. Wainselboim, A.J. Apis mellifera Foraging Honeybees Thermography Trophallaxis foraging behavior honeybee nectar temperature Apidae Apidae Apis mellifera Apoidea Hymenoptera Hymenoptera Forager bees that return from nectar sources transfer the gathered liquid to receiver hive mates through mouth-to-mouth contacts (trophallaxis). After returning from a nectar source, several trophallactic events of different lengths usually occur between the incoming forager and hive-mates. No unified criterion exists so far on the minimum time required for an effective food transfer to actually occur. By means of non-invasive thermographic recordings it was possible to observe that the warm nectar regurgitated by the returning donor forager heated up abruptly the proboscis of the recipient. By using this methodology, we analyzed the increase in the receiver's proboscis temperature as an indicator of effective food transfer between arriving donor foragers and receiver hive mates. Results show that under the present experimental conditions, all contacts lasting more than 3 seconds were effective food transfers, while most contacts lasting 2-3 s (87.5%) also showed liquid food transference. Moreover, even during contacts lasting 1-2 s it was possible for receiver bees to obtain samples of food via trophallaxis. Present results help define more accurately the minimum time required for an oral contact to allow effective food transfer. Fil:Farina, W.M. Universidad de Buenos Aires. Facultad de Ciencias Exactas y Naturales; Argentina. Fil:Wainselboim, A.J. Universidad de Buenos Aires. Facultad de Ciencias Exactas y Naturales; Argentina. JOUR info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.5/ar http://hdl.handle.net/20.500.12110/paper_00201812_v48_n4_p360_Farina
institution Universidad de Buenos Aires
institution_str I-28
repository_str R-134
collection Biblioteca Digital - Facultad de Ciencias Exactas y Naturales (UBA)
topic Apis mellifera
Foraging
Honeybees
Thermography
Trophallaxis
foraging behavior
honeybee
nectar
temperature
Apidae
Apidae
Apis mellifera
Apoidea
Hymenoptera
Hymenoptera
spellingShingle Apis mellifera
Foraging
Honeybees
Thermography
Trophallaxis
foraging behavior
honeybee
nectar
temperature
Apidae
Apidae
Apis mellifera
Apoidea
Hymenoptera
Hymenoptera
Farina, W.M.
Wainselboim, A.J.
Thermographic recordings show that honeybees may receive nectar from foragers even during short trophallactic contacts
topic_facet Apis mellifera
Foraging
Honeybees
Thermography
Trophallaxis
foraging behavior
honeybee
nectar
temperature
Apidae
Apidae
Apis mellifera
Apoidea
Hymenoptera
Hymenoptera
description Forager bees that return from nectar sources transfer the gathered liquid to receiver hive mates through mouth-to-mouth contacts (trophallaxis). After returning from a nectar source, several trophallactic events of different lengths usually occur between the incoming forager and hive-mates. No unified criterion exists so far on the minimum time required for an effective food transfer to actually occur. By means of non-invasive thermographic recordings it was possible to observe that the warm nectar regurgitated by the returning donor forager heated up abruptly the proboscis of the recipient. By using this methodology, we analyzed the increase in the receiver's proboscis temperature as an indicator of effective food transfer between arriving donor foragers and receiver hive mates. Results show that under the present experimental conditions, all contacts lasting more than 3 seconds were effective food transfers, while most contacts lasting 2-3 s (87.5%) also showed liquid food transference. Moreover, even during contacts lasting 1-2 s it was possible for receiver bees to obtain samples of food via trophallaxis. Present results help define more accurately the minimum time required for an oral contact to allow effective food transfer.
format JOUR
author Farina, W.M.
Wainselboim, A.J.
author_facet Farina, W.M.
Wainselboim, A.J.
author_sort Farina, W.M.
title Thermographic recordings show that honeybees may receive nectar from foragers even during short trophallactic contacts
title_short Thermographic recordings show that honeybees may receive nectar from foragers even during short trophallactic contacts
title_full Thermographic recordings show that honeybees may receive nectar from foragers even during short trophallactic contacts
title_fullStr Thermographic recordings show that honeybees may receive nectar from foragers even during short trophallactic contacts
title_full_unstemmed Thermographic recordings show that honeybees may receive nectar from foragers even during short trophallactic contacts
title_sort thermographic recordings show that honeybees may receive nectar from foragers even during short trophallactic contacts
url http://hdl.handle.net/20.500.12110/paper_00201812_v48_n4_p360_Farina
work_keys_str_mv AT farinawm thermographicrecordingsshowthathoneybeesmayreceivenectarfromforagersevenduringshorttrophallacticcontacts
AT wainselboimaj thermographicrecordingsshowthathoneybeesmayreceivenectarfromforagersevenduringshorttrophallacticcontacts
_version_ 1782030696201584640