Does spacecraft trajectory strongly affect detection of magnetic clouds?
Context. Magnetic clouds (MCs) are a subset of interplanetary coronal mass ejections (ICMEs). One property of MCs is the presence of a magnetic flux rope. Is the difference between ICMEs with and without MCs intrinsic or rather due to an observational bias? Aims. As the spacecraft has no relationshi...
Guardado en:
| Autores principales: | , , |
|---|---|
| Formato: | Artículo publishedVersion |
| Lenguaje: | Inglés |
| Publicado: |
2013
|
| Materias: | |
| Acceso en línea: | http://hdl.handle.net/20.500.12110/paper_00046361_v550_n_p_Demoulin |
| Aporte de: |
| id |
paperaa:paper_00046361_v550_n_p_Demoulin |
|---|---|
| record_format |
dspace |
| spelling |
paperaa:paper_00046361_v550_n_p_Demoulin2023-06-12T16:40:55Z Does spacecraft trajectory strongly affect detection of magnetic clouds? Astron. Astrophys. 2013;550 Démoulin, P. Dasso, S. Janvier, M. Magnetic fields Solar-terrestrial relations Sun: coronal mass ejections (CMEs) Sun: heliosphere Affect detection Boundary shapes Current distribution Decreasing functions Flux rope model Flux ropes Force free fields Frequency distributions Heliospheres Impact-parameter Interplanetary coronal mass ejections Large parts Low field Magnetic clouds Magnetic flux ropes Natural consequences Non-detection Parameter spaces Rotation angles Solar-terrestrial relations Spacecraft trajectories Sun: coronal mass ejection Uniform distribution Aspect ratio Computer simulation Magnetic fields Magnetic flux Planetary surface analysis Spacecraft Trajectories Parameter estimation Context. Magnetic clouds (MCs) are a subset of interplanetary coronal mass ejections (ICMEs). One property of MCs is the presence of a magnetic flux rope. Is the difference between ICMEs with and without MCs intrinsic or rather due to an observational bias? Aims. As the spacecraft has no relationship with the MC trajectory, the frequency distribution of MCs versus the spacecraft distance to the MCs' axis is expected to be approximately flat. However, Lepping & Wu (2010, Ann. Geophys., 28, 1539) confirmed that it is a strongly decreasing function of the estimated impact parameter. Is a flux rope more frequently undetected for larger impact parameter? Methods. In order to answer the questions above, we explore the parameter space of flux rope models, especially the aspect ratio, boundary shape, and current distribution. The proposed models are analyzed as MCs by fitting a circular linear force-free field to the magnetic field computed along simulated crossings. Results. We find that the distribution of the twist within the flux rope and the non-detection due to too low field rotation angle or magnitude only weakly affect the expected frequency distribution of MCs versus impact parameter. However, the estimated impact parameter is increasingly biased to lower values as the flux rope cross section is more elongated orthogonally to the crossing trajectory. The observed distribution of MCs is a natural consequence of a flux rope cross section flattened on average by a factor 2 to 3 depending on the magnetic twist profile. However, the faster MCs at 1 AU, with V > 550 km s-1, present an almost uniform distribution of MCs vs. impact parameter, which is consistent with round-shaped flux ropes, in contrast with the slower ones. Conclusions. We conclude that the sampling of MCs at various distances from the axis does not significantly affect their detection. The large part of ICMEs without MCs could be due to a too strict criteria for MCs or to the fact that these ICMEs are encountered outside their flux rope or near the leg region, or they do not contain a flux rope. © 2013 ESO. Fil:Dasso, S. Universidad de Buenos Aires. Facultad de Ciencias Exactas y Naturales; Argentina. 2013 info:eu-repo/semantics/article info:ar-repo/semantics/artículo info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion application/pdf eng info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.5/ar http://hdl.handle.net/20.500.12110/paper_00046361_v550_n_p_Demoulin |
| institution |
Universidad de Buenos Aires |
| institution_str |
I-28 |
| repository_str |
R-134 |
| collection |
Biblioteca Digital - Facultad de Ciencias Exactas y Naturales (UBA) |
| language |
Inglés |
| orig_language_str_mv |
eng |
| topic |
Magnetic fields Solar-terrestrial relations Sun: coronal mass ejections (CMEs) Sun: heliosphere Affect detection Boundary shapes Current distribution Decreasing functions Flux rope model Flux ropes Force free fields Frequency distributions Heliospheres Impact-parameter Interplanetary coronal mass ejections Large parts Low field Magnetic clouds Magnetic flux ropes Natural consequences Non-detection Parameter spaces Rotation angles Solar-terrestrial relations Spacecraft trajectories Sun: coronal mass ejection Uniform distribution Aspect ratio Computer simulation Magnetic fields Magnetic flux Planetary surface analysis Spacecraft Trajectories Parameter estimation |
| spellingShingle |
Magnetic fields Solar-terrestrial relations Sun: coronal mass ejections (CMEs) Sun: heliosphere Affect detection Boundary shapes Current distribution Decreasing functions Flux rope model Flux ropes Force free fields Frequency distributions Heliospheres Impact-parameter Interplanetary coronal mass ejections Large parts Low field Magnetic clouds Magnetic flux ropes Natural consequences Non-detection Parameter spaces Rotation angles Solar-terrestrial relations Spacecraft trajectories Sun: coronal mass ejection Uniform distribution Aspect ratio Computer simulation Magnetic fields Magnetic flux Planetary surface analysis Spacecraft Trajectories Parameter estimation Démoulin, P. Dasso, S. Janvier, M. Does spacecraft trajectory strongly affect detection of magnetic clouds? |
| topic_facet |
Magnetic fields Solar-terrestrial relations Sun: coronal mass ejections (CMEs) Sun: heliosphere Affect detection Boundary shapes Current distribution Decreasing functions Flux rope model Flux ropes Force free fields Frequency distributions Heliospheres Impact-parameter Interplanetary coronal mass ejections Large parts Low field Magnetic clouds Magnetic flux ropes Natural consequences Non-detection Parameter spaces Rotation angles Solar-terrestrial relations Spacecraft trajectories Sun: coronal mass ejection Uniform distribution Aspect ratio Computer simulation Magnetic fields Magnetic flux Planetary surface analysis Spacecraft Trajectories Parameter estimation |
| description |
Context. Magnetic clouds (MCs) are a subset of interplanetary coronal mass ejections (ICMEs). One property of MCs is the presence of a magnetic flux rope. Is the difference between ICMEs with and without MCs intrinsic or rather due to an observational bias? Aims. As the spacecraft has no relationship with the MC trajectory, the frequency distribution of MCs versus the spacecraft distance to the MCs' axis is expected to be approximately flat. However, Lepping & Wu (2010, Ann. Geophys., 28, 1539) confirmed that it is a strongly decreasing function of the estimated impact parameter. Is a flux rope more frequently undetected for larger impact parameter? Methods. In order to answer the questions above, we explore the parameter space of flux rope models, especially the aspect ratio, boundary shape, and current distribution. The proposed models are analyzed as MCs by fitting a circular linear force-free field to the magnetic field computed along simulated crossings. Results. We find that the distribution of the twist within the flux rope and the non-detection due to too low field rotation angle or magnitude only weakly affect the expected frequency distribution of MCs versus impact parameter. However, the estimated impact parameter is increasingly biased to lower values as the flux rope cross section is more elongated orthogonally to the crossing trajectory. The observed distribution of MCs is a natural consequence of a flux rope cross section flattened on average by a factor 2 to 3 depending on the magnetic twist profile. However, the faster MCs at 1 AU, with V > 550 km s-1, present an almost uniform distribution of MCs vs. impact parameter, which is consistent with round-shaped flux ropes, in contrast with the slower ones. Conclusions. We conclude that the sampling of MCs at various distances from the axis does not significantly affect their detection. The large part of ICMEs without MCs could be due to a too strict criteria for MCs or to the fact that these ICMEs are encountered outside their flux rope or near the leg region, or they do not contain a flux rope. © 2013 ESO. |
| format |
Artículo Artículo publishedVersion |
| author |
Démoulin, P. Dasso, S. Janvier, M. |
| author_facet |
Démoulin, P. Dasso, S. Janvier, M. |
| author_sort |
Démoulin, P. |
| title |
Does spacecraft trajectory strongly affect detection of magnetic clouds? |
| title_short |
Does spacecraft trajectory strongly affect detection of magnetic clouds? |
| title_full |
Does spacecraft trajectory strongly affect detection of magnetic clouds? |
| title_fullStr |
Does spacecraft trajectory strongly affect detection of magnetic clouds? |
| title_full_unstemmed |
Does spacecraft trajectory strongly affect detection of magnetic clouds? |
| title_sort |
does spacecraft trajectory strongly affect detection of magnetic clouds? |
| publishDate |
2013 |
| url |
http://hdl.handle.net/20.500.12110/paper_00046361_v550_n_p_Demoulin |
| work_keys_str_mv |
AT demoulinp doesspacecrafttrajectorystronglyaffectdetectionofmagneticclouds AT dassos doesspacecrafttrajectorystronglyaffectdetectionofmagneticclouds AT janvierm doesspacecrafttrajectorystronglyaffectdetectionofmagneticclouds |
| _version_ |
1769810309410717696 |