Reply to "comment on 'Troublesome aspects of the Renyi-MaxEnt treatment' " COMMENTS COMMENTS

This Reply is intended as a refutation of the preceding Comment [Oikonomou and Bagci, Phys. Rev. E 96, 056101 (2017)10.1103/PhysRevE.96.056101] on our paper [Plastino, Phys. Rev. E 94, 012145 (2016).1539-375510.1103/PhysRevE.94.012145]. We show that the Tsallis probability distribution of our paper...

Descripción completa

Guardado en:
Detalles Bibliográficos
Publicado: 2017
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://bibliotecadigital.exactas.uba.ar/collection/paper/document/paper_24700045_v96_n5_p_Plastino
http://hdl.handle.net/20.500.12110/paper_24700045_v96_n5_p_Plastino
Aporte de:
id paper:paper_24700045_v96_n5_p_Plastino
record_format dspace
spelling paper:paper_24700045_v96_n5_p_Plastino2023-06-08T16:36:44Z Reply to "comment on 'Troublesome aspects of the Renyi-MaxEnt treatment' " COMMENTS COMMENTS Tsallis distributions Probability distributions This Reply is intended as a refutation of the preceding Comment [Oikonomou and Bagci, Phys. Rev. E 96, 056101 (2017)10.1103/PhysRevE.96.056101] on our paper [Plastino, Phys. Rev. E 94, 012145 (2016).1539-375510.1103/PhysRevE.94.012145]. We show that the Tsallis probability distribution of our paper does not coincide with the Tsallis distribution studied by Oikonomou and Bagci. Consequently, their findings do not apply to our paper. © 2017 American Physical Society. 2017 https://bibliotecadigital.exactas.uba.ar/collection/paper/document/paper_24700045_v96_n5_p_Plastino http://hdl.handle.net/20.500.12110/paper_24700045_v96_n5_p_Plastino
institution Universidad de Buenos Aires
institution_str I-28
repository_str R-134
collection Biblioteca Digital - Facultad de Ciencias Exactas y Naturales (UBA)
topic Tsallis distributions
Probability distributions
spellingShingle Tsallis distributions
Probability distributions
Reply to "comment on 'Troublesome aspects of the Renyi-MaxEnt treatment' " COMMENTS COMMENTS
topic_facet Tsallis distributions
Probability distributions
description This Reply is intended as a refutation of the preceding Comment [Oikonomou and Bagci, Phys. Rev. E 96, 056101 (2017)10.1103/PhysRevE.96.056101] on our paper [Plastino, Phys. Rev. E 94, 012145 (2016).1539-375510.1103/PhysRevE.94.012145]. We show that the Tsallis probability distribution of our paper does not coincide with the Tsallis distribution studied by Oikonomou and Bagci. Consequently, their findings do not apply to our paper. © 2017 American Physical Society.
title Reply to "comment on 'Troublesome aspects of the Renyi-MaxEnt treatment' " COMMENTS COMMENTS
title_short Reply to "comment on 'Troublesome aspects of the Renyi-MaxEnt treatment' " COMMENTS COMMENTS
title_full Reply to "comment on 'Troublesome aspects of the Renyi-MaxEnt treatment' " COMMENTS COMMENTS
title_fullStr Reply to "comment on 'Troublesome aspects of the Renyi-MaxEnt treatment' " COMMENTS COMMENTS
title_full_unstemmed Reply to "comment on 'Troublesome aspects of the Renyi-MaxEnt treatment' " COMMENTS COMMENTS
title_sort reply to "comment on 'troublesome aspects of the renyi-maxent treatment' " comments comments
publishDate 2017
url https://bibliotecadigital.exactas.uba.ar/collection/paper/document/paper_24700045_v96_n5_p_Plastino
http://hdl.handle.net/20.500.12110/paper_24700045_v96_n5_p_Plastino
_version_ 1768541773576011776