Reply to "comment on 'Troublesome aspects of the Renyi-MaxEnt treatment' " COMMENTS COMMENTS
This Reply is intended as a refutation of the preceding Comment [Oikonomou and Bagci, Phys. Rev. E 96, 056101 (2017)10.1103/PhysRevE.96.056101] on our paper [Plastino, Phys. Rev. E 94, 012145 (2016).1539-375510.1103/PhysRevE.94.012145]. We show that the Tsallis probability distribution of our paper...
Guardado en:
Publicado: |
2017
|
---|---|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://bibliotecadigital.exactas.uba.ar/collection/paper/document/paper_24700045_v96_n5_p_Plastino http://hdl.handle.net/20.500.12110/paper_24700045_v96_n5_p_Plastino |
Aporte de: |
id |
paper:paper_24700045_v96_n5_p_Plastino |
---|---|
record_format |
dspace |
spelling |
paper:paper_24700045_v96_n5_p_Plastino2023-06-08T16:36:44Z Reply to "comment on 'Troublesome aspects of the Renyi-MaxEnt treatment' " COMMENTS COMMENTS Tsallis distributions Probability distributions This Reply is intended as a refutation of the preceding Comment [Oikonomou and Bagci, Phys. Rev. E 96, 056101 (2017)10.1103/PhysRevE.96.056101] on our paper [Plastino, Phys. Rev. E 94, 012145 (2016).1539-375510.1103/PhysRevE.94.012145]. We show that the Tsallis probability distribution of our paper does not coincide with the Tsallis distribution studied by Oikonomou and Bagci. Consequently, their findings do not apply to our paper. © 2017 American Physical Society. 2017 https://bibliotecadigital.exactas.uba.ar/collection/paper/document/paper_24700045_v96_n5_p_Plastino http://hdl.handle.net/20.500.12110/paper_24700045_v96_n5_p_Plastino |
institution |
Universidad de Buenos Aires |
institution_str |
I-28 |
repository_str |
R-134 |
collection |
Biblioteca Digital - Facultad de Ciencias Exactas y Naturales (UBA) |
topic |
Tsallis distributions Probability distributions |
spellingShingle |
Tsallis distributions Probability distributions Reply to "comment on 'Troublesome aspects of the Renyi-MaxEnt treatment' " COMMENTS COMMENTS |
topic_facet |
Tsallis distributions Probability distributions |
description |
This Reply is intended as a refutation of the preceding Comment [Oikonomou and Bagci, Phys. Rev. E 96, 056101 (2017)10.1103/PhysRevE.96.056101] on our paper [Plastino, Phys. Rev. E 94, 012145 (2016).1539-375510.1103/PhysRevE.94.012145]. We show that the Tsallis probability distribution of our paper does not coincide with the Tsallis distribution studied by Oikonomou and Bagci. Consequently, their findings do not apply to our paper. © 2017 American Physical Society. |
title |
Reply to "comment on 'Troublesome aspects of the Renyi-MaxEnt treatment' " COMMENTS COMMENTS |
title_short |
Reply to "comment on 'Troublesome aspects of the Renyi-MaxEnt treatment' " COMMENTS COMMENTS |
title_full |
Reply to "comment on 'Troublesome aspects of the Renyi-MaxEnt treatment' " COMMENTS COMMENTS |
title_fullStr |
Reply to "comment on 'Troublesome aspects of the Renyi-MaxEnt treatment' " COMMENTS COMMENTS |
title_full_unstemmed |
Reply to "comment on 'Troublesome aspects of the Renyi-MaxEnt treatment' " COMMENTS COMMENTS |
title_sort |
reply to "comment on 'troublesome aspects of the renyi-maxent treatment' " comments comments |
publishDate |
2017 |
url |
https://bibliotecadigital.exactas.uba.ar/collection/paper/document/paper_24700045_v96_n5_p_Plastino http://hdl.handle.net/20.500.12110/paper_24700045_v96_n5_p_Plastino |
_version_ |
1768541773576011776 |