Calibration approaches for language detection

To date, automatic spoken language detection research has largely been based on a closed-set paradigm, in which the languages to be detected are known prior to system application. In actual practice, such systems may face previously unseen languages (out-of-set (OOS) languages) which should be rejec...

Descripción completa

Guardado en:
Detalles Bibliográficos
Publicado: 2017
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://bibliotecadigital.exactas.uba.ar/collection/paper/document/paper_2308457X_v2017-August_n_p2804_McLaren
http://hdl.handle.net/20.500.12110/paper_2308457X_v2017-August_n_p2804_McLaren
Aporte de:
id paper:paper_2308457X_v2017-August_n_p2804_McLaren
record_format dspace
spelling paper:paper_2308457X_v2017-August_n_p2804_McLaren2023-06-08T16:35:32Z Calibration approaches for language detection Bins Calibration Speech communication Speech recognition Language detection Limited attentions Objective functions Research communities Spoken languages System applications System constraints Training data Modeling languages To date, automatic spoken language detection research has largely been based on a closed-set paradigm, in which the languages to be detected are known prior to system application. In actual practice, such systems may face previously unseen languages (out-of-set (OOS) languages) which should be rejected, a common problem that has received limited attention from the research community. In this paper, we focus on situations in which either (1) the system-modeled languages are not observed during use or (2) the test data contains OOS languages that are unseen during modeling or calibration. In these situations, the common multi-class objective function for calibration of language-detection scores is problematic. We describe how the assumptions of multi-class calibration are not always fulfilled in a practical sense and explore applying global and language-dependent binary objective functions to relax system constraints. We contrast the benefits and sensitivities of the calibration approaches on practical scenarios by presenting results using both LRE09 data and 14 languages from the BABEL dataset. We show that the global binary approach is less sensitive to the characteristics of the training data and that OOS modeling with individual detectors is the best option when OOS test languages are not known to the system. Copyright © 2017 ISCA. 2017 https://bibliotecadigital.exactas.uba.ar/collection/paper/document/paper_2308457X_v2017-August_n_p2804_McLaren http://hdl.handle.net/20.500.12110/paper_2308457X_v2017-August_n_p2804_McLaren
institution Universidad de Buenos Aires
institution_str I-28
repository_str R-134
collection Biblioteca Digital - Facultad de Ciencias Exactas y Naturales (UBA)
topic Bins
Calibration
Speech communication
Speech recognition
Language detection
Limited attentions
Objective functions
Research communities
Spoken languages
System applications
System constraints
Training data
Modeling languages
spellingShingle Bins
Calibration
Speech communication
Speech recognition
Language detection
Limited attentions
Objective functions
Research communities
Spoken languages
System applications
System constraints
Training data
Modeling languages
Calibration approaches for language detection
topic_facet Bins
Calibration
Speech communication
Speech recognition
Language detection
Limited attentions
Objective functions
Research communities
Spoken languages
System applications
System constraints
Training data
Modeling languages
description To date, automatic spoken language detection research has largely been based on a closed-set paradigm, in which the languages to be detected are known prior to system application. In actual practice, such systems may face previously unseen languages (out-of-set (OOS) languages) which should be rejected, a common problem that has received limited attention from the research community. In this paper, we focus on situations in which either (1) the system-modeled languages are not observed during use or (2) the test data contains OOS languages that are unseen during modeling or calibration. In these situations, the common multi-class objective function for calibration of language-detection scores is problematic. We describe how the assumptions of multi-class calibration are not always fulfilled in a practical sense and explore applying global and language-dependent binary objective functions to relax system constraints. We contrast the benefits and sensitivities of the calibration approaches on practical scenarios by presenting results using both LRE09 data and 14 languages from the BABEL dataset. We show that the global binary approach is less sensitive to the characteristics of the training data and that OOS modeling with individual detectors is the best option when OOS test languages are not known to the system. Copyright © 2017 ISCA.
title Calibration approaches for language detection
title_short Calibration approaches for language detection
title_full Calibration approaches for language detection
title_fullStr Calibration approaches for language detection
title_full_unstemmed Calibration approaches for language detection
title_sort calibration approaches for language detection
publishDate 2017
url https://bibliotecadigital.exactas.uba.ar/collection/paper/document/paper_2308457X_v2017-August_n_p2804_McLaren
http://hdl.handle.net/20.500.12110/paper_2308457X_v2017-August_n_p2804_McLaren
_version_ 1768541821193945088