Validation of an enzyme immunoassay for the determination of total homocysteine in plasma

In recent years, the determination of homocysteine (Hcy) has become increasingly important, since high levels of Hcy in plasma or serum represent an independent risk factor for occlusive vascular diseases. Nowadays, clinical laboratories use several analytical techniques to measure Hcy, of which hig...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Publicado: 2000
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://bibliotecadigital.exactas.uba.ar/collection/paper/document/paper_09575235_v11_n3_p235_Quintana
http://hdl.handle.net/20.500.12110/paper_09575235_v11_n3_p235_Quintana
Aporte de:
id paper:paper_09575235_v11_n3_p235_Quintana
record_format dspace
spelling paper:paper_09575235_v11_n3_p235_Quintana2023-06-08T15:56:37Z Validation of an enzyme immunoassay for the determination of total homocysteine in plasma Enzyme immunoassay Homocysteine Validation homocysteine article enzyme immunoassay high performance liquid chromatography human human experiment intermethod comparison normal human priority journal Homocysteine Humans Immunoenzyme Techniques Sensitivity and Specificity In recent years, the determination of homocysteine (Hcy) has become increasingly important, since high levels of Hcy in plasma or serum represent an independent risk factor for occlusive vascular diseases. Nowadays, clinical laboratories use several analytical techniques to measure Hcy, of which high-performance liquid chromatography (HPLC) is the most popular. Recently, assays for Hcy quantification based on enzyme immunoassays (EIA) have become commercially available. Our group carried out the validation of the Axis method and compared results with those obtained by an established HPLC assay. Intra- and inter-assay coefficients of variation were ≤ 8.5%. Compared with HPLC, linear regression analysis showed r = 0.984, slope = 0.952, intercept = 1.24 μmol/l; Bland-Altman procedure, the mean of the difference EIA-HPLC results = 0.5 μmol/l. Our results suggest that Hcy determinations by both methods are equivalent, and that the Axis assay provides reproducible and reliable data. (C) 2000 Lippincott Williams and Wilkins. 2000 https://bibliotecadigital.exactas.uba.ar/collection/paper/document/paper_09575235_v11_n3_p235_Quintana http://hdl.handle.net/20.500.12110/paper_09575235_v11_n3_p235_Quintana
institution Universidad de Buenos Aires
institution_str I-28
repository_str R-134
collection Biblioteca Digital - Facultad de Ciencias Exactas y Naturales (UBA)
topic Enzyme immunoassay
Homocysteine
Validation
homocysteine
article
enzyme immunoassay
high performance liquid chromatography
human
human experiment
intermethod comparison
normal human
priority journal
Homocysteine
Humans
Immunoenzyme Techniques
Sensitivity and Specificity
spellingShingle Enzyme immunoassay
Homocysteine
Validation
homocysteine
article
enzyme immunoassay
high performance liquid chromatography
human
human experiment
intermethod comparison
normal human
priority journal
Homocysteine
Humans
Immunoenzyme Techniques
Sensitivity and Specificity
Validation of an enzyme immunoassay for the determination of total homocysteine in plasma
topic_facet Enzyme immunoassay
Homocysteine
Validation
homocysteine
article
enzyme immunoassay
high performance liquid chromatography
human
human experiment
intermethod comparison
normal human
priority journal
Homocysteine
Humans
Immunoenzyme Techniques
Sensitivity and Specificity
description In recent years, the determination of homocysteine (Hcy) has become increasingly important, since high levels of Hcy in plasma or serum represent an independent risk factor for occlusive vascular diseases. Nowadays, clinical laboratories use several analytical techniques to measure Hcy, of which high-performance liquid chromatography (HPLC) is the most popular. Recently, assays for Hcy quantification based on enzyme immunoassays (EIA) have become commercially available. Our group carried out the validation of the Axis method and compared results with those obtained by an established HPLC assay. Intra- and inter-assay coefficients of variation were ≤ 8.5%. Compared with HPLC, linear regression analysis showed r = 0.984, slope = 0.952, intercept = 1.24 μmol/l; Bland-Altman procedure, the mean of the difference EIA-HPLC results = 0.5 μmol/l. Our results suggest that Hcy determinations by both methods are equivalent, and that the Axis assay provides reproducible and reliable data. (C) 2000 Lippincott Williams and Wilkins.
title Validation of an enzyme immunoassay for the determination of total homocysteine in plasma
title_short Validation of an enzyme immunoassay for the determination of total homocysteine in plasma
title_full Validation of an enzyme immunoassay for the determination of total homocysteine in plasma
title_fullStr Validation of an enzyme immunoassay for the determination of total homocysteine in plasma
title_full_unstemmed Validation of an enzyme immunoassay for the determination of total homocysteine in plasma
title_sort validation of an enzyme immunoassay for the determination of total homocysteine in plasma
publishDate 2000
url https://bibliotecadigital.exactas.uba.ar/collection/paper/document/paper_09575235_v11_n3_p235_Quintana
http://hdl.handle.net/20.500.12110/paper_09575235_v11_n3_p235_Quintana
_version_ 1768545984202145792