Limits on introspection: Distorted subjective time during the dual-task bottleneck: Research article

Which cognitive processes are accessible to conscious report? To study the limits of conscious reportability, we designed a novel method of quantified introspection, in which subjects were asked, after each trial of a standard cognitive task, to estimate the time spent completing the task. We then a...

Descripción completa

Guardado en:
Detalles Bibliográficos
Publicado: 2008
Acceso en línea:https://bibliotecadigital.exactas.uba.ar/collection/paper/document/paper_09567976_v19_n11_p1110_Corallo
http://hdl.handle.net/20.500.12110/paper_09567976_v19_n11_p1110_Corallo
Aporte de:
id paper:paper_09567976_v19_n11_p1110_Corallo
record_format dspace
spelling paper:paper_09567976_v19_n11_p1110_Corallo2023-06-08T15:56:23Z Limits on introspection: Distorted subjective time during the dual-task bottleneck: Research article Which cognitive processes are accessible to conscious report? To study the limits of conscious reportability, we designed a novel method of quantified introspection, in which subjects were asked, after each trial of a standard cognitive task, to estimate the time spent completing the task. We then applied classical mental-chronometry techniques, such as the additive-factors method, to analyze these introspective estimates of response time. We demonstrate that introspective response time can be a sensitive measure, tightly correlated with objective response time in a single-task context. In a psychological-refractory- period task, however, the objective processing delay resulting from interference by a second concurrent task is totally absent from introspective estimates. These results suggest that introspective estimates of time spent on a task tightly correlate with the period of availability of central processing resources. © Copyright © 2008 Association for Psychological Science. 2008 https://bibliotecadigital.exactas.uba.ar/collection/paper/document/paper_09567976_v19_n11_p1110_Corallo http://hdl.handle.net/20.500.12110/paper_09567976_v19_n11_p1110_Corallo
institution Universidad de Buenos Aires
institution_str I-28
repository_str R-134
collection Biblioteca Digital - Facultad de Ciencias Exactas y Naturales (UBA)
description Which cognitive processes are accessible to conscious report? To study the limits of conscious reportability, we designed a novel method of quantified introspection, in which subjects were asked, after each trial of a standard cognitive task, to estimate the time spent completing the task. We then applied classical mental-chronometry techniques, such as the additive-factors method, to analyze these introspective estimates of response time. We demonstrate that introspective response time can be a sensitive measure, tightly correlated with objective response time in a single-task context. In a psychological-refractory- period task, however, the objective processing delay resulting from interference by a second concurrent task is totally absent from introspective estimates. These results suggest that introspective estimates of time spent on a task tightly correlate with the period of availability of central processing resources. © Copyright © 2008 Association for Psychological Science.
title Limits on introspection: Distorted subjective time during the dual-task bottleneck: Research article
spellingShingle Limits on introspection: Distorted subjective time during the dual-task bottleneck: Research article
title_short Limits on introspection: Distorted subjective time during the dual-task bottleneck: Research article
title_full Limits on introspection: Distorted subjective time during the dual-task bottleneck: Research article
title_fullStr Limits on introspection: Distorted subjective time during the dual-task bottleneck: Research article
title_full_unstemmed Limits on introspection: Distorted subjective time during the dual-task bottleneck: Research article
title_sort limits on introspection: distorted subjective time during the dual-task bottleneck: research article
publishDate 2008
url https://bibliotecadigital.exactas.uba.ar/collection/paper/document/paper_09567976_v19_n11_p1110_Corallo
http://hdl.handle.net/20.500.12110/paper_09567976_v19_n11_p1110_Corallo
_version_ 1768542604847218688