Comparison between remotely-sensed sea-surface temperature (AVHRR) and in situ records in San Matías Gulf (Patagonia, Argentina)

In situ records of sea surface temperature collected between 2005 and 2009 were used to compare, for the first time, the temperature estimated by the Multichannel algorithms (MCSST) of the Advanced Very High Resolution Radiometer (AVHRR) sensors in San Matías Gulf, in the north of the Argentinean Pa...

Descripción completa

Guardado en:
Detalles Bibliográficos
Publicado: 2014
Materias:
In situ records
Mcsst-avhrr
San matías gulf
Sea surface temperature
Southwestern atlantic
Acceso en línea:https://bibliotecadigital.exactas.uba.ar/collection/paper/document/paper_0718560X_v42_n1_p192_Williams
http://hdl.handle.net/20.500.12110/paper_0718560X_v42_n1_p192_Williams
Aporte de:
Biblioteca Digital - Facultad de Ciencias Exactas y Naturales (UBA) de Universidad de Buenos Aires
id paper:paper_0718560X_v42_n1_p192_Williams
record_format dspace
spelling paper:paper_0718560X_v42_n1_p192_Williams2023-06-08T15:43:09Z Comparison between remotely-sensed sea-surface temperature (AVHRR) and in situ records in San Matías Gulf (Patagonia, Argentina) In situ records Mcsst-avhrr San matías gulf Sea surface temperature Southwestern atlantic In situ records of sea surface temperature collected between 2005 and 2009 were used to compare, for the first time, the temperature estimated by the Multichannel algorithms (MCSST) of the Advanced Very High Resolution Radiometer (AVHRR) sensors in San Matías Gulf, in the north of the Argentinean Patagonian Continental Shelf (between 40o47'-42o13'S). Match-ups between in situ records and satellite sea surface temperature (SST) were analyzed. In situ records came from fixed stations and oceanographic cruises, while satellite data came from different NOAA satellites. The fitting of temperature data to a Standard Major Axis (SMA) type II regression model indicated that a high proportion of the total variance (0.53≤ r2 ≤0.99) was explained by this model showing a high correlation between in situ data and satellite estimations. The mean differences between satellite and in situ data for the full data set were 1.64 ± 1.49oC. Looking separately into in situ data from different sources and day and night estimates from different NOAA satellites, the differences were between 0.30 ± 0.60°C and 2.60 ± 1.50°C. In this paper we discuss possible reasons for the above-mentioned performance of the MCSST algorithms in the study area. 2014 https://bibliotecadigital.exactas.uba.ar/collection/paper/document/paper_0718560X_v42_n1_p192_Williams http://hdl.handle.net/20.500.12110/paper_0718560X_v42_n1_p192_Williams
institution Universidad de Buenos Aires
institution_str I-28
repository_str R-134
collection Biblioteca Digital - Facultad de Ciencias Exactas y Naturales (UBA)
topic In situ records
Mcsst-avhrr
San matías gulf
Sea surface temperature
Southwestern atlantic
spellingShingle In situ records
Mcsst-avhrr
San matías gulf
Sea surface temperature
Southwestern atlantic
Comparison between remotely-sensed sea-surface temperature (AVHRR) and in situ records in San Matías Gulf (Patagonia, Argentina)
topic_facet In situ records
Mcsst-avhrr
San matías gulf
Sea surface temperature
Southwestern atlantic
description In situ records of sea surface temperature collected between 2005 and 2009 were used to compare, for the first time, the temperature estimated by the Multichannel algorithms (MCSST) of the Advanced Very High Resolution Radiometer (AVHRR) sensors in San Matías Gulf, in the north of the Argentinean Patagonian Continental Shelf (between 40o47'-42o13'S). Match-ups between in situ records and satellite sea surface temperature (SST) were analyzed. In situ records came from fixed stations and oceanographic cruises, while satellite data came from different NOAA satellites. The fitting of temperature data to a Standard Major Axis (SMA) type II regression model indicated that a high proportion of the total variance (0.53≤ r2 ≤0.99) was explained by this model showing a high correlation between in situ data and satellite estimations. The mean differences between satellite and in situ data for the full data set were 1.64 ± 1.49oC. Looking separately into in situ data from different sources and day and night estimates from different NOAA satellites, the differences were between 0.30 ± 0.60°C and 2.60 ± 1.50°C. In this paper we discuss possible reasons for the above-mentioned performance of the MCSST algorithms in the study area.
title Comparison between remotely-sensed sea-surface temperature (AVHRR) and in situ records in San Matías Gulf (Patagonia, Argentina)
title_short Comparison between remotely-sensed sea-surface temperature (AVHRR) and in situ records in San Matías Gulf (Patagonia, Argentina)
title_full Comparison between remotely-sensed sea-surface temperature (AVHRR) and in situ records in San Matías Gulf (Patagonia, Argentina)
title_fullStr Comparison between remotely-sensed sea-surface temperature (AVHRR) and in situ records in San Matías Gulf (Patagonia, Argentina)
title_full_unstemmed Comparison between remotely-sensed sea-surface temperature (AVHRR) and in situ records in San Matías Gulf (Patagonia, Argentina)
title_sort comparison between remotely-sensed sea-surface temperature (avhrr) and in situ records in san matías gulf (patagonia, argentina)
publishDate 2014
url https://bibliotecadigital.exactas.uba.ar/collection/paper/document/paper_0718560X_v42_n1_p192_Williams
http://hdl.handle.net/20.500.12110/paper_0718560X_v42_n1_p192_Williams
_version_ 1768546119427555328

Ejemplares similares