Revisiting compatibility of input-output modal transition systems
Modern software systems are typically built of components that communicate through their external interfaces. The external behavior of a component can be effectively described using finite state automata-based formalisms. Such component models can then used for varied analyses. For example, interfac...
Guardado en:
Publicado: |
2014
|
---|---|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://bibliotecadigital.exactas.uba.ar/collection/paper/document/paper_03029743_v8442LNCS_n_p367_Krka http://hdl.handle.net/20.500.12110/paper_03029743_v8442LNCS_n_p367_Krka |
Aporte de: |
id |
paper:paper_03029743_v8442LNCS_n_p367_Krka |
---|---|
record_format |
dspace |
spelling |
paper:paper_03029743_v8442LNCS_n_p367_Krka2023-06-08T15:28:53Z Revisiting compatibility of input-output modal transition systems Interface states Automata-based formalisms Component implementations External behavior Interface automata Modal Transition Systems Modeling formalisms Requirements specifications Software systems Automata theory Modern software systems are typically built of components that communicate through their external interfaces. The external behavior of a component can be effectively described using finite state automata-based formalisms. Such component models can then used for varied analyses. For example, interface automata, which model the behavior of components in terms of component states and transitions between them, can be used to check whether the resulting system is compatible. By contrast, partial-behavior modeling formalisms, such as modal transition systems, can be used to capture and then verify properties of sets of prospective component implementations that satisfy an incomplete requirements specification. In this paper, we study how pairwise compatibility should be defined for partial-behavior models. To this end, we describe the limitations of the existing compatibility definitions, propose a set of novel compatibility notions for modal interface automata, and propose efficient, correct, and complete compatibility checking procedures © 2014 Springer International Publishing Switzerland. 2014 https://bibliotecadigital.exactas.uba.ar/collection/paper/document/paper_03029743_v8442LNCS_n_p367_Krka http://hdl.handle.net/20.500.12110/paper_03029743_v8442LNCS_n_p367_Krka |
institution |
Universidad de Buenos Aires |
institution_str |
I-28 |
repository_str |
R-134 |
collection |
Biblioteca Digital - Facultad de Ciencias Exactas y Naturales (UBA) |
topic |
Interface states Automata-based formalisms Component implementations External behavior Interface automata Modal Transition Systems Modeling formalisms Requirements specifications Software systems Automata theory |
spellingShingle |
Interface states Automata-based formalisms Component implementations External behavior Interface automata Modal Transition Systems Modeling formalisms Requirements specifications Software systems Automata theory Revisiting compatibility of input-output modal transition systems |
topic_facet |
Interface states Automata-based formalisms Component implementations External behavior Interface automata Modal Transition Systems Modeling formalisms Requirements specifications Software systems Automata theory |
description |
Modern software systems are typically built of components that communicate through their external interfaces. The external behavior of a component can be effectively described using finite state automata-based formalisms. Such component models can then used for varied analyses. For example, interface automata, which model the behavior of components in terms of component states and transitions between them, can be used to check whether the resulting system is compatible. By contrast, partial-behavior modeling formalisms, such as modal transition systems, can be used to capture and then verify properties of sets of prospective component implementations that satisfy an incomplete requirements specification. In this paper, we study how pairwise compatibility should be defined for partial-behavior models. To this end, we describe the limitations of the existing compatibility definitions, propose a set of novel compatibility notions for modal interface automata, and propose efficient, correct, and complete compatibility checking procedures © 2014 Springer International Publishing Switzerland. |
title |
Revisiting compatibility of input-output modal transition systems |
title_short |
Revisiting compatibility of input-output modal transition systems |
title_full |
Revisiting compatibility of input-output modal transition systems |
title_fullStr |
Revisiting compatibility of input-output modal transition systems |
title_full_unstemmed |
Revisiting compatibility of input-output modal transition systems |
title_sort |
revisiting compatibility of input-output modal transition systems |
publishDate |
2014 |
url |
https://bibliotecadigital.exactas.uba.ar/collection/paper/document/paper_03029743_v8442LNCS_n_p367_Krka http://hdl.handle.net/20.500.12110/paper_03029743_v8442LNCS_n_p367_Krka |
_version_ |
1768545328213000192 |