Cenozoic intraplate tectonics in Central Patagonia: Record of main Andean phases in a weak upper plate

Contraction in intraplate areas is still poorly understood relative to similar deformation at plate margins. In order to contribute to its comprehension, we study the Patagonian broken foreland (PBF) in South America whose evolution remains controversial. Time constraints of tectonic events and stru...

Descripción completa

Guardado en:
Detalles Bibliográficos
Publicado: 2017
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://bibliotecadigital.exactas.uba.ar/collection/paper/document/paper_00401951_v721_n_p151_Gianni
http://hdl.handle.net/20.500.12110/paper_00401951_v721_n_p151_Gianni
Aporte de:
id paper:paper_00401951_v721_n_p151_Gianni
record_format dspace
spelling paper:paper_00401951_v721_n_p151_Gianni2023-06-08T15:04:03Z Cenozoic intraplate tectonics in Central Patagonia: Record of main Andean phases in a weak upper plate Andean phases Broken foreland Elastic thickness Growth-strata Intraplate contraction Binary alloys Geochronology Lead Plates (structural components) Volcanic rocks Andean phases Broken foreland Effective elastic thickness Elastic thickness Fold-and-thrust belts Growth strata High resolution analysis Structural characterization Tectonics Cenozoic deformation elasticity fold and thrust belt foreland basin geochronology geological record intraplate process Miocene Neogene Oligocene plate tectonics rifting uranium-lead dating Andes Patagonia Contraction in intraplate areas is still poorly understood relative to similar deformation at plate margins. In order to contribute to its comprehension, we study the Patagonian broken foreland (PBF) in South America whose evolution remains controversial. Time constraints of tectonic events and structural characterization of this belt are limited. Also, major causes of strain location in this orogen far from the plate margin are enigmatic. To unravel tectonic events, we studied the Cenozoic sedimentary record of the central sector of the Patagonian broken foreland (San Bernardo fold and thrust belt, 44°30′S-46°S) and the Andes (Meseta de Chalia, 46°S) following an approach involving growth-strata detection, U-Pb geochronology and structural modeling. Additionally, we elaborate a high resolution analysis of the effective elastic thickness (Te) to examine the relation between intraplate contraction location and variations in lithospheric strength. The occurrence of Eocene growth-strata (~ 44–40 Ma) suggests that contraction in the Andes and the Patagonian broken foreland was linked to the Incaic phase. Detection of synextensional deposits suggests that the broken foreland collapsed partially during Oligocene to early Miocene. During middle Miocene times, the Quechua contractional phase produced folding of Neogene volcanic rocks and olistostrome deposition at ~ 17 Ma. Finally, the presented Te map shows that intraplate contraction related to Andean phases localized preferentially along weak lithospheric zones (Te < 15 km). Hence, the observed strain distribution in the PBF appears to be controlled by lateral variations in the lithospheric strength. Variations in this parameter could be related to thermo-mechanical weakening produced by intraplate rifting in Paleozoic-Mesozoic times. © 2017 Elsevier B.V. 2017 https://bibliotecadigital.exactas.uba.ar/collection/paper/document/paper_00401951_v721_n_p151_Gianni http://hdl.handle.net/20.500.12110/paper_00401951_v721_n_p151_Gianni
institution Universidad de Buenos Aires
institution_str I-28
repository_str R-134
collection Biblioteca Digital - Facultad de Ciencias Exactas y Naturales (UBA)
topic Andean phases
Broken foreland
Elastic thickness
Growth-strata
Intraplate contraction
Binary alloys
Geochronology
Lead
Plates (structural components)
Volcanic rocks
Andean phases
Broken foreland
Effective elastic thickness
Elastic thickness
Fold-and-thrust belts
Growth strata
High resolution analysis
Structural characterization
Tectonics
Cenozoic
deformation
elasticity
fold and thrust belt
foreland basin
geochronology
geological record
intraplate process
Miocene
Neogene
Oligocene
plate tectonics
rifting
uranium-lead dating
Andes
Patagonia
spellingShingle Andean phases
Broken foreland
Elastic thickness
Growth-strata
Intraplate contraction
Binary alloys
Geochronology
Lead
Plates (structural components)
Volcanic rocks
Andean phases
Broken foreland
Effective elastic thickness
Elastic thickness
Fold-and-thrust belts
Growth strata
High resolution analysis
Structural characterization
Tectonics
Cenozoic
deformation
elasticity
fold and thrust belt
foreland basin
geochronology
geological record
intraplate process
Miocene
Neogene
Oligocene
plate tectonics
rifting
uranium-lead dating
Andes
Patagonia
Cenozoic intraplate tectonics in Central Patagonia: Record of main Andean phases in a weak upper plate
topic_facet Andean phases
Broken foreland
Elastic thickness
Growth-strata
Intraplate contraction
Binary alloys
Geochronology
Lead
Plates (structural components)
Volcanic rocks
Andean phases
Broken foreland
Effective elastic thickness
Elastic thickness
Fold-and-thrust belts
Growth strata
High resolution analysis
Structural characterization
Tectonics
Cenozoic
deformation
elasticity
fold and thrust belt
foreland basin
geochronology
geological record
intraplate process
Miocene
Neogene
Oligocene
plate tectonics
rifting
uranium-lead dating
Andes
Patagonia
description Contraction in intraplate areas is still poorly understood relative to similar deformation at plate margins. In order to contribute to its comprehension, we study the Patagonian broken foreland (PBF) in South America whose evolution remains controversial. Time constraints of tectonic events and structural characterization of this belt are limited. Also, major causes of strain location in this orogen far from the plate margin are enigmatic. To unravel tectonic events, we studied the Cenozoic sedimentary record of the central sector of the Patagonian broken foreland (San Bernardo fold and thrust belt, 44°30′S-46°S) and the Andes (Meseta de Chalia, 46°S) following an approach involving growth-strata detection, U-Pb geochronology and structural modeling. Additionally, we elaborate a high resolution analysis of the effective elastic thickness (Te) to examine the relation between intraplate contraction location and variations in lithospheric strength. The occurrence of Eocene growth-strata (~ 44–40 Ma) suggests that contraction in the Andes and the Patagonian broken foreland was linked to the Incaic phase. Detection of synextensional deposits suggests that the broken foreland collapsed partially during Oligocene to early Miocene. During middle Miocene times, the Quechua contractional phase produced folding of Neogene volcanic rocks and olistostrome deposition at ~ 17 Ma. Finally, the presented Te map shows that intraplate contraction related to Andean phases localized preferentially along weak lithospheric zones (Te < 15 km). Hence, the observed strain distribution in the PBF appears to be controlled by lateral variations in the lithospheric strength. Variations in this parameter could be related to thermo-mechanical weakening produced by intraplate rifting in Paleozoic-Mesozoic times. © 2017 Elsevier B.V.
title Cenozoic intraplate tectonics in Central Patagonia: Record of main Andean phases in a weak upper plate
title_short Cenozoic intraplate tectonics in Central Patagonia: Record of main Andean phases in a weak upper plate
title_full Cenozoic intraplate tectonics in Central Patagonia: Record of main Andean phases in a weak upper plate
title_fullStr Cenozoic intraplate tectonics in Central Patagonia: Record of main Andean phases in a weak upper plate
title_full_unstemmed Cenozoic intraplate tectonics in Central Patagonia: Record of main Andean phases in a weak upper plate
title_sort cenozoic intraplate tectonics in central patagonia: record of main andean phases in a weak upper plate
publishDate 2017
url https://bibliotecadigital.exactas.uba.ar/collection/paper/document/paper_00401951_v721_n_p151_Gianni
http://hdl.handle.net/20.500.12110/paper_00401951_v721_n_p151_Gianni
_version_ 1768543126771728384