Using branch and basal trunk sap flow measurements to estimate whole-plant water capacitance: Comment on Burgess and Dawson (2008)

Sap flow sensors are uniquely able to continuously monitor whole tree physiology. Recently, Burgess and Dawson (Burgess SSO, Dawson TE, Plant Soil 305:5-13, 2008) urged caution in using sap flow probes to estimate water storage use in trees. Here we respond to three criticisms raised there: (1) Samp...

Descripción completa

Guardado en:
Detalles Bibliográficos
Publicado: 2009
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://bibliotecadigital.exactas.uba.ar/collection/paper/document/paper_0032079X_v315_n1-2_p315_Phillips
http://hdl.handle.net/20.500.12110/paper_0032079X_v315_n1-2_p315_Phillips
Aporte de:
id paper:paper_0032079X_v315_n1-2_p315_Phillips
record_format dspace
spelling paper:paper_0032079X_v315_n1-2_p315_Phillips2023-06-08T14:59:56Z Using branch and basal trunk sap flow measurements to estimate whole-plant water capacitance: Comment on Burgess and Dawson (2008) Branch sap flow Capacitance Cohesion-tension theory Flow lags Heat balance gauge Heat pulse Heat storage Stem water storage Thermal dissipation probe Water transport artifact cohesion dissipation heat balance sampling sap flow tension water storage Sap flow sensors are uniquely able to continuously monitor whole tree physiology. Recently, Burgess and Dawson (Burgess SSO, Dawson TE, Plant Soil 305:5-13, 2008) urged caution in using sap flow probes to estimate water storage use in trees. Here we respond to three criticisms raised there: (1) Sampling: that tree water storage, estimated from branch-bole sap flow lags, was compromised by unaccounted variation in branch position and orientation; (2) Instrumentation: that sap flow sensor response times may be sensor artefacts rather than manifestations of tree water storage; and (3) Theory: that tree water storage estimates are based on a faulty concept of lag phenomena in sap flow that persists in the literature. We agree with the need for caution in sap flow-based estimates of plant water storage, but here correct flaws in arguments and representations of studies presented in Burgess and Dawson (Burgess SSO, Dawson TE, Plant Soil 305:5-13, 2008). © 2008 Springer Science+Business Media B.V. 2009 https://bibliotecadigital.exactas.uba.ar/collection/paper/document/paper_0032079X_v315_n1-2_p315_Phillips http://hdl.handle.net/20.500.12110/paper_0032079X_v315_n1-2_p315_Phillips
institution Universidad de Buenos Aires
institution_str I-28
repository_str R-134
collection Biblioteca Digital - Facultad de Ciencias Exactas y Naturales (UBA)
topic Branch sap flow
Capacitance
Cohesion-tension theory
Flow lags
Heat balance gauge
Heat pulse
Heat storage
Stem water storage
Thermal dissipation probe
Water transport
artifact
cohesion
dissipation
heat balance
sampling
sap flow
tension
water storage
spellingShingle Branch sap flow
Capacitance
Cohesion-tension theory
Flow lags
Heat balance gauge
Heat pulse
Heat storage
Stem water storage
Thermal dissipation probe
Water transport
artifact
cohesion
dissipation
heat balance
sampling
sap flow
tension
water storage
Using branch and basal trunk sap flow measurements to estimate whole-plant water capacitance: Comment on Burgess and Dawson (2008)
topic_facet Branch sap flow
Capacitance
Cohesion-tension theory
Flow lags
Heat balance gauge
Heat pulse
Heat storage
Stem water storage
Thermal dissipation probe
Water transport
artifact
cohesion
dissipation
heat balance
sampling
sap flow
tension
water storage
description Sap flow sensors are uniquely able to continuously monitor whole tree physiology. Recently, Burgess and Dawson (Burgess SSO, Dawson TE, Plant Soil 305:5-13, 2008) urged caution in using sap flow probes to estimate water storage use in trees. Here we respond to three criticisms raised there: (1) Sampling: that tree water storage, estimated from branch-bole sap flow lags, was compromised by unaccounted variation in branch position and orientation; (2) Instrumentation: that sap flow sensor response times may be sensor artefacts rather than manifestations of tree water storage; and (3) Theory: that tree water storage estimates are based on a faulty concept of lag phenomena in sap flow that persists in the literature. We agree with the need for caution in sap flow-based estimates of plant water storage, but here correct flaws in arguments and representations of studies presented in Burgess and Dawson (Burgess SSO, Dawson TE, Plant Soil 305:5-13, 2008). © 2008 Springer Science+Business Media B.V.
title Using branch and basal trunk sap flow measurements to estimate whole-plant water capacitance: Comment on Burgess and Dawson (2008)
title_short Using branch and basal trunk sap flow measurements to estimate whole-plant water capacitance: Comment on Burgess and Dawson (2008)
title_full Using branch and basal trunk sap flow measurements to estimate whole-plant water capacitance: Comment on Burgess and Dawson (2008)
title_fullStr Using branch and basal trunk sap flow measurements to estimate whole-plant water capacitance: Comment on Burgess and Dawson (2008)
title_full_unstemmed Using branch and basal trunk sap flow measurements to estimate whole-plant water capacitance: Comment on Burgess and Dawson (2008)
title_sort using branch and basal trunk sap flow measurements to estimate whole-plant water capacitance: comment on burgess and dawson (2008)
publishDate 2009
url https://bibliotecadigital.exactas.uba.ar/collection/paper/document/paper_0032079X_v315_n1-2_p315_Phillips
http://hdl.handle.net/20.500.12110/paper_0032079X_v315_n1-2_p315_Phillips
_version_ 1768545039436218368