A deterrent response in honeybee (Apis mellifera) foragers: Dependence on disturbance and season

The release of scents by honeybees Apis mellifera was studied in an experimental design that involved two bees: one caught and disturbed in a confinement vial (A-bee) and another introduced in a matrass (B-bee) and afterwards confronted with the confinement vial while trying to escape to the light....

Descripción completa

Guardado en:
Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Núñez, Josué Antonio, Giurfa, Martín
Publicado: 1996
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://bibliotecadigital.exactas.uba.ar/collection/paper/document/paper_00221910_v42_n5_p463_Balderrama
http://hdl.handle.net/20.500.12110/paper_00221910_v42_n5_p463_Balderrama
Aporte de:
id paper:paper_00221910_v42_n5_p463_Balderrama
record_format dspace
spelling paper:paper_00221910_v42_n5_p463_Balderrama2023-06-08T14:47:08Z A deterrent response in honeybee (Apis mellifera) foragers: Dependence on disturbance and season Núñez, Josué Antonio Giurfa, Martín Apis mellifera Deterrents Disturbance Honeybees Pheromones The release of scents by honeybees Apis mellifera was studied in an experimental design that involved two bees: one caught and disturbed in a confinement vial (A-bee) and another introduced in a matrass (B-bee) and afterwards confronted with the confinement vial while trying to escape to the light. The time needed by the B-bee to reach the vial bottom was recorded for different disturbances (delay response). Honeybees rejected the vial where another bee was confined; results are thus consistent with the release of deterrents by A-bees. The delay response of B-bees increased with the confinement time and with the pressure applied to A-bees. Pressing was more efficient in eliciting the release of deterrents. Both mandibular glands and sting chamber contributed to the delay response. Beheaded A-bees elicited a greater delay response; thus, the release of substances from the sting chamber may be under the control of a central inhibition that disappears when the head is removed. An annual fluctuation in the delay response occurred. Maximal values were attained shortly after the period of abundant nectar flow. Tests with head- or sting-chamber squashes reveal that such fluctuation was associated with deterrents from the head. These could have an adaptive value in a foraging context. Copyright © 1996 Elsevier Science Ltd. Fil:Núñez, J. Universidad de Buenos Aires. Facultad de Ciencias Exactas y Naturales; Argentina. Fil:Giurfa, M. Universidad de Buenos Aires. Facultad de Ciencias Exactas y Naturales; Argentina. 1996 https://bibliotecadigital.exactas.uba.ar/collection/paper/document/paper_00221910_v42_n5_p463_Balderrama http://hdl.handle.net/20.500.12110/paper_00221910_v42_n5_p463_Balderrama
institution Universidad de Buenos Aires
institution_str I-28
repository_str R-134
collection Biblioteca Digital - Facultad de Ciencias Exactas y Naturales (UBA)
topic Apis mellifera
Deterrents
Disturbance
Honeybees
Pheromones
spellingShingle Apis mellifera
Deterrents
Disturbance
Honeybees
Pheromones
Núñez, Josué Antonio
Giurfa, Martín
A deterrent response in honeybee (Apis mellifera) foragers: Dependence on disturbance and season
topic_facet Apis mellifera
Deterrents
Disturbance
Honeybees
Pheromones
description The release of scents by honeybees Apis mellifera was studied in an experimental design that involved two bees: one caught and disturbed in a confinement vial (A-bee) and another introduced in a matrass (B-bee) and afterwards confronted with the confinement vial while trying to escape to the light. The time needed by the B-bee to reach the vial bottom was recorded for different disturbances (delay response). Honeybees rejected the vial where another bee was confined; results are thus consistent with the release of deterrents by A-bees. The delay response of B-bees increased with the confinement time and with the pressure applied to A-bees. Pressing was more efficient in eliciting the release of deterrents. Both mandibular glands and sting chamber contributed to the delay response. Beheaded A-bees elicited a greater delay response; thus, the release of substances from the sting chamber may be under the control of a central inhibition that disappears when the head is removed. An annual fluctuation in the delay response occurred. Maximal values were attained shortly after the period of abundant nectar flow. Tests with head- or sting-chamber squashes reveal that such fluctuation was associated with deterrents from the head. These could have an adaptive value in a foraging context. Copyright © 1996 Elsevier Science Ltd.
author Núñez, Josué Antonio
Giurfa, Martín
author_facet Núñez, Josué Antonio
Giurfa, Martín
author_sort Núñez, Josué Antonio
title A deterrent response in honeybee (Apis mellifera) foragers: Dependence on disturbance and season
title_short A deterrent response in honeybee (Apis mellifera) foragers: Dependence on disturbance and season
title_full A deterrent response in honeybee (Apis mellifera) foragers: Dependence on disturbance and season
title_fullStr A deterrent response in honeybee (Apis mellifera) foragers: Dependence on disturbance and season
title_full_unstemmed A deterrent response in honeybee (Apis mellifera) foragers: Dependence on disturbance and season
title_sort deterrent response in honeybee (apis mellifera) foragers: dependence on disturbance and season
publishDate 1996
url https://bibliotecadigital.exactas.uba.ar/collection/paper/document/paper_00221910_v42_n5_p463_Balderrama
http://hdl.handle.net/20.500.12110/paper_00221910_v42_n5_p463_Balderrama
work_keys_str_mv AT nunezjosueantonio adeterrentresponseinhoneybeeapismelliferaforagersdependenceondisturbanceandseason
AT giurfamartin adeterrentresponseinhoneybeeapismelliferaforagersdependenceondisturbanceandseason
AT nunezjosueantonio deterrentresponseinhoneybeeapismelliferaforagersdependenceondisturbanceandseason
AT giurfamartin deterrentresponseinhoneybeeapismelliferaforagersdependenceondisturbanceandseason
_version_ 1768546145698578432