A deterrent response in honeybee (Apis mellifera) foragers: Dependence on disturbance and season
The release of scents by honeybees Apis mellifera was studied in an experimental design that involved two bees: one caught and disturbed in a confinement vial (A-bee) and another introduced in a matrass (B-bee) and afterwards confronted with the confinement vial while trying to escape to the light....
Guardado en:
Autores principales: | , |
---|---|
Publicado: |
1996
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://bibliotecadigital.exactas.uba.ar/collection/paper/document/paper_00221910_v42_n5_p463_Balderrama http://hdl.handle.net/20.500.12110/paper_00221910_v42_n5_p463_Balderrama |
Aporte de: |
id |
paper:paper_00221910_v42_n5_p463_Balderrama |
---|---|
record_format |
dspace |
spelling |
paper:paper_00221910_v42_n5_p463_Balderrama2023-06-08T14:47:08Z A deterrent response in honeybee (Apis mellifera) foragers: Dependence on disturbance and season Núñez, Josué Antonio Giurfa, Martín Apis mellifera Deterrents Disturbance Honeybees Pheromones The release of scents by honeybees Apis mellifera was studied in an experimental design that involved two bees: one caught and disturbed in a confinement vial (A-bee) and another introduced in a matrass (B-bee) and afterwards confronted with the confinement vial while trying to escape to the light. The time needed by the B-bee to reach the vial bottom was recorded for different disturbances (delay response). Honeybees rejected the vial where another bee was confined; results are thus consistent with the release of deterrents by A-bees. The delay response of B-bees increased with the confinement time and with the pressure applied to A-bees. Pressing was more efficient in eliciting the release of deterrents. Both mandibular glands and sting chamber contributed to the delay response. Beheaded A-bees elicited a greater delay response; thus, the release of substances from the sting chamber may be under the control of a central inhibition that disappears when the head is removed. An annual fluctuation in the delay response occurred. Maximal values were attained shortly after the period of abundant nectar flow. Tests with head- or sting-chamber squashes reveal that such fluctuation was associated with deterrents from the head. These could have an adaptive value in a foraging context. Copyright © 1996 Elsevier Science Ltd. Fil:Núñez, J. Universidad de Buenos Aires. Facultad de Ciencias Exactas y Naturales; Argentina. Fil:Giurfa, M. Universidad de Buenos Aires. Facultad de Ciencias Exactas y Naturales; Argentina. 1996 https://bibliotecadigital.exactas.uba.ar/collection/paper/document/paper_00221910_v42_n5_p463_Balderrama http://hdl.handle.net/20.500.12110/paper_00221910_v42_n5_p463_Balderrama |
institution |
Universidad de Buenos Aires |
institution_str |
I-28 |
repository_str |
R-134 |
collection |
Biblioteca Digital - Facultad de Ciencias Exactas y Naturales (UBA) |
topic |
Apis mellifera Deterrents Disturbance Honeybees Pheromones |
spellingShingle |
Apis mellifera Deterrents Disturbance Honeybees Pheromones Núñez, Josué Antonio Giurfa, Martín A deterrent response in honeybee (Apis mellifera) foragers: Dependence on disturbance and season |
topic_facet |
Apis mellifera Deterrents Disturbance Honeybees Pheromones |
description |
The release of scents by honeybees Apis mellifera was studied in an experimental design that involved two bees: one caught and disturbed in a confinement vial (A-bee) and another introduced in a matrass (B-bee) and afterwards confronted with the confinement vial while trying to escape to the light. The time needed by the B-bee to reach the vial bottom was recorded for different disturbances (delay response). Honeybees rejected the vial where another bee was confined; results are thus consistent with the release of deterrents by A-bees. The delay response of B-bees increased with the confinement time and with the pressure applied to A-bees. Pressing was more efficient in eliciting the release of deterrents. Both mandibular glands and sting chamber contributed to the delay response. Beheaded A-bees elicited a greater delay response; thus, the release of substances from the sting chamber may be under the control of a central inhibition that disappears when the head is removed. An annual fluctuation in the delay response occurred. Maximal values were attained shortly after the period of abundant nectar flow. Tests with head- or sting-chamber squashes reveal that such fluctuation was associated with deterrents from the head. These could have an adaptive value in a foraging context. Copyright © 1996 Elsevier Science Ltd. |
author |
Núñez, Josué Antonio Giurfa, Martín |
author_facet |
Núñez, Josué Antonio Giurfa, Martín |
author_sort |
Núñez, Josué Antonio |
title |
A deterrent response in honeybee (Apis mellifera) foragers: Dependence on disturbance and season |
title_short |
A deterrent response in honeybee (Apis mellifera) foragers: Dependence on disturbance and season |
title_full |
A deterrent response in honeybee (Apis mellifera) foragers: Dependence on disturbance and season |
title_fullStr |
A deterrent response in honeybee (Apis mellifera) foragers: Dependence on disturbance and season |
title_full_unstemmed |
A deterrent response in honeybee (Apis mellifera) foragers: Dependence on disturbance and season |
title_sort |
deterrent response in honeybee (apis mellifera) foragers: dependence on disturbance and season |
publishDate |
1996 |
url |
https://bibliotecadigital.exactas.uba.ar/collection/paper/document/paper_00221910_v42_n5_p463_Balderrama http://hdl.handle.net/20.500.12110/paper_00221910_v42_n5_p463_Balderrama |
work_keys_str_mv |
AT nunezjosueantonio adeterrentresponseinhoneybeeapismelliferaforagersdependenceondisturbanceandseason AT giurfamartin adeterrentresponseinhoneybeeapismelliferaforagersdependenceondisturbanceandseason AT nunezjosueantonio deterrentresponseinhoneybeeapismelliferaforagersdependenceondisturbanceandseason AT giurfamartin deterrentresponseinhoneybeeapismelliferaforagersdependenceondisturbanceandseason |
_version_ |
1768546145698578432 |