Individual consistency in the accuracy and distribution of confidence judgments

We examine which aspects of the confidence distributions - its shape, its bias toward higher or lower values, and its ability to distinguish correct from erred trials - are idiosyncratic of the who (individual specificity), the when (variability across days) and the what (task specificity). Measurin...

Descripción completa

Guardado en:
Detalles Bibliográficos
Autor principal: Sigman, Mariano
Publicado: 2016
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://bibliotecadigital.exactas.uba.ar/collection/paper/document/paper_00100277_v146_n_p377_Ais
http://hdl.handle.net/20.500.12110/paper_00100277_v146_n_p377_Ais
Aporte de:
id paper:paper_00100277_v146_n_p377_Ais
record_format dspace
spelling paper:paper_00100277_v146_n_p377_Ais2023-06-08T14:34:12Z Individual consistency in the accuracy and distribution of confidence judgments Sigman, Mariano Confidence Metacognitive judgments Perceptual decisions Psychophysics accuracy adult Article cognitive bias decision making female human human experiment internal consistency male optimism pessimism priority journal questionnaire task performance decision making metacognition perception physiology young adult Adult Female Humans Judgment Male Metacognition Perception Young Adult We examine which aspects of the confidence distributions - its shape, its bias toward higher or lower values, and its ability to distinguish correct from erred trials - are idiosyncratic of the who (individual specificity), the when (variability across days) and the what (task specificity). Measuring confidence across different sessions of four different perceptual tasks we show that: (1) Confidence distributions are virtually identical when measured in different days for the same subject and the same task, constituting a subjective fingerprint, (2) The capacity of confidence reports to distinguish correct from incorrect responses is only modestly (but significantly) correlated when compared across tasks, (3) Confidence distributions are very similar for tasks that involve different sensory modalities but have similar structure, (4) Confidence accuracy is independent of the mean and width of the confidence distribution, (5) The mean of the confidence distribution (an individual's confidence bias) constitutes the most efficient indicator to infer a subject's identity from confidence reports and (6) Confidence bias measured in simple perceptual decisions correlates with an individual's optimism bias measured with standard questionnaire. © 2015 Elsevier B.V. Fil:Sigman, M. Universidad de Buenos Aires. Facultad de Ciencias Exactas y Naturales; Argentina. 2016 https://bibliotecadigital.exactas.uba.ar/collection/paper/document/paper_00100277_v146_n_p377_Ais http://hdl.handle.net/20.500.12110/paper_00100277_v146_n_p377_Ais
institution Universidad de Buenos Aires
institution_str I-28
repository_str R-134
collection Biblioteca Digital - Facultad de Ciencias Exactas y Naturales (UBA)
topic Confidence
Metacognitive judgments
Perceptual decisions
Psychophysics
accuracy
adult
Article
cognitive bias
decision making
female
human
human experiment
internal consistency
male
optimism
pessimism
priority journal
questionnaire
task performance
decision making
metacognition
perception
physiology
young adult
Adult
Female
Humans
Judgment
Male
Metacognition
Perception
Young Adult
spellingShingle Confidence
Metacognitive judgments
Perceptual decisions
Psychophysics
accuracy
adult
Article
cognitive bias
decision making
female
human
human experiment
internal consistency
male
optimism
pessimism
priority journal
questionnaire
task performance
decision making
metacognition
perception
physiology
young adult
Adult
Female
Humans
Judgment
Male
Metacognition
Perception
Young Adult
Sigman, Mariano
Individual consistency in the accuracy and distribution of confidence judgments
topic_facet Confidence
Metacognitive judgments
Perceptual decisions
Psychophysics
accuracy
adult
Article
cognitive bias
decision making
female
human
human experiment
internal consistency
male
optimism
pessimism
priority journal
questionnaire
task performance
decision making
metacognition
perception
physiology
young adult
Adult
Female
Humans
Judgment
Male
Metacognition
Perception
Young Adult
description We examine which aspects of the confidence distributions - its shape, its bias toward higher or lower values, and its ability to distinguish correct from erred trials - are idiosyncratic of the who (individual specificity), the when (variability across days) and the what (task specificity). Measuring confidence across different sessions of four different perceptual tasks we show that: (1) Confidence distributions are virtually identical when measured in different days for the same subject and the same task, constituting a subjective fingerprint, (2) The capacity of confidence reports to distinguish correct from incorrect responses is only modestly (but significantly) correlated when compared across tasks, (3) Confidence distributions are very similar for tasks that involve different sensory modalities but have similar structure, (4) Confidence accuracy is independent of the mean and width of the confidence distribution, (5) The mean of the confidence distribution (an individual's confidence bias) constitutes the most efficient indicator to infer a subject's identity from confidence reports and (6) Confidence bias measured in simple perceptual decisions correlates with an individual's optimism bias measured with standard questionnaire. © 2015 Elsevier B.V.
author Sigman, Mariano
author_facet Sigman, Mariano
author_sort Sigman, Mariano
title Individual consistency in the accuracy and distribution of confidence judgments
title_short Individual consistency in the accuracy and distribution of confidence judgments
title_full Individual consistency in the accuracy and distribution of confidence judgments
title_fullStr Individual consistency in the accuracy and distribution of confidence judgments
title_full_unstemmed Individual consistency in the accuracy and distribution of confidence judgments
title_sort individual consistency in the accuracy and distribution of confidence judgments
publishDate 2016
url https://bibliotecadigital.exactas.uba.ar/collection/paper/document/paper_00100277_v146_n_p377_Ais
http://hdl.handle.net/20.500.12110/paper_00100277_v146_n_p377_Ais
work_keys_str_mv AT sigmanmariano individualconsistencyintheaccuracyanddistributionofconfidencejudgments
_version_ 1768543354449035264