Influence of livestock grazing on the capybara's trophic niche and forage preferences

Trophic niche parameters and forage preferences of capybara Hydrochaeris hydrochaeris Linnaeus, 1766 were studied at three areas of east-central Argentina: Lower Delta Islands (LDI), only capybara present; Puerto Constanza (PC), capybara and cattle, and Villaguay (VI), capybara, cattle and sheep. Si...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Publicado: 2002
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://bibliotecadigital.exactas.uba.ar/collection/paper/document/paper_00017051_v47_n2_p175_Quintana
http://hdl.handle.net/20.500.12110/paper_00017051_v47_n2_p175_Quintana
Aporte de:
id paper:paper_00017051_v47_n2_p175_Quintana
record_format dspace
spelling paper:paper_00017051_v47_n2_p175_Quintana2023-06-08T14:21:06Z Influence of livestock grazing on the capybara's trophic niche and forage preferences Argentina Feeding habits Hydrochaeris hydrochaeris Paraná River Wetlands food preference grazing livestock niche wetland Argentina Animalia Bos taurus Carex Carex hyalinolepis Carex riparia Cynodon Cynodon dactylon Cynodon dactylon Hydrochaeris hydrochaeris Hydrochaeris hydrochaeris Ovis aries Panicum Panicum grumosum Panicum grumosum Panicum milioides Panicum milioides Riparia Trophic niche parameters and forage preferences of capybara Hydrochaeris hydrochaeris Linnaeus, 1766 were studied at three areas of east-central Argentina: Lower Delta Islands (LDI), only capybara present; Puerto Constanza (PC), capybara and cattle, and Villaguay (VI), capybara, cattle and sheep. Significant correlation was found in the annual botanical composition of capybara faeces at LDI and PC, but no correlation was found between faecal composition at these two areas and those at VI. The narrowest trophic niche corresponded to LDI, while the widest corresponded to VI, with significant differences in the values among the three areas. Capybara consumed Carex riparia, Cynodon dactylon and Panicum grumosum in LDI, and P. milioides in VI in proportion greater than availability. Three and eight food items were consumed less than availability in VI and PC, respectively. The greater the species number and density of livestock animals, the more generalist the behavior of capybara, possibly due to direct interaction in the use of grazing resources. Changes in availability of foraging species may influence the capybara's preference patterns and the consumption of suboptimal feeding items may indicate a greater pressure on foraging resources in the areas where capybaras share their habitat with livestock. 2002 https://bibliotecadigital.exactas.uba.ar/collection/paper/document/paper_00017051_v47_n2_p175_Quintana http://hdl.handle.net/20.500.12110/paper_00017051_v47_n2_p175_Quintana
institution Universidad de Buenos Aires
institution_str I-28
repository_str R-134
collection Biblioteca Digital - Facultad de Ciencias Exactas y Naturales (UBA)
topic Argentina
Feeding habits
Hydrochaeris hydrochaeris
Paraná
River
Wetlands
food preference
grazing
livestock
niche
wetland
Argentina
Animalia
Bos taurus
Carex
Carex hyalinolepis
Carex riparia
Cynodon
Cynodon dactylon
Cynodon dactylon
Hydrochaeris hydrochaeris
Hydrochaeris hydrochaeris
Ovis aries
Panicum
Panicum grumosum
Panicum grumosum
Panicum milioides
Panicum milioides
Riparia
spellingShingle Argentina
Feeding habits
Hydrochaeris hydrochaeris
Paraná
River
Wetlands
food preference
grazing
livestock
niche
wetland
Argentina
Animalia
Bos taurus
Carex
Carex hyalinolepis
Carex riparia
Cynodon
Cynodon dactylon
Cynodon dactylon
Hydrochaeris hydrochaeris
Hydrochaeris hydrochaeris
Ovis aries
Panicum
Panicum grumosum
Panicum grumosum
Panicum milioides
Panicum milioides
Riparia
Influence of livestock grazing on the capybara's trophic niche and forage preferences
topic_facet Argentina
Feeding habits
Hydrochaeris hydrochaeris
Paraná
River
Wetlands
food preference
grazing
livestock
niche
wetland
Argentina
Animalia
Bos taurus
Carex
Carex hyalinolepis
Carex riparia
Cynodon
Cynodon dactylon
Cynodon dactylon
Hydrochaeris hydrochaeris
Hydrochaeris hydrochaeris
Ovis aries
Panicum
Panicum grumosum
Panicum grumosum
Panicum milioides
Panicum milioides
Riparia
description Trophic niche parameters and forage preferences of capybara Hydrochaeris hydrochaeris Linnaeus, 1766 were studied at three areas of east-central Argentina: Lower Delta Islands (LDI), only capybara present; Puerto Constanza (PC), capybara and cattle, and Villaguay (VI), capybara, cattle and sheep. Significant correlation was found in the annual botanical composition of capybara faeces at LDI and PC, but no correlation was found between faecal composition at these two areas and those at VI. The narrowest trophic niche corresponded to LDI, while the widest corresponded to VI, with significant differences in the values among the three areas. Capybara consumed Carex riparia, Cynodon dactylon and Panicum grumosum in LDI, and P. milioides in VI in proportion greater than availability. Three and eight food items were consumed less than availability in VI and PC, respectively. The greater the species number and density of livestock animals, the more generalist the behavior of capybara, possibly due to direct interaction in the use of grazing resources. Changes in availability of foraging species may influence the capybara's preference patterns and the consumption of suboptimal feeding items may indicate a greater pressure on foraging resources in the areas where capybaras share their habitat with livestock.
title Influence of livestock grazing on the capybara's trophic niche and forage preferences
title_short Influence of livestock grazing on the capybara's trophic niche and forage preferences
title_full Influence of livestock grazing on the capybara's trophic niche and forage preferences
title_fullStr Influence of livestock grazing on the capybara's trophic niche and forage preferences
title_full_unstemmed Influence of livestock grazing on the capybara's trophic niche and forage preferences
title_sort influence of livestock grazing on the capybara's trophic niche and forage preferences
publishDate 2002
url https://bibliotecadigital.exactas.uba.ar/collection/paper/document/paper_00017051_v47_n2_p175_Quintana
http://hdl.handle.net/20.500.12110/paper_00017051_v47_n2_p175_Quintana
_version_ 1768544936090664960