Improvement of bioethanol production from rice husks

This work aimed to compare the production of bioethanol from rice husk through simultaneous hydrolysis and fermentation process (SSF) with that through hydrolysis followed by fermentation process (SHF). The raw material was pretreated under mild conditions with sodium hydroxide. Initially, the influ...

Descripción completa

Guardado en:
Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Arismendy Pabón, Ana María, Felissia, Fernando Esteban, Mendieta, Carolina Mónica, Chamorro, Ester Ramona, Area, María Cristina
Formato: Artículo publisherVersion
Lenguaje:Inglés
Publicado: 2021
Materias:
Acceso en línea:http://hdl.handle.net/20.500.12272/4977
https://doi.org/10.35812/CelluloseChemTechnol.2020.54.68
Aporte de:
id I68-R174-20.500.12272-4977
record_format dspace
institution Universidad Tecnológica Nacional
institution_str I-68
repository_str R-174
collection RIA - Repositorio Institucional Abierto (UTN)
language Inglés
topic rice husk
simultaneous hydrolysis and fermentation
hydrolysis followed by fermentation
yeast
yields
spellingShingle rice husk
simultaneous hydrolysis and fermentation
hydrolysis followed by fermentation
yeast
yields
Arismendy Pabón, Ana María
Felissia, Fernando Esteban
Mendieta, Carolina Mónica
Chamorro, Ester Ramona
Area, María Cristina
Improvement of bioethanol production from rice husks
topic_facet rice husk
simultaneous hydrolysis and fermentation
hydrolysis followed by fermentation
yeast
yields
description This work aimed to compare the production of bioethanol from rice husk through simultaneous hydrolysis and fermentation process (SSF) with that through hydrolysis followed by fermentation process (SHF). The raw material was pretreated under mild conditions with sodium hydroxide. Initially, the influence of particle size was evaluated in the enzymatic hydrolysis of pretreated milled and unmilled husk. Subsequently, the efficiencies of Saccharomyces cerevisiae IMR 1181 (SC 1181) and Saccharomyces cerevisiae IMR 1507 (SC 1507) yeasts were compared using the SSF process. Finally, the SSF and SHF processes were compared using the SC 1181 yeast. Although a little more glucose was generated using ground husk (36.6% vs. 35.5%), grinding costs have to be also considered. The SC1507 yeast performed best at all times. The bioethanol yields for SHF and SSF with SC 1181 were of 35.3% and 38.2%, respectively. Maximum yields in SSF were of 43.9% for SC 1507 and 38%for SC 1181.
format Artículo
publisherVersion
author Arismendy Pabón, Ana María
Felissia, Fernando Esteban
Mendieta, Carolina Mónica
Chamorro, Ester Ramona
Area, María Cristina
author_facet Arismendy Pabón, Ana María
Felissia, Fernando Esteban
Mendieta, Carolina Mónica
Chamorro, Ester Ramona
Area, María Cristina
author_sort Arismendy Pabón, Ana María
title Improvement of bioethanol production from rice husks
title_short Improvement of bioethanol production from rice husks
title_full Improvement of bioethanol production from rice husks
title_fullStr Improvement of bioethanol production from rice husks
title_full_unstemmed Improvement of bioethanol production from rice husks
title_sort improvement of bioethanol production from rice husks
publishDate 2021
url http://hdl.handle.net/20.500.12272/4977
https://doi.org/10.35812/CelluloseChemTechnol.2020.54.68
work_keys_str_mv AT arismendypabonanamaria improvementofbioethanolproductionfromricehusks
AT felissiafernandoesteban improvementofbioethanolproductionfromricehusks
AT mendietacarolinamonica improvementofbioethanolproductionfromricehusks
AT chamorroesterramona improvementofbioethanolproductionfromricehusks
AT areamariacristina improvementofbioethanolproductionfromricehusks
bdutipo_str Repositorios
_version_ 1764820552319500288