Secularization, a valid category? : A reappraisal of the Löwith-Blumenberg debate around the rise of modernity

Abstract: Karl Löwith’s Meaning in History presents the emergence of modern philosophy of history as a secularization of medieval theology of history. His thesis holds that modern historical consciousness transposes into the immanent frame a constitutively transcendent element: the Christian history...

Descripción completa

Guardado en:
Detalles Bibliográficos
Autor principal: Torbidoni, Juan
Formato: Artículo
Lenguaje:Inglés
Publicado: Universidad Católica Argentina. Facultad de Filosofía y Letras. Centro de Estudiantes de Filosofía 2020
Materias:
SECULARIZACION
FILOSOFIA DE LA HISTORIA
TRASCENDENCIA
INMANENCIA
ESCATOLOGIA
Acceso en línea:https://repositorio.uca.edu.ar/handle/123456789/11039
https://doi.org/10.46553/tab.16.2020.p53-69
Aporte de:
Repositorio Institucional de la Universidad Católica Argentina (UCA) de Universidad Católica Argentina
id I33-R139123456789-11039
record_format dspace
institution Universidad Católica Argentina
institution_str I-33
repository_str R-139
collection Repositorio Institucional de la Universidad Católica Argentina (UCA)
language Inglés
topic SECULARIZACION
FILOSOFIA DE LA HISTORIA
TRASCENDENCIA
INMANENCIA
ESCATOLOGIA
spellingShingle SECULARIZACION
FILOSOFIA DE LA HISTORIA
TRASCENDENCIA
INMANENCIA
ESCATOLOGIA
Torbidoni, Juan
Secularization, a valid category? : A reappraisal of the Löwith-Blumenberg debate around the rise of modernity
topic_facet SECULARIZACION
FILOSOFIA DE LA HISTORIA
TRASCENDENCIA
INMANENCIA
ESCATOLOGIA
description Abstract: Karl Löwith’s Meaning in History presents the emergence of modern philosophy of history as a secularization of medieval theology of history. His thesis holds that modern historical consciousness transposes into the immanent frame a constitutively transcendent element: the Christian history of salvation. In The Legitimacy of the Modern Age Hans Blumenberg impugns Löwith’s theory, by arguing that it works on the erroneous assumption that there would be a substantial content originally possessed by medieval Christianity and only later illegitimately appropriated by modernity.
format Artículo
author Torbidoni, Juan
author_facet Torbidoni, Juan
author_sort Torbidoni, Juan
title Secularization, a valid category? : A reappraisal of the Löwith-Blumenberg debate around the rise of modernity
title_short Secularization, a valid category? : A reappraisal of the Löwith-Blumenberg debate around the rise of modernity
title_full Secularization, a valid category? : A reappraisal of the Löwith-Blumenberg debate around the rise of modernity
title_fullStr Secularization, a valid category? : A reappraisal of the Löwith-Blumenberg debate around the rise of modernity
title_full_unstemmed Secularization, a valid category? : A reappraisal of the Löwith-Blumenberg debate around the rise of modernity
title_sort secularization, a valid category? : a reappraisal of the löwith-blumenberg debate around the rise of modernity
publisher Universidad Católica Argentina. Facultad de Filosofía y Letras. Centro de Estudiantes de Filosofía
publishDate 2020
url https://repositorio.uca.edu.ar/handle/123456789/11039
https://doi.org/10.46553/tab.16.2020.p53-69
work_keys_str_mv AT torbidonijuan secularizationavalidcategoryareappraisalofthelowithblumenbergdebatearoundtheriseofmodernity
AT torbidonijuan secularizacionunacategoriavalidaunareevaluaciondeldebatelowithblumenbergentornoalsurgimientodelamodernidad
bdutipo_str Repositorios
_version_ 1764820524262752258

Ejemplares similares