Max Uhle - Julio Tello: A political-academic controversy in the conformation of Peruvian archaeology
Max Uhle (1856-1944) and Julio Tello (1880-1947) made prominent contributions to the development of Peruvian archaeology in the first half of the 20th century, coinciding at some points and differing in others. Their contrasting academic proposals were linked to political positions, which in turn im...
Guardado en:
| Autor principal: | |
|---|---|
| Formato: | Artículo revista |
| Lenguaje: | Español |
| Publicado: |
Instituto de Ciencias Antropológicas, Facultad de Filosofía y Letras, UBA
2013
|
| Materias: | |
| Acceso en línea: | http://revistascientificas.filo.uba.ar/index.php/runa/article/view/643 |
| Aporte de: |
| id |
I28-R265-article-643 |
|---|---|
| record_format |
ojs |
| spelling |
I28-R265-article-6432023-06-27T21:23:02Z Max Uhle - Julio Tello: A political-academic controversy in the conformation of Peruvian archaeology Max Uhle - Julio Tello: Uma polêmica academico-politica na conformação da arqueologia peruana Max Uhle - Julio Tello: una polémica académico-política en la conformación de la Arqueología peruana Ramos, Alejandra Max Uhle Julio Tello Peruvian Archaeology Nationalism History of Ideas Max Uhle Julio Tello Arqueología Peruana Nacionalismo Historia de las Ideas Max Uhle Julio Tello Arqueologia Peruana Nacionalismo História das Idéias Max Uhle (1856-1944) and Julio Tello (1880-1947) made prominent contributions to the development of Peruvian archaeology in the first half of the 20th century, coinciding at some points and differing in others. Their contrasting academic proposals were linked to political positions, which in turn impacted the way of imagining the development of Peruvian archaeology. The article analyzes how the interdependence in the characterizations of Uhle and Tello led to the formation of a mirrored logic, placing them in two poles that condense positive and negative assessments, respectively. Finally, we explore the passage from the opposition of both figures to the construction of exclusive and nationality-dependent ways of doing research. Max Uhle (1856-1944) y Julio Tello (1880-1947) realizaron destacadas contribuciones al desarrollo de la Arqueología peruana en la primera mitad del siglo xx, coincidiendo en algunos puntos y diferenciándose en otros. Los contrastes de sus propuestas académicas fueron vinculados a posicionamientos políticos, lo cual impactó en la forma de concebir el desarrollo de la Arqueología peruana. Analizamos de qué manera la interdependencia en sus caracterizaciones condujo a la conformación de una lógica espejada, situando a Uhle y a Tello en dos polos que condensan valoraciones negativas y positivas, respectivamente. Finalmente, exploramos el pasaje que se dio de la oposición de sus figuras a la construcción de formas de investigar excluyentes y dependientes de la nacionalidad. Max Uhle (1856-1944) e Julio Tello (1880-1947) fizeram importantes contribuições para o desenvolvimento da arqueologia peruana na primeira metade do século XX, concordando em alguns pontos e divergindo em outros.Os contrastes de suas propostas acadêmicas ligavam-se a suas posições políticas, e isso teve um impacto sobre a maneira de conceber o desenvolvimento da arqueologia peruana. Vamos analisar como a interdependência em suas caracterizações levou à formação de uma lógica espelhada, colocando Uhle e Tello em dois pólos que condensam críticas positivas e negativas, respectivamente. Por fim, vamos explorar a passagem da oposição dos dois atores para as maneiras excludentes de investigar, e dependentes da nacionalidade. Instituto de Ciencias Antropológicas, Facultad de Filosofía y Letras, UBA 2013-07-30 info:eu-repo/semantics/article info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion Artículos evaluados por pares application/pdf http://revistascientificas.filo.uba.ar/index.php/runa/article/view/643 10.34096/runa.v34i2.643 RUNA, archivo para las ciencias del hombre; Vol 34 No 2 (2013); 197-214 RUNA, archivo para las ciencias del hombre; Vol. 34 Núm. 2 (2013); 197-214 RUNA, archivo para las ciencias del hombre; v. 34 n. 2 (2013); 197-214 1851-9628 0325-1217 spa http://revistascientificas.filo.uba.ar/index.php/runa/article/view/643/624 |
| institution |
Universidad de Buenos Aires |
| institution_str |
I-28 |
| repository_str |
R-265 |
| container_title_str |
Runa |
| language |
Español |
| format |
Artículo revista |
| topic |
Max Uhle Julio Tello Peruvian Archaeology Nationalism History of Ideas Max Uhle Julio Tello Arqueología Peruana Nacionalismo Historia de las Ideas Max Uhle Julio Tello Arqueologia Peruana Nacionalismo História das Idéias |
| spellingShingle |
Max Uhle Julio Tello Peruvian Archaeology Nationalism History of Ideas Max Uhle Julio Tello Arqueología Peruana Nacionalismo Historia de las Ideas Max Uhle Julio Tello Arqueologia Peruana Nacionalismo História das Idéias Ramos, Alejandra Max Uhle - Julio Tello: A political-academic controversy in the conformation of Peruvian archaeology |
| topic_facet |
Max Uhle Julio Tello Peruvian Archaeology Nationalism History of Ideas Max Uhle Julio Tello Arqueología Peruana Nacionalismo Historia de las Ideas Max Uhle Julio Tello Arqueologia Peruana Nacionalismo História das Idéias |
| author |
Ramos, Alejandra |
| author_facet |
Ramos, Alejandra |
| author_sort |
Ramos, Alejandra |
| title |
Max Uhle - Julio Tello: A political-academic controversy in the conformation of Peruvian archaeology |
| title_short |
Max Uhle - Julio Tello: A political-academic controversy in the conformation of Peruvian archaeology |
| title_full |
Max Uhle - Julio Tello: A political-academic controversy in the conformation of Peruvian archaeology |
| title_fullStr |
Max Uhle - Julio Tello: A political-academic controversy in the conformation of Peruvian archaeology |
| title_full_unstemmed |
Max Uhle - Julio Tello: A political-academic controversy in the conformation of Peruvian archaeology |
| title_sort |
max uhle - julio tello: a political-academic controversy in the conformation of peruvian archaeology |
| description |
Max Uhle (1856-1944) and Julio Tello (1880-1947) made prominent contributions to the development of Peruvian archaeology in the first half of the 20th century, coinciding at some points and differing in others. Their contrasting academic proposals were linked to political positions, which in turn impacted the way of imagining the development of Peruvian archaeology. The article analyzes how the interdependence in the characterizations of Uhle and Tello led to the formation of a mirrored logic, placing them in two poles that condense positive and negative assessments, respectively. Finally, we explore the passage from the opposition of both figures to the construction of exclusive and nationality-dependent ways of doing research. |
| publisher |
Instituto de Ciencias Antropológicas, Facultad de Filosofía y Letras, UBA |
| publishDate |
2013 |
| url |
http://revistascientificas.filo.uba.ar/index.php/runa/article/view/643 |
| work_keys_str_mv |
AT ramosalejandra maxuhlejuliotelloapoliticalacademiccontroversyintheconformationofperuvianarchaeology AT ramosalejandra maxuhlejuliotelloumapolemicaacademicopoliticanaconformacaodaarqueologiaperuana AT ramosalejandra maxuhlejuliotellounapolemicaacademicopoliticaenlaconformaciondelaarqueologiaperuana |
| first_indexed |
2023-06-27T21:25:48Z |
| last_indexed |
2023-06-27T21:25:48Z |
| _version_ |
1769892635178172416 |