La recezione della Topica boeziana nell'Alto Medioevo

Mostrar todas las versiones(2)

The purpose of this study is to focus on the coexistence, during the transmission of the doctrine on the Topics in the early Middle Ages, of two different interpretations: although both emerge from two commentaries on Cicero’s Topics, however, they gave rise to two different readings: the one transm...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autor principal: Magnano, Fiorella
Formato: Artículo revista
Lenguaje:Español
Italiano
Publicado: Facultad de Filosofía y Letras, Universidad de Buenos Aires 2021
Materias:
Boethius
Cicero
dialectic
Topica
Rhetoric
Boecio
Cicerón
dialéctica
retórica
rhetoric
Acceso en línea:http://revistascientificas.filo.uba.ar/index.php/petm/article/view/10035
Aporte de:
Patristica et Mediævalia de Universidad de Buenos Aires
id I28-R260-article-10035
record_format ojs
spelling I28-R260-article-100352023-08-29T17:26:13Z La recezione della Topica boeziana nell'Alto Medioevo The Reception of Boethian Topics in the Early Middle Ages Magnano, Fiorella Boethius Cicero dialectic Topica Rhetoric Boecio Cicerón dialéctica retórica Topica Boethius Cicero dialectic rhetoric Topica The purpose of this study is to focus on the coexistence, during the transmission of the doctrine on the Topics in the early Middle Ages, of two different interpretations: although both emerge from two commentaries on Cicero’s Topics, however, they gave rise to two different readings: the one transmitted by Marius Victorinus (ca. 280-365 AC) who thought the topics almost exclusively in the service of Rhetoric, the other conceived by Boethius (ca. 480-524 AC) who intended to restore the centrality that the Topics had in the Aristotelian Logic, by subordinating the rethorical Topics to dialectical Topics. My conclusion is that the Early Middle Ages can be considered, from an epistemological point of view, as a long boetiana aetas. Although the corpus of Boethius’s logical writings was not yet available until the second half of the 11th century, Boethius’s methodological approach on the Topics somehow continued to support the slow but constant absorption of the topical doctrine into the new Christian sensibility. El propósito de este estudio es el de centrar la atención sobre la coexistencia, en el curso de la transmisión de la doctrina de los loci en el Alto Medioevo de dos interpretaciones, las cuales, aunque surjan ambas de un comentario a los Topica de Cicerón, han originado una diversa, aunque notable flexión interpretativa del texto ciceroniano: el primer comentario realizado por Mario Victorino (c. 280-365 d.C.), el cual concibió los loci casi exclusivamente al servicio de la Retórica, el segundo llevado a cabo por Boecio (c. 480-524 d.C.) quien, por su parte, intentó restaurar la centralidad que los Topica tuvieron en la lógica aristotélica, subordinando los loci retóricos a los loci dialécticos. Mi conclusión es que la Alta Edad Media puede ser considerada con justa razón desde un punto de vista epistemológico como una larga boetiana aetas. Aunque el corpus de los escritos de lógica boeciana no estuviera disponible sino hasta la segunda mitad del siglo XI, Boecio de algún modo continuó sosteniendo con su impostación de método el esqueleto de la nueva estructura especulativo-teológica. The purpose of this study is to focus on the coexistence, during the transmission of the doctrine on the Topics in the early Middle Ages, of two different interpretations: although both emerge from two commentaries on Cicero’s Topics, however, they gave rise to two different readings: the one transmitted by Marius Victorinus (ca. 280-365 AC) who thought the topics almost exclusively in the service of Rhetoric, the other conceived by Boethius (ca. 480-524 AC) who intended to restore the centrality that the Topics had in the Aristotelian Logic, by subordinating the rethorical Topics to dialectical Topics. My conclusion is that the Early Middle Ages can be considered, from an epistemological point of view, as a long boetiana aetas. Although the corpus of Boethius’s logical writings was not yet available until the second half of the 11th century, Boethius’s methodological approach on the Topics somehow continued to support the slow but constant absorption of the topical doctrine into the new Christian sensibility. Facultad de Filosofía y Letras, Universidad de Buenos Aires 2021-12-13 info:eu-repo/semantics/article info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion application/pdf application/pdf http://revistascientificas.filo.uba.ar/index.php/petm/article/view/10035 10.34096/petm.v42.n2.10035 Patristica et Mediævalia; Vol. 42 Núm. 2 (2021); 33-61 2683-9636 0325-2280 spa ita http://revistascientificas.filo.uba.ar/index.php/petm/article/view/10035/9720 http://revistascientificas.filo.uba.ar/index.php/petm/article/view/10035/9721
institution Universidad de Buenos Aires
institution_str I-28
repository_str R-260
container_title_str Patristica et Mediævalia
language Español
Italiano
format Artículo revista
topic Boethius
Cicero
dialectic
Topica
Rhetoric
Boecio
Cicerón
dialéctica
retórica
Topica
Boethius
Cicero
dialectic
rhetoric
Topica
spellingShingle Boethius
Cicero
dialectic
Topica
Rhetoric
Boecio
Cicerón
dialéctica
retórica
Topica
Boethius
Cicero
dialectic
rhetoric
Topica
Magnano, Fiorella
La recezione della Topica boeziana nell'Alto Medioevo
topic_facet Boethius
Cicero
dialectic
Topica
Rhetoric
Boecio
Cicerón
dialéctica
retórica
Topica
Boethius
Cicero
dialectic
rhetoric
Topica
author Magnano, Fiorella
author_facet Magnano, Fiorella
author_sort Magnano, Fiorella
title La recezione della Topica boeziana nell'Alto Medioevo
title_short La recezione della Topica boeziana nell'Alto Medioevo
title_full La recezione della Topica boeziana nell'Alto Medioevo
title_fullStr La recezione della Topica boeziana nell'Alto Medioevo
title_full_unstemmed La recezione della Topica boeziana nell'Alto Medioevo
title_sort la recezione della topica boeziana nell'alto medioevo
description The purpose of this study is to focus on the coexistence, during the transmission of the doctrine on the Topics in the early Middle Ages, of two different interpretations: although both emerge from two commentaries on Cicero’s Topics, however, they gave rise to two different readings: the one transmitted by Marius Victorinus (ca. 280-365 AC) who thought the topics almost exclusively in the service of Rhetoric, the other conceived by Boethius (ca. 480-524 AC) who intended to restore the centrality that the Topics had in the Aristotelian Logic, by subordinating the rethorical Topics to dialectical Topics. My conclusion is that the Early Middle Ages can be considered, from an epistemological point of view, as a long boetiana aetas. Although the corpus of Boethius’s logical writings was not yet available until the second half of the 11th century, Boethius’s methodological approach on the Topics somehow continued to support the slow but constant absorption of the topical doctrine into the new Christian sensibility.
publisher Facultad de Filosofía y Letras, Universidad de Buenos Aires
publishDate 2021
url http://revistascientificas.filo.uba.ar/index.php/petm/article/view/10035
work_keys_str_mv AT magnanofiorella larecezionedellatopicaboeziananellaltomedioevo
AT magnanofiorella thereceptionofboethiantopicsintheearlymiddleages
first_indexed 2023-06-27T21:17:58Z
last_indexed 2023-11-08T21:49:24Z
_version_ 1782034112851214336

Ejemplares similares