Lightowler2.p65

As much as the pathological phenomena the exercise and training promote in the heart adaptation phenomena, which vary according to the mechanism that promotes them. One of the mechanisms that is always present in cardiac adaptation is hypertrophy of myocardium. The degree of hypertrophy can be evalu...

Descripción completa

Guardado en:

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales:	Lightowler, C., Casalonga, O., Di Tollo, B., Cattaneo, M.L.
Formato:	Artículo publishedVersion
Lenguaje:	Español
Publicado:	Universidad de Buenos Aires. Facultad de Ciencias Veterinarias. 2005
Materias:	ecocardiografía espesor parietal relativo canino echocardiography dog Relative Wall Thickness
Acceso en línea:	http://repositoriouba.sisbi.uba.ar/gsdl/cgi-bin/library.cgi?a=d&c=pveterinaria/invet&cl=CL1&d=HWA_4598 https://repositoriouba.sisbi.uba.ar/gsdl/collect/pveterinaria/invet/index/assoc/HWA_4598.dir/4598.PDF
Aporte de:	Repositorio Digital de la Universidad de Buenos Aires (UBA) de Universidad de Buenos Aires

id	I28-R145-HWA_4598
record_format	dspace
spelling	I28-R145-HWA_45982024-11-05 Lightowler2.p65 As much as the pathological phenomena the exercise and training promote in the heart adaptation phenomena, which vary according to the mechanism that promotes them. One of the mechanisms that is always present in cardiac adaptation is hypertrophy of myocardium. The degree of hypertrophy can be evaluated measuring the left ventricular myocardial mass. Nevertheless this parameter measures the amount of hypertrophy, but not how it is distributed; this can be evaluated by means of relative wall thickness (RWT) index. In the present study the authors describe the echocardiography technique for the evaluation of the RWT in the dog and present its normal mean value. The results obtained were the following: Mean: 0,482; Standard deviation: 0,098; Coefficient of variation: 18,37%; Minimum value: 0,355; First quartile: 0,407; Median: 0,459; Third quartile: 0,528; Maximum value: 0,728. Also was verified the nonexistence of linear regression between the RWT and the body weight. Fil: Lightowler, C. Universidad de Buenos Aires. Facultad de Ciencias Veterinarias. Enfermedades Quirúrgicas. Buenos Aires, Argentina Fil: Casalonga, O. Universidad de Buenos Aires. Facultad de Ciencias Veterinarias. Anatomía. Buenos Aires, Argentina Fil: Di Tollo, B. Universidad de Buenos Aires. Facultad de Ciencias Veterinarias. Clínica Médica y Quirúrgica de Pequeños Animales. Buenos Aires, Argentina Fil: Cattaneo, M.L. Universidad de Buenos Aires. Facultad de Ciencias Veterinarias. Bioestadística. Buenos Aires, Argentina Lightowler, C. Casalonga, O. Di Tollo, B. Cattaneo, M.L. 2005 Tanto los fenómenos patológicos como el ejercicio y entrenamiento promueven en el corazón fenómenos de adaptación, que varían según el mecanismo que los promueve. Uno de los mecanismos que se encuentra siempre en la adaptación cardiaca es la hipertrofia del miocardio. El grado de hipertrofia puede evaluarse midiendo la masa miocárdica ventricular izquierda. Sin embargo este parámetro evalúa la cantidad de hipertrofia, pero no la manera en que ésta se distribuye. Dicha distribución puede calcularse por medio del índice ecocardiográfico conocido como espesor parietal relativo (EPR). En este trabajo, los autores presentan la técnica ecocardiográfica para la evaluación del EPR en el perro y su valor normal promedio. Los resultados obtenidos fueron los siguientes: Media: 0,482; Desviación estándar: 0,098; Coeficiente de variación: 18,37%; Valor mínimo: 0,355; Primer cuartil: 0,407; Mediana: 0,459; Tercer cuartil: 0,528; Valor máximo: 0,728. Asimismo, se verificó la inexistencia de regresión lineal entre el EPR y el peso corporal. application/pdf 1514-6634 (impreso) 1668-3498 (en línea) ecocardiografía espesor parietal relativo canino echocardiography dog Relative Wall Thickness spa Universidad de Buenos Aires. Facultad de Ciencias Veterinarias. info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/2.5/ar/ InVet, vol. 07, nº1 Evaluación del espesor parietal relativo en la especie canina Evaluation of relative wall thickness in dogs info:eu-repo/semantics/article info:ar-repo/semantics/artículo info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion http://repositoriouba.sisbi.uba.ar/gsdl/cgi-bin/library.cgi?a=d&c=pveterinaria/invet&cl=CL1&d=HWA_4598 https://repositoriouba.sisbi.uba.ar/gsdl/collect/pveterinaria/invet/index/assoc/HWA_4598.dir/4598.PDF
institution	Universidad de Buenos Aires
institution_str	I-28
repository_str	R-145
collection	Repositorio Digital de la Universidad de Buenos Aires (UBA)
language	Español
orig_language_str_mv	spa
topic	ecocardiografía espesor parietal relativo canino echocardiography dog Relative Wall Thickness
spellingShingle	ecocardiografía espesor parietal relativo canino echocardiography dog Relative Wall Thickness Lightowler, C. Casalonga, O. Di Tollo, B. Cattaneo, M.L. Lightowler2.p65
topic_facet	ecocardiografía espesor parietal relativo canino echocardiography dog Relative Wall Thickness
description	As much as the pathological phenomena the exercise and training promote in the heart adaptation phenomena, which vary according to the mechanism that promotes them. One of the mechanisms that is always present in cardiac adaptation is hypertrophy of myocardium. The degree of hypertrophy can be evaluated measuring the left ventricular myocardial mass. Nevertheless this parameter measures the amount of hypertrophy, but not how it is distributed; this can be evaluated by means of relative wall thickness (RWT) index. In the present study the authors describe the echocardiography technique for the evaluation of the RWT in the dog and present its normal mean value. The results obtained were the following: Mean: 0,482; Standard deviation: 0,098; Coefficient of variation: 18,37%; Minimum value: 0,355; First quartile: 0,407; Median: 0,459; Third quartile: 0,528; Maximum value: 0,728. Also was verified the nonexistence of linear regression between the RWT and the body weight.
format	Artículo Artículo publishedVersion
author	Lightowler, C. Casalonga, O. Di Tollo, B. Cattaneo, M.L.
author_facet	Lightowler, C. Casalonga, O. Di Tollo, B. Cattaneo, M.L.
author_sort	Lightowler, C.
title	Lightowler2.p65
title_short	Lightowler2.p65
title_full	Lightowler2.p65
title_fullStr	Lightowler2.p65
title_full_unstemmed	Lightowler2.p65
title_sort	lightowler2.p65
publisher	Universidad de Buenos Aires. Facultad de Ciencias Veterinarias.
publishDate	2005
url	http://repositoriouba.sisbi.uba.ar/gsdl/cgi-bin/library.cgi?a=d&c=pveterinaria/invet&cl=CL1&d=HWA_4598 https://repositoriouba.sisbi.uba.ar/gsdl/collect/pveterinaria/invet/index/assoc/HWA_4598.dir/4598.PDF
work_keys_str_mv	AT lightowlerc lightowler2p65 AT casalongao lightowler2p65 AT ditollob lightowler2p65 AT cattaneoml lightowler2p65 AT lightowlerc evaluaciondelespesorparietalrelativoenlaespeciecanina AT casalongao evaluaciondelespesorparietalrelativoenlaespeciecanina AT ditollob evaluaciondelespesorparietalrelativoenlaespeciecanina AT cattaneoml evaluaciondelespesorparietalrelativoenlaespeciecanina AT lightowlerc evaluationofrelativewallthicknessindogs AT casalongao evaluationofrelativewallthicknessindogs AT ditollob evaluationofrelativewallthicknessindogs AT cattaneoml evaluationofrelativewallthicknessindogs
_version_	1824359764060012544

Lightowler2.p65

Ejemplares similares