InVet. 2015, 17 (2): 203-210 ISSN 1514-6634 (impreso) SEROLOGÍA DE...

Goat production is an important item in the agricultural system of Argentina and brucellosis caused by Brucella melitensis is considered the main cause reproductive problems in this species. Although definitive diagnosis for this disease is made by isolation of the etiologic agent, but in practice t...

Descripción completa

Guardado en:
Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Cisterna, C., Conde, S., Hollender, D., Martino, P.E., Samartino L.
Formato: Artículo publishedVersion
Lenguaje:Español
Publicado: Universidad de Buenos Aires. Facultad de Ciencias Veterinarias 2015
Materias:
Acceso en línea:http://repositoriouba.sisbi.uba.ar/gsdl/cgi-bin/library.cgi?a=d&c=pveterinaria/invet&cl=CL1&d=HWA_1305
https://repositoriouba.sisbi.uba.ar/gsdl/collect/pveterinaria/invet/index/assoc/HWA_1305.dir/1305.PDF
Aporte de:
id I28-R145-HWA_1305
record_format dspace
institution Universidad de Buenos Aires
institution_str I-28
repository_str R-145
collection Repositorio Digital de la Universidad de Buenos Aires (UBA)
language Español
orig_language_str_mv spa
topic Brucelosis
Diagnóstico
Caprinos
Brucellosis
Diagnosis
Goats
spellingShingle Brucelosis
Diagnóstico
Caprinos
Brucellosis
Diagnosis
Goats
Cisterna, C.
Conde, S.
Hollender, D.
Martino, P.E.
Samartino L.
InVet. 2015, 17 (2): 203-210 ISSN 1514-6634 (impreso) SEROLOGÍA DE...
topic_facet Brucelosis
Diagnóstico
Caprinos
Brucellosis
Diagnosis
Goats
description Goat production is an important item in the agricultural system of Argentina and brucellosis caused by Brucella melitensis is considered the main cause reproductive problems in this species. Although definitive diagnosis for this disease is made by isolation of the etiologic agent, but in practice the health status of a herd was evaluated by serological techniques indirect testing. To evaluate and compare the performance of different serological tests for diagnosis of brucellosis in goats, serum samples were analyzed. The following tests were performed: buffered plate antigen (BPA), rose bengal (RB RB 3% and 8%), fluorescence polarization (FPA) and the test tube and 2 mercaptoethanol (SAT/2ME). The validity of each test was determined in a relative manner by combination of indirect ELISA (IELISA) and complement fixation (CF). BPA was the most sensitive test, followed by SAT/2ME, 3% RB, FPA and, finally, RB 8%. FPA test, when used in series with BPA, significantly improved overall specificity. Based on these results it was proposed for brucellosis diagnosis in goats, BPA as a screening test, FPA as complementary test, and FC and IELISA as confirmatory tests. SAT/2ME is recommended only when it is not possible to perform other tests, due to the toxic effects of SAT/2ME reagents.
format Artículo
Artículo
publishedVersion
author Cisterna, C.
Conde, S.
Hollender, D.
Martino, P.E.
Samartino L.
author_facet Cisterna, C.
Conde, S.
Hollender, D.
Martino, P.E.
Samartino L.
author_sort Cisterna, C.
title InVet. 2015, 17 (2): 203-210 ISSN 1514-6634 (impreso) SEROLOGÍA DE...
title_short InVet. 2015, 17 (2): 203-210 ISSN 1514-6634 (impreso) SEROLOGÍA DE...
title_full InVet. 2015, 17 (2): 203-210 ISSN 1514-6634 (impreso) SEROLOGÍA DE...
title_fullStr InVet. 2015, 17 (2): 203-210 ISSN 1514-6634 (impreso) SEROLOGÍA DE...
title_full_unstemmed InVet. 2015, 17 (2): 203-210 ISSN 1514-6634 (impreso) SEROLOGÍA DE...
title_sort invet. 2015, 17 (2): 203-210 issn 1514-6634 (impreso) serología de...
publisher Universidad de Buenos Aires. Facultad de Ciencias Veterinarias
publishDate 2015
url http://repositoriouba.sisbi.uba.ar/gsdl/cgi-bin/library.cgi?a=d&c=pveterinaria/invet&cl=CL1&d=HWA_1305
https://repositoriouba.sisbi.uba.ar/gsdl/collect/pveterinaria/invet/index/assoc/HWA_1305.dir/1305.PDF
work_keys_str_mv AT cisternac invet2015172203210issn15146634impresoserologiade
AT condes invet2015172203210issn15146634impresoserologiade
AT hollenderd invet2015172203210issn15146634impresoserologiade
AT martinope invet2015172203210issn15146634impresoserologiade
AT samartinol invet2015172203210issn15146634impresoserologiade
AT cisternac diagnosticoserologicodebrucelosisencaprinoscomparaciondetecnicas
AT condes diagnosticoserologicodebrucelosisencaprinoscomparaciondetecnicas
AT hollenderd diagnosticoserologicodebrucelosisencaprinoscomparaciondetecnicas
AT martinope diagnosticoserologicodebrucelosisencaprinoscomparaciondetecnicas
AT samartinol diagnosticoserologicodebrucelosisencaprinoscomparaciondetecnicas
AT cisternac serologicaldiagnosisofbrucellosisingoatscomparisonoftechniques
AT condes serologicaldiagnosisofbrucellosisingoatscomparisonoftechniques
AT hollenderd serologicaldiagnosisofbrucellosisingoatscomparisonoftechniques
AT martinope serologicaldiagnosisofbrucellosisingoatscomparisonoftechniques
AT samartinol serologicaldiagnosisofbrucellosisingoatscomparisonoftechniques
_version_ 1824952393649881088
spelling I28-R145-HWA_13052024-12-20 InVet. 2015, 17 (2): 203-210 ISSN 1514-6634 (impreso) SEROLOGÍA DE... Goat production is an important item in the agricultural system of Argentina and brucellosis caused by Brucella melitensis is considered the main cause reproductive problems in this species. Although definitive diagnosis for this disease is made by isolation of the etiologic agent, but in practice the health status of a herd was evaluated by serological techniques indirect testing. To evaluate and compare the performance of different serological tests for diagnosis of brucellosis in goats, serum samples were analyzed. The following tests were performed: buffered plate antigen (BPA), rose bengal (RB RB 3% and 8%), fluorescence polarization (FPA) and the test tube and 2 mercaptoethanol (SAT/2ME). The validity of each test was determined in a relative manner by combination of indirect ELISA (IELISA) and complement fixation (CF). BPA was the most sensitive test, followed by SAT/2ME, 3% RB, FPA and, finally, RB 8%. FPA test, when used in series with BPA, significantly improved overall specificity. Based on these results it was proposed for brucellosis diagnosis in goats, BPA as a screening test, FPA as complementary test, and FC and IELISA as confirmatory tests. SAT/2ME is recommended only when it is not possible to perform other tests, due to the toxic effects of SAT/2ME reagents. Fil: Cisterna, C. Comisión de Investigaciones Científicas (CIC). Buenos Aires, Argentina Fil: Conde, S. Instituto Nacional de Tecnología Agropecuaria. Centro de Investigación en Ciencias Veterinarias y Agronómicas. Instituto de Patobiología. Buenos Aires, Argentina Fil: Hollender, D. CONICET. Argentina Fil: Martino, P.E. Comisión de Investigaciones Científicas (CIC). Buenos Aires, Argentina Fil: Samartino L. Instituto Nacional de Tecnología Agropecuaria. Centro de Investigación en Ciencias Veterinarias y Agronómicas. Instituto de Patobiología. Buenos Aires, Argentina Cisterna, C. Conde, S. Hollender, D. Martino, P.E. Samartino L. 2015 La producción caprina representa un rubro importante dentro del sistema agropecuario de la República Argentina y la brucelosis causada por Brucella melitensis es considerada el motivo principal de los problemas reproductivos en esta especie. El diagnóstico de certeza se realiza aislando el agente etiológico, aunque en la práctica se evalúa el estado sanitario de un hato mediante pruebas serológicas. El objetivo de este trabajo fue evaluar y comparar el desempeño de las distintas pruebas serológicas tamíz y complementarias para el diagnóstico de la brucelosis caprina. Para ello, se analizaron muestras de suero de animales sin vacunación, realizando antígeno buferado en placa (BPA), rosa de bengala (RB 3 % y RB 8 %), polarización fluorescente (FPA) y pruebas de tubo y 2 mercaptoetanol (SAT/2ME). La validez de cada prueba se determinó por combinación de ELISA Indirecto (IELISA) y Fijación de Complemento (FC). BPA resultó ser más sensible, seguido de SAT/2ME, RB 3%, FPA y por último RB 8%. Al realizar FPA en serie con BPA mejoró significativamente la especificidad global. Se propone BPA como prueba tamíz, FPA como complementaria y FC e IELISA como confirmatorias. Se recomienda SAT/2ME sólo en los casos en que no sea posible la realización de las otras pruebas debido a los efectos tóxicos de los reactivos empleados para su realización. application/pdf 1514-6634 (impreso) 1668-3498 (en línea) Brucelosis Diagnóstico Caprinos Brucellosis Diagnosis Goats spa Universidad de Buenos Aires. Facultad de Ciencias Veterinarias info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/2.5/ar/ InVet, vol. 17, nº 2 Diagnóstico serológico de brucelosis en caprinos: comparación de técnicas Serological diagnosis of brucellosis in goats: comparison of techniques info:eu-repo/semantics/article info:ar-repo/semantics/artículo info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion http://repositoriouba.sisbi.uba.ar/gsdl/cgi-bin/library.cgi?a=d&c=pveterinaria/invet&cl=CL1&d=HWA_1305 https://repositoriouba.sisbi.uba.ar/gsdl/collect/pveterinaria/invet/index/assoc/HWA_1305.dir/1305.PDF