Verstehen. De la ciencia a la cibernética
This writing is aimed at approaching social sciences? methodology\nin an analytical manner. It presents a demarcation criterion to determine what can be deemed as science and what cannot, as well as the idea that the so-called\nsocial sciences are not sciences as such and that it is a mistake to exp...
Guardado en:
| Autor principal: | |
|---|---|
| Formato: | Artículo publishedVersion |
| Lenguaje: | Español |
| Publicado: |
Universidad de Buenos Aires. Facultad de Derecho. Departamento de Publicaciones
2009
|
| Materias: | |
| Acceso en línea: | http://www.derecho.uba.ar/publicaciones/lye/revistas/87/lecciones-y-ensayos-87-paginas-185-209.pdf http://repositoriouba.sisbi.uba.ar/gsdl/cgi-bin/library.cgi?a=d&c=revis&cl=CL1&d=HWA_1105 http://repositoriouba.sisbi.uba.ar/gsdl/collect/pderecho/lecciones/index/assoc/HWA_1105.dir/1105.PDF |
| Aporte de: |
| id |
I28-R145-HWA_1105 |
|---|---|
| record_format |
dspace |
| spelling |
I28-R145-HWA_11052016-08-30 This writing is aimed at approaching social sciences? methodology\nin an analytical manner. It presents a demarcation criterion to determine what can be deemed as science and what cannot, as well as the idea that the so-called\nsocial sciences are not sciences as such and that it is a mistake to expect them to\nbe so. An answer to the queries of what Law is and of whether there is or not a\nlegal science can also be found.\nFurther, this work intends to prove that in social cybernetics it is impossible to\nexplain or predict human conduct, which can just be understood. In addition, it is\na mistake to expect objectivity in the study thereof, not because of the fact of the\nobject of study being human beings but because the human beings carrying out\nthe study are immersed in the object of study. It is also impossible to establish\ngeneral or universal rules to govern social behavior.\nThis work provides an invitation to think about, to question and to doubt all\nwhich we have been imposed with as rigid during our entire lives; to accept that\nit is possible for somebody making a statement to make mistakes, as well as we\nourselves may make mistakes; to learn from such mistakes and, mainly, from our\nown mistakes. This writing does not unveil universal truths, it just ends where it\nbegins, accepting the possibility of being wrong Fil: Garaventa, Carlos A. Universidad de Buenos Aires. Facultad de Derecho; Argentina Garaventa, Carlos A. 2009 Este trabajo pretende abordar críticamente la metodología de las\nciencias sociales. En él se puede vislumbrar un criterio de demarcación para determinar\nlo que es ciencia y lo que no lo es, así como la idea de que las llamadas\n?ciencias sociales? nos son ciencias propiamente dichas, y de que se incurre en\nun error cuando se pretende que lo sean. Puede encontrarse también una respuesta\na la pregunta ¿qué es el Derecho?, y si existe, o no, la ?ciencia jurídica?.\nSe propone demostrar aquí que en cibernética social es imposible explicar o\npredecir las conductas humanas, las cuales son meramente comprensibles, y que\nes un error pretender objetividad en el estudio de éstas, no porque su objeto de\nestudio sean sujetos, sino porque son sujetos insertos en su estudio los que lo llevan\na cabo. También es imposible formular normas generales o leyes universales\nque rijan el comportamiento social.\nÉsta es una invitación a pensar, a cuestionar y dudar de todo aquello que nos han\nimpuesto como pétreo toda nuestra vida. A admitir la posibilidad de que quien\nrealiza una afirmación puede equivocarse, como que nosotros mismos podemos\nequivocarnos; a aprender de las equivocaciones y, por sobre todo, de nuestros\npropios errores. Éste no es un texto de devele verdades universales, es un escrito\nque termina donde parte, aceptando la posibilidad de estar equivocado application/pdf 0024-0079 http://www.derecho.uba.ar/publicaciones/lye/revistas/87/lecciones-y-ensayos-87-paginas-185-209.pdf Ciencia Epistemología Comprensivismo metodológico Filosofía del Derecho Science Epistemology Methodological Interpretation Philosophy of the Law spa Universidad de Buenos Aires. Facultad de Derecho. Departamento de Publicaciones info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/2.5/ar/ Lecciones y Ensayos, no. 87 Verstehen. De la ciencia a la cibernética info:eu-repo/semantics/article info:ar-repo/semantics/artículo info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion http://repositoriouba.sisbi.uba.ar/gsdl/cgi-bin/library.cgi?a=d&c=revis&cl=CL1&d=HWA_1105 http://repositoriouba.sisbi.uba.ar/gsdl/collect/pderecho/lecciones/index/assoc/HWA_1105.dir/1105.PDF |
| institution |
Universidad de Buenos Aires |
| institution_str |
I-28 |
| repository_str |
R-145 |
| collection |
Repositorio Digital de la Universidad de Buenos Aires (UBA) |
| language |
Español |
| orig_language_str_mv |
spa |
| topic |
Ciencia Epistemología Comprensivismo metodológico Filosofía del Derecho Science Epistemology Methodological Interpretation Philosophy of the Law |
| spellingShingle |
Ciencia Epistemología Comprensivismo metodológico Filosofía del Derecho Science Epistemology Methodological Interpretation Philosophy of the Law Garaventa, Carlos A. Verstehen. De la ciencia a la cibernética |
| topic_facet |
Ciencia Epistemología Comprensivismo metodológico Filosofía del Derecho Science Epistemology Methodological Interpretation Philosophy of the Law |
| description |
This writing is aimed at approaching social sciences? methodology\nin an analytical manner. It presents a demarcation criterion to determine what can be deemed as science and what cannot, as well as the idea that the so-called\nsocial sciences are not sciences as such and that it is a mistake to expect them to\nbe so. An answer to the queries of what Law is and of whether there is or not a\nlegal science can also be found.\nFurther, this work intends to prove that in social cybernetics it is impossible to\nexplain or predict human conduct, which can just be understood. In addition, it is\na mistake to expect objectivity in the study thereof, not because of the fact of the\nobject of study being human beings but because the human beings carrying out\nthe study are immersed in the object of study. It is also impossible to establish\ngeneral or universal rules to govern social behavior.\nThis work provides an invitation to think about, to question and to doubt all\nwhich we have been imposed with as rigid during our entire lives; to accept that\nit is possible for somebody making a statement to make mistakes, as well as we\nourselves may make mistakes; to learn from such mistakes and, mainly, from our\nown mistakes. This writing does not unveil universal truths, it just ends where it\nbegins, accepting the possibility of being wrong |
| format |
Artículo Artículo publishedVersion |
| author |
Garaventa, Carlos A. |
| author_facet |
Garaventa, Carlos A. |
| author_sort |
Garaventa, Carlos A. |
| title |
Verstehen. De la ciencia a la cibernética |
| title_short |
Verstehen. De la ciencia a la cibernética |
| title_full |
Verstehen. De la ciencia a la cibernética |
| title_fullStr |
Verstehen. De la ciencia a la cibernética |
| title_full_unstemmed |
Verstehen. De la ciencia a la cibernética |
| title_sort |
verstehen. de la ciencia a la cibernética |
| publisher |
Universidad de Buenos Aires. Facultad de Derecho. Departamento de Publicaciones |
| publishDate |
2009 |
| url |
http://www.derecho.uba.ar/publicaciones/lye/revistas/87/lecciones-y-ensayos-87-paginas-185-209.pdf http://repositoriouba.sisbi.uba.ar/gsdl/cgi-bin/library.cgi?a=d&c=revis&cl=CL1&d=HWA_1105 http://repositoriouba.sisbi.uba.ar/gsdl/collect/pderecho/lecciones/index/assoc/HWA_1105.dir/1105.PDF |
| work_keys_str_mv |
AT garaventacarlosa verstehendelacienciaalacibernetica |
| _version_ |
1766022471910162432 |