El recurso : de mecanismo de control a garantía
In this work, we will discuss how the appeal, deemed so far to be a\ncontrol mechanism, adopted a rights-safeguard approach. Further, the history of\nthe trial system as background for the creation of the appeal, the main phylosophical and political ideas in each period, and the various meanings of...
Guardado en:
| Autor principal: | |
|---|---|
| Formato: | Artículo publishedVersion |
| Lenguaje: | Español |
| Publicado: |
Universidad de Buenos Aires. Facultad de Derecho. Departamento de Publicaciones
2009
|
| Materias: | |
| Acceso en línea: | http://www.derecho.uba.ar/publicaciones/lye/revistas/87/lecciones-y-ensayos-87-paginas-163-183.pdf http://repositoriouba.sisbi.uba.ar/gsdl/cgi-bin/library.cgi?a=d&c=revis&cl=CL1&d=HWA_1104 http://repositoriouba.sisbi.uba.ar/gsdl/collect/pderecho/lecciones/index/assoc/HWA_1104.dir/1104.PDF |
| Aporte de: |
| id |
I28-R145-HWA_1104 |
|---|---|
| record_format |
dspace |
| spelling |
I28-R145-HWA_11042016-08-30 In this work, we will discuss how the appeal, deemed so far to be a\ncontrol mechanism, adopted a rights-safeguard approach. Further, the history of\nthe trial system as background for the creation of the appeal, the main phylosophical and political ideas in each period, and the various meanings of appeal will\nbe examined.\nIn order to undergo a non-conventional analysis, thus avoiding affimations of an\nevolutional type as regards the change in the idea or concept, we will use terms\ncoined by FOUCAULT. Emphasis will not be laid on the legal aspect of power,\nconstrued as repression, but on its positive aspect, concerning the knowledge\ndeveloped through it, including legal tools, such as appeals.\nIn this essay, the subsistence of an appeals mechanism is considered to be grounded\non the fact that such practice, beyond discourse changes introduced in order\nto justify it, was useful to achieve certain goals during emergency periods.\nCertain aspects of this tool allowed a rights-safeguard approach, aimed at remediating\narbitrary or unlawful adverse court decisions affecting the accused or\ncondemned\n Fil: Piechenstein, Ana Clara. Universidad de Buenos Aires. Facultad de Derecho; Argentina Piechenstein, Ana Clara 2009 El trabajo trata el pasaje del mecanismo recursivo como herramienta\nde control a su actual concepción garantista. Se aborda la historia de los sistemas\nde enjuiciamiento como contexto de surgimiento del recurso, las ideas políticofilosóficas\npredominantes en cada período y la aparición de una multiplicidad de\nsignificados del concepto de recurso.\nSe aplican conceptos provenientes de la obra de Foucault para trazar líneas de\nanálisis no convencionales, que eviten caer en afirmaciones de tipo ?evolutivo?\nen relación al cambio en la idea o el concepto. No se pondrá énfasis en la matriz\njurídica del poder, entendido como represión, sino más bien en su faz positiva,\ncomo productor de formas de saber, entre las que se incluirá a las formas jurídicas,\nen particular, a la práctica recursiva.\nEl ensayo sugiere que el mecanismo recursivo debe su permanencia a que tal\npráctica, más allá de las modificaciones discursivas que tuvieron lugar para fundamentarla,\nera útil a ciertos fines en el momento de su emergencia. Los intersticios\nque esta herramienta dejaba entrever permitieron su uso garantista, para\nremediar resoluciones judiciales adversas al imputado o condenado emitidas\narbitrariamente o en contra del derecho application/pdf 0024-0079 http://www.derecho.uba.ar/publicaciones/lye/revistas/87/lecciones-y-ensayos-87-paginas-163-183.pdf Recurso contra la sentencia penal Sistemas de enjuiciamiento penal Mecanismo de control Poder Garantías Appeals against criminal courts? decisions Criminal trial systems Control mechanism Power Rights Safeguard spa Universidad de Buenos Aires. Facultad de Derecho. Departamento de Publicaciones info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/2.5/ar/ Lecciones y Ensayos, no. 87 El recurso : de mecanismo de control a garantía info:eu-repo/semantics/article info:ar-repo/semantics/artículo info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion http://repositoriouba.sisbi.uba.ar/gsdl/cgi-bin/library.cgi?a=d&c=revis&cl=CL1&d=HWA_1104 http://repositoriouba.sisbi.uba.ar/gsdl/collect/pderecho/lecciones/index/assoc/HWA_1104.dir/1104.PDF |
| institution |
Universidad de Buenos Aires |
| institution_str |
I-28 |
| repository_str |
R-145 |
| collection |
Repositorio Digital de la Universidad de Buenos Aires (UBA) |
| language |
Español |
| orig_language_str_mv |
spa |
| topic |
Recurso contra la sentencia penal Sistemas de enjuiciamiento penal Mecanismo de control Poder Garantías Appeals against criminal courts? decisions Criminal trial systems Control mechanism Power Rights Safeguard |
| spellingShingle |
Recurso contra la sentencia penal Sistemas de enjuiciamiento penal Mecanismo de control Poder Garantías Appeals against criminal courts? decisions Criminal trial systems Control mechanism Power Rights Safeguard Piechenstein, Ana Clara El recurso : de mecanismo de control a garantía |
| topic_facet |
Recurso contra la sentencia penal Sistemas de enjuiciamiento penal Mecanismo de control Poder Garantías Appeals against criminal courts? decisions Criminal trial systems Control mechanism Power Rights Safeguard |
| description |
In this work, we will discuss how the appeal, deemed so far to be a\ncontrol mechanism, adopted a rights-safeguard approach. Further, the history of\nthe trial system as background for the creation of the appeal, the main phylosophical and political ideas in each period, and the various meanings of appeal will\nbe examined.\nIn order to undergo a non-conventional analysis, thus avoiding affimations of an\nevolutional type as regards the change in the idea or concept, we will use terms\ncoined by FOUCAULT. Emphasis will not be laid on the legal aspect of power,\nconstrued as repression, but on its positive aspect, concerning the knowledge\ndeveloped through it, including legal tools, such as appeals.\nIn this essay, the subsistence of an appeals mechanism is considered to be grounded\non the fact that such practice, beyond discourse changes introduced in order\nto justify it, was useful to achieve certain goals during emergency periods.\nCertain aspects of this tool allowed a rights-safeguard approach, aimed at remediating\narbitrary or unlawful adverse court decisions affecting the accused or\ncondemned\n |
| format |
Artículo Artículo publishedVersion |
| author |
Piechenstein, Ana Clara |
| author_facet |
Piechenstein, Ana Clara |
| author_sort |
Piechenstein, Ana Clara |
| title |
El recurso : de mecanismo de control a garantía |
| title_short |
El recurso : de mecanismo de control a garantía |
| title_full |
El recurso : de mecanismo de control a garantía |
| title_fullStr |
El recurso : de mecanismo de control a garantía |
| title_full_unstemmed |
El recurso : de mecanismo de control a garantía |
| title_sort |
el recurso : de mecanismo de control a garantía |
| publisher |
Universidad de Buenos Aires. Facultad de Derecho. Departamento de Publicaciones |
| publishDate |
2009 |
| url |
http://www.derecho.uba.ar/publicaciones/lye/revistas/87/lecciones-y-ensayos-87-paginas-163-183.pdf http://repositoriouba.sisbi.uba.ar/gsdl/cgi-bin/library.cgi?a=d&c=revis&cl=CL1&d=HWA_1104 http://repositoriouba.sisbi.uba.ar/gsdl/collect/pderecho/lecciones/index/assoc/HWA_1104.dir/1104.PDF |
| work_keys_str_mv |
AT piechensteinanaclara elrecursodemecanismodecontrolagarantia |
| _version_ |
1766022471721418752 |