Diagram of a device. Prohibition of drugs and processes of subjectivation

The prohibition of drugs is considered in terms of the notion of device elaborated by Foucault: a network inscribed in a power play that articulates the orientation of behaviors through a series of discourses, institutions, laws and other instances. Insofar as it is internalized in the form of belie...

Descripción completa

Guardado en:
Detalles Bibliográficos
Autor principal: Lynch, Fernando M.
Formato: Artículo publishedVersion Artículos evaluados por pares
Lenguaje:Español
Publicado: Instituto de Ciencias Antropológicas, Facultad de Filosofía y Letras, UBA 2018
Materias:
Acceso en línea:http://revistascientificas.filo.uba.ar/index.php/runa/article/view/5135
http://repositoriouba.sisbi.uba.ar/gsdl/cgi-bin/library.cgi?a=d&c=runa&d=5135_oai
Aporte de:
id I28-R145-5135_oai
record_format dspace
spelling I28-R145-5135_oai2021-07-29 Lynch, Fernando M. 2018-12-28 The prohibition of drugs is considered in terms of the notion of device elaborated by Foucault: a network inscribed in a power play that articulates the orientation of behaviors through a series of discourses, institutions, laws and other instances. Insofar as it is internalized in the form of beliefs and feelings, the device is constitutive of subjectivity. The prohibitionist device is analyzed through four social dimensions: the religious and the political refer to the respective moral and ethnic substrates that underlie it; the medical and legal refer to the disciplinary complicity that has sanctioned the double condition of disease and criminality. The political-juridical ambivalence inherent to the prohibition is own of the ‘state of exception’ as it has been elaborated by Agamben, based on whose contrasts between potestas and auctoritas is formulated a synthesis of the processes of subjectivation implied in this device. Se considera la prohibición de las drogas en términos de la noción de dispositivo elaborada por Foucault: una red inscrita en un juego de poder que articula la orientación de las conductas por medio de una serie de discursos, instituciones, leyes y otras instancias. En tanto se interioriza bajo la forma de creencias y sentimientos, el dispositivo resulta constitutivo de la subjetividad. Se analiza el dispositivo prohibicionista a través de cuatro dimensiones sociales: la religiosa y la política remiten a los respectivos sustratos moral y étnico que lo fundamentan; la médica y la jurídica refieren a la complicidad disciplinaria que ha sancionado la doble condición de enfermedad y criminalidad. La ambivalencia político-jurídica inherente a la prohibición es propia del ‘estado de excepción’ según ha sido elaborado por Agamben, con base en cuya contraposición entre potestas y auctoritas se formula una síntesis de los procesos de subjetivación implicados en este dispositivo. A proibição das drogas é considerado em termos da noção de dispositivo desenvolvido por Foucault: uma rede social num jogo de poder que articula a orientação de comportamento através de uma série de discursos, instituições, leis e outros organismos. Na medida em que é internalizado na forma de crenças e sentimentos, o dispositivo é constitutivo da subjetividade. O dispositivo proibicionista é analisado através de quatro dimensões sociais: a religiosa e a política referem-se aos respectivos substratos morais e étnicos subjacentes; os médicos e legais referem-se à cumplicidade disciplinar que sancionou a dupla condição de doença e criminalidade. A ambivalência político-jurídica inerente à proibição é em si o “estado de exceção” tal como foi elaborado por Agamben, a partir de cuja contraposição entre potestas e auctoritas se formula uma síntese dos processos de subjetivação implícita neste dispositivo. application/pdf http://revistascientificas.filo.uba.ar/index.php/runa/article/view/5135 10.34096/runa.v39i2.5135 spa Instituto de Ciencias Antropológicas, Facultad de Filosofía y Letras, UBA http://revistascientificas.filo.uba.ar/index.php/runa/article/view/5135/4962 RUNA, archivo para las ciencias del hombre; Vol. 39 Núm. 2 (2018) RUNA, archivo para las ciencias del hombre; Vol 39 No 2 (2018) RUNA, archivo para las ciencias del hombre; v. 39 n. 2 (2018) 1851-9628 0325-1217 Device Prohibition Drugs Subjectivity Ethics Dispositivo Prohibición Drogas Subjetividad Ética Dispositivo Proibição Drogas Subjetividade Éticol Diagram of a device. Prohibition of drugs and processes of subjectivation Diagrama de un dispositivo. Prohibición de drogas y constitución de subjetividad Diagrama de um dispositivo. Proibição de drogas e processos de subjetivação info:eu-repo/semantics/article info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion Artículos evaluados por pares http://repositoriouba.sisbi.uba.ar/gsdl/cgi-bin/library.cgi?a=d&c=runa&d=5135_oai
institution Universidad de Buenos Aires
institution_str I-28
repository_str R-145
collection Repositorio Digital de la Universidad de Buenos Aires (UBA)
language Español
orig_language_str_mv spa
topic Device
Prohibition
Drugs
Subjectivity
Ethics
Dispositivo
Prohibición
Drogas
Subjetividad
Ética
Dispositivo
Proibição
Drogas
Subjetividade
Éticol
spellingShingle Device
Prohibition
Drugs
Subjectivity
Ethics
Dispositivo
Prohibición
Drogas
Subjetividad
Ética
Dispositivo
Proibição
Drogas
Subjetividade
Éticol
Lynch, Fernando M.
Diagram of a device. Prohibition of drugs and processes of subjectivation
topic_facet Device
Prohibition
Drugs
Subjectivity
Ethics
Dispositivo
Prohibición
Drogas
Subjetividad
Ética
Dispositivo
Proibição
Drogas
Subjetividade
Éticol
description The prohibition of drugs is considered in terms of the notion of device elaborated by Foucault: a network inscribed in a power play that articulates the orientation of behaviors through a series of discourses, institutions, laws and other instances. Insofar as it is internalized in the form of beliefs and feelings, the device is constitutive of subjectivity. The prohibitionist device is analyzed through four social dimensions: the religious and the political refer to the respective moral and ethnic substrates that underlie it; the medical and legal refer to the disciplinary complicity that has sanctioned the double condition of disease and criminality. The political-juridical ambivalence inherent to the prohibition is own of the ‘state of exception’ as it has been elaborated by Agamben, based on whose contrasts between potestas and auctoritas is formulated a synthesis of the processes of subjectivation implied in this device.
format Artículo
publishedVersion
Artículos evaluados por pares
author Lynch, Fernando M.
author_facet Lynch, Fernando M.
author_sort Lynch, Fernando M.
title Diagram of a device. Prohibition of drugs and processes of subjectivation
title_short Diagram of a device. Prohibition of drugs and processes of subjectivation
title_full Diagram of a device. Prohibition of drugs and processes of subjectivation
title_fullStr Diagram of a device. Prohibition of drugs and processes of subjectivation
title_full_unstemmed Diagram of a device. Prohibition of drugs and processes of subjectivation
title_sort diagram of a device. prohibition of drugs and processes of subjectivation
publisher Instituto de Ciencias Antropológicas, Facultad de Filosofía y Letras, UBA
publishDate 2018
url http://revistascientificas.filo.uba.ar/index.php/runa/article/view/5135
http://repositoriouba.sisbi.uba.ar/gsdl/cgi-bin/library.cgi?a=d&c=runa&d=5135_oai
work_keys_str_mv AT lynchfernandom diagramofadeviceprohibitionofdrugsandprocessesofsubjectivation
AT lynchfernandom diagramadeundispositivoprohibiciondedrogasyconstituciondesubjetividad
AT lynchfernandom diagramadeumdispositivoproibicaodedrogaseprocessosdesubjetivacao
_version_ 1766024115019317248