History and Social Sciencies: readings of a French debate around 1900
The article presente the famous debate of 1903 between Françoise Simiand, Emile Durkheim's disciple, and the most prestigious French historians of the late XIX century, such as Paul Lacombe, Charles Seignobos, Charles Victor Langlois. Simiand questions the History of events and great characters...
Guardado en:
Autor principal: | |
---|---|
Formato: | Artículo publishedVersion |
Lenguaje: | Español |
Publicado: |
Sección Etnohistoria, Instituto de Ciencias Antropológicas. FFyL, UBA
2000
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | http://revistascientificas.filo.uba.ar/index.php/MA/article/view/13365 http://repositoriouba.sisbi.uba.ar/gsdl/cgi-bin/library.cgi?a=d&c=MA&d=13365_oai |
Aporte de: |
id |
I28-R145-13365_oai |
---|---|
record_format |
dspace |
spelling |
I28-R145-13365_oai2024-03-05 Revel , Jacques 2000-12-01 The article presente the famous debate of 1903 between Françoise Simiand, Emile Durkheim's disciple, and the most prestigious French historians of the late XIX century, such as Paul Lacombe, Charles Seignobos, Charles Victor Langlois. Simiand questions the History of events and great characters prevailing until that moment, suggesting the only method possible is the one of Social Sciences, based on statistics and capable of producing abstractions of a scientific type, The debate between History and Social Sciences is renewed in the 1960' by the Annales School and the influential stucturalism movement of those years. El trabajo presenta el célebre debate de 1903 entre Françoise Simiand, discípulo de Emile Durkheim, y los historiadores más prestigiosos de fines del siglo XIX, tales como Paul Lacombe, Charles Seignobos, Charles Victor Langlois. Simiand cuestiona la Historia del acontecimiento y de los grandes personajes ue prevalecía hasta el momento y sugiere que el único método posible es el de las Ciencias Sociales, basado en estadísticas y capaz de producir abstracciones de tipo científico. El debate entre Historia y Ciencias Sociales se renueva en la década de 1960 entre la "escuela" de los Annales y el influyente estructuralismo de esos años. application/pdf http://revistascientificas.filo.uba.ar/index.php/MA/article/view/13365 spa Sección Etnohistoria, Instituto de Ciencias Antropológicas. FFyL, UBA http://revistascientificas.filo.uba.ar/index.php/MA/article/view/13365/11800 Derechos de autor 2000 Memoria Americana. Cuadernos de Etnohistoria Memoria Americana. Cuadernos de Etnohistoria; Vol 9 (2000); 13-35 Memoria Americana. Cuadernos de Etnohistoria; Vol. 9 (2000); 13-35 1851-3751 0327-5752 history social sciences famous french debate around 1900 historia ciencias sociales debate francés famoso circa 1900 History and Social Sciencies: readings of a French debate around 1900 Historia y Ciencias Sociales: lecturas de un debate francés alrededor de 1900 info:eu-repo/semantics/article info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion http://repositoriouba.sisbi.uba.ar/gsdl/cgi-bin/library.cgi?a=d&c=MA&d=13365_oai |
institution |
Universidad de Buenos Aires |
institution_str |
I-28 |
repository_str |
R-145 |
collection |
Repositorio Digital de la Universidad de Buenos Aires (UBA) |
language |
Español |
orig_language_str_mv |
spa |
topic |
history social sciences famous french debate around 1900 historia ciencias sociales debate francés famoso circa 1900 |
spellingShingle |
history social sciences famous french debate around 1900 historia ciencias sociales debate francés famoso circa 1900 Revel , Jacques History and Social Sciencies: readings of a French debate around 1900 |
topic_facet |
history social sciences famous french debate around 1900 historia ciencias sociales debate francés famoso circa 1900 |
description |
The article presente the famous debate of 1903 between Françoise Simiand, Emile Durkheim's disciple, and the most prestigious French historians of the late XIX century, such as Paul Lacombe, Charles Seignobos, Charles Victor Langlois. Simiand questions the History of events and great characters prevailing until that moment, suggesting the only method possible is the one of Social Sciences, based on statistics and capable of producing abstractions of a scientific type, The debate between History and Social Sciences is renewed in the 1960' by the Annales School and the influential stucturalism movement of those years. |
format |
Artículo publishedVersion |
author |
Revel , Jacques |
author_facet |
Revel , Jacques |
author_sort |
Revel , Jacques |
title |
History and Social Sciencies: readings of a French debate around 1900 |
title_short |
History and Social Sciencies: readings of a French debate around 1900 |
title_full |
History and Social Sciencies: readings of a French debate around 1900 |
title_fullStr |
History and Social Sciencies: readings of a French debate around 1900 |
title_full_unstemmed |
History and Social Sciencies: readings of a French debate around 1900 |
title_sort |
history and social sciencies: readings of a french debate around 1900 |
publisher |
Sección Etnohistoria, Instituto de Ciencias Antropológicas. FFyL, UBA |
publishDate |
2000 |
url |
http://revistascientificas.filo.uba.ar/index.php/MA/article/view/13365 http://repositoriouba.sisbi.uba.ar/gsdl/cgi-bin/library.cgi?a=d&c=MA&d=13365_oai |
work_keys_str_mv |
AT reveljacques historyandsocialscienciesreadingsofafrenchdebatearound1900 AT reveljacques historiaycienciassocialeslecturasdeundebatefrancesalrededorde1900 |
_version_ |
1807327886212857856 |