Judicial cases as tools to investigate the role of the Federal Justice in Tucumán and its complicity with the repressive actions of the Armed Forces (1975-1983)
In the last quarter of the twentieth century, a series of military dictatorships were established in the countries of the Southern Cone of Latin America, which implemented State Terrorism as a tool to discipline and control the population. Once democracy had been restored, in some countries, the fam...
Guardado en:
Autor principal: | |
---|---|
Formato: | Artículo revista |
Lenguaje: | Español |
Publicado: |
Universidad Nacional del Litoral
2022
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://bibliotecavirtual.unl.edu.ar/publicaciones/index.php/Contenciosa/article/view/11616 |
Aporte de: |
id |
I26-R133-article-11616 |
---|---|
record_format |
ojs |
institution |
Universidad Nacional del Litoral |
institution_str |
I-26 |
repository_str |
R-133 |
container_title_str |
Biblioteca Virtual - Publicaciones (UNL) |
language |
Español |
format |
Artículo revista |
topic |
Justicia Federal terrorismo de Estado represión Complicidad Civil Justicia Justicia Federal Federal Justice State Terrorism Repression Civil Complicity Justice |
spellingShingle |
Justicia Federal terrorismo de Estado represión Complicidad Civil Justicia Justicia Federal Federal Justice State Terrorism Repression Civil Complicity Justice Bolsi, Francisco Judicial cases as tools to investigate the role of the Federal Justice in Tucumán and its complicity with the repressive actions of the Armed Forces (1975-1983) |
topic_facet |
Justicia Federal terrorismo de Estado represión Complicidad Civil Justicia Justicia Federal Federal Justice State Terrorism Repression Civil Complicity Justice |
author |
Bolsi, Francisco |
author_facet |
Bolsi, Francisco |
author_sort |
Bolsi, Francisco |
title |
Judicial cases as tools to investigate the role of the Federal Justice in Tucumán and its complicity with the repressive actions of the Armed Forces (1975-1983) |
title_short |
Judicial cases as tools to investigate the role of the Federal Justice in Tucumán and its complicity with the repressive actions of the Armed Forces (1975-1983) |
title_full |
Judicial cases as tools to investigate the role of the Federal Justice in Tucumán and its complicity with the repressive actions of the Armed Forces (1975-1983) |
title_fullStr |
Judicial cases as tools to investigate the role of the Federal Justice in Tucumán and its complicity with the repressive actions of the Armed Forces (1975-1983) |
title_full_unstemmed |
Judicial cases as tools to investigate the role of the Federal Justice in Tucumán and its complicity with the repressive actions of the Armed Forces (1975-1983) |
title_sort |
judicial cases as tools to investigate the role of the federal justice in tucumán and its complicity with the repressive actions of the armed forces (1975-1983) |
description |
In the last quarter of the twentieth century, a series of military dictatorships were established in the countries of the Southern Cone of Latin America, which implemented State Terrorism as a tool to discipline and control the population. Once democracy had been restored, in some countries, the families of the disappeared organized themselves in order to demand justice for the victims. From this process, the Justice was not exempt, which had to go through transformations to adapt to the new context linked to the incorporation of Human Rights into international law and its adaptation to the national jurisprudence of each country, which is why not only the military but also the civilian accomplices –judges, were tried, businessmen, priests– who accompanied or concealed information referring to the repressive process. For this reason, the purpose of this work is to analyze the role of federal justice in Tucumán between 1975 and 1983 from the study of various cases linked to political militants, the ways in which their causes were caratulated, the violation of their constitutional rights, their incorporation into the clandestine detention circuits and complicity with the repressive apparatus. To this end, three judicial cases will be taken as the axis of analysis, Romero Niklison and his complaints; Manlio Torcuato Martínez and his denunciation and the Megacausa Operativo Independencia, from which the role of justice in the selected period will be the role of justice in the selected period. |
publisher |
Universidad Nacional del Litoral |
publishDate |
2022 |
url |
https://bibliotecavirtual.unl.edu.ar/publicaciones/index.php/Contenciosa/article/view/11616 |
work_keys_str_mv |
AT bolsifrancisco judicialcasesastoolstoinvestigatetheroleofthefederaljusticeintucumananditscomplicitywiththerepressiveactionsofthearmedforces19751983 AT bolsifrancisco lascausasjudicialescomoherramientasparaindagarelroldelajusticiafederalentucumanysucomplicidadconelaccionarrepresivodelasfuerzasarmadas19751983 |
first_indexed |
2023-03-18T23:06:12Z |
last_indexed |
2023-03-18T23:06:12Z |
_version_ |
1770624548003119104 |
spelling |
I26-R133-article-116162022-11-10T13:48:04Z Judicial cases as tools to investigate the role of the Federal Justice in Tucumán and its complicity with the repressive actions of the Armed Forces (1975-1983) Las causas judiciales como herramientas para indagar el rol de la Justicia Federal en Tucumán y su complicidad con el accionar represivo de las Fuerzas Armadas (1975-1983) Bolsi, Francisco Justicia Federal terrorismo de Estado represión Complicidad Civil Justicia Justicia Federal Federal Justice State Terrorism Repression Civil Complicity Justice In the last quarter of the twentieth century, a series of military dictatorships were established in the countries of the Southern Cone of Latin America, which implemented State Terrorism as a tool to discipline and control the population. Once democracy had been restored, in some countries, the families of the disappeared organized themselves in order to demand justice for the victims. From this process, the Justice was not exempt, which had to go through transformations to adapt to the new context linked to the incorporation of Human Rights into international law and its adaptation to the national jurisprudence of each country, which is why not only the military but also the civilian accomplices –judges, were tried, businessmen, priests– who accompanied or concealed information referring to the repressive process. For this reason, the purpose of this work is to analyze the role of federal justice in Tucumán between 1975 and 1983 from the study of various cases linked to political militants, the ways in which their causes were caratulated, the violation of their constitutional rights, their incorporation into the clandestine detention circuits and complicity with the repressive apparatus. To this end, three judicial cases will be taken as the axis of analysis, Romero Niklison and his complaints; Manlio Torcuato Martínez and his denunciation and the Megacausa Operativo Independencia, from which the role of justice in the selected period will be the role of justice in the selected period. En el último cuarto del siglo XX, se instauraron una serie de dictaduras militares en los países de Cono Sur de América Latina, que implementaron el Terrorismo de Estado, como herramienta para disciplinar y controlar a la población. Recuperada la democracia, en algunos países, los familiares de los desaparecidos se organizaron a fin de pedir justicia por las víctimas. De este proceso, no estuvo exenta la Justicia que tuvo que atravesar transformaciones para adecuarse al nuevo contexto vinculado a la incorporación de los Derechos Humanos en la legislación internacional y su adaptación a la jurisprudencia nacional de cada país, motivo por el cual no solo fueron juzgados los militares sino también los cómplices civiles –jueces, empresarios, sacerdotes– que acompañaron u ocultaron información referida al proceso represivo. Por este motivo, el propósito de este trabajo es analizar el rol de la Justicia Federal en Tucumán entre 1975 y 1983 a partir del estudio de diversos casos vinculados con militantes políticos, las formas en que fueron caratuladas sus causas, la violación de sus derechos constitucionales, su incorporación a los circuitos clandestinos de detención y la complicidad con el aparato represivo. Para ello, se tomará como eje de análisis tres causas judiciales, Romero Niklison y sus denuncias; Manlio Torcuato Martínez y su denuncia y la Megacausa Operativo Independencia, a partir de las cuales se reconstruirá el rol de la justicia en el período seleccionado. Universidad Nacional del Litoral 2022-11-08 info:eu-repo/semantics/article info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion Art´ículo evaluado por pares application/pdf application/zip https://bibliotecavirtual.unl.edu.ar/publicaciones/index.php/Contenciosa/article/view/11616 10.14409/rc.10.12.e0023 Contenciosa; Núm. 12 (10): Contenciosa; e0023 Contenciosa; No. 12 (10): Contenciosa; e0023 2347-0011 10.14409/rc.10.12 spa https://bibliotecavirtual.unl.edu.ar/publicaciones/index.php/Contenciosa/article/view/11616/16610 https://bibliotecavirtual.unl.edu.ar/publicaciones/index.php/Contenciosa/article/view/11616/16612 Derechos de autor 2022 Contenciosa |