From non-Divine Omnipotence. : Meillassoux’s Rational Claim to Overcome Fideism
Quentin Meillassoux defends a position called “Speculative Materialism”, which claims to have reached –through a strictly rational procedure– something absolute. With this gesture, it asserts to go beyond Kantian criticism and fideism. This position is very different from traditional materialisms, b...
Guardado en:
Autor principal: | |
---|---|
Formato: | Artículo revista |
Lenguaje: | Español |
Publicado: |
ARFIL y UNL
2023
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://bibliotecavirtual.unl.edu.ar/publicaciones/index.php/Topicos/article/view/10654 |
Aporte de: |
id |
I26-R133-article-10654 |
---|---|
record_format |
ojs |
spelling |
I26-R133-article-106542023-12-15T12:21:22Z From non-Divine Omnipotence. : Meillassoux’s Rational Claim to Overcome Fideism De la omnipotencia no-divina: La pretensión racionalista de Meillassoux de superar el fideismo Galán Vélez, Francisco Vicente Meillassoux Reason Contingency Fideism Absolute Contemporary Philosophy Speculative Realism Meillasoux Razón Contingencia Fideísmo Absoluto Filofoía contemporánea Realismo especulativo Quentin Meillassoux defends a position called “Speculative Materialism”, which claims to have reached –through a strictly rational procedure– something absolute. With this gesture, it asserts to go beyond Kantian criticism and fideism. This position is very different from traditional materialisms, but also from all kinds of metaphysical absolute, insofar as it denies the validity of the principle of sufficient reason and rejects the existence of a necessary entity. The only necessary thing, for Meillassoux, is the principle which states that everything is contingent, and the concomitant nonreason of every existing being. The author objects that it is possible to uphold on rational grounds that reality lacks intelligibility, and at the same time argues that it is possible to sustain the thesis of an ex nihilo emergence of life, thought, and even divinity, with the argument that the radical contingence of everything implies that everything is possible, except the contradictory . Quentin Meillassoux defiende una posición llamada “materialismo especulativo”, la cual asegura haber alcanzado –por un procedimiento estrictamente racional– algo absoluto. Con este gesto afirma ir más allá de la crítica kantiana y del fideísmo. Esta postura es muy diferente de los materialismos tradicionales, pero también de todo tipo de absoluto metafísico, pues niega la validez del principio de razón suficiente y rechaza la existencia necesaria de cualquier entidad. Lo único necesario para Meillassoux es el principio que afirma que todo es contingente, y la concomitante irrazón de todo lo que existe. El autor objeta que se pueda sostener racionalmente que lo real carece de inteligibilidad, a la vez que argumenta que se puede justificar la tesis del surgimiento ex nihilo de la vida, el pensamiento, e incluso de la divinidad, con el razonamiento de que la contingencia radical de todo implica también que todo es posible, excepto lo contradictorio. ARFIL y UNL 2023-09-25 info:eu-repo/semantics/article info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion application/pdf application/epub+zip https://bibliotecavirtual.unl.edu.ar/publicaciones/index.php/Topicos/article/view/10654 10.14409/topicos.2023.45.e0050 Tópicos. Revista de Filosofía de Santa Fe; Núm. 45 (2023): Tópicos. Revista de Filosofía de Santa Fe; e0050 Tópicos. Revista de Filosofía de Santa Fe; No. 45 (2023): Tópicos. Revista de Filosofía de Santa Fe; e0050 1668-723X 1666-485X 10.14409/topicos.2023.45 spa https://bibliotecavirtual.unl.edu.ar/publicaciones/index.php/Topicos/article/view/10654/17931 https://bibliotecavirtual.unl.edu.ar/publicaciones/index.php/Topicos/article/view/10654/17932 Derechos de autor 2023 Francisco Vicente Galán Vélez https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/4.0 |
institution |
Universidad Nacional del Litoral |
institution_str |
I-26 |
repository_str |
R-133 |
container_title_str |
Biblioteca Virtual - Publicaciones (UNL) |
language |
Español |
format |
Artículo revista |
topic |
Meillassoux Reason Contingency Fideism Absolute Contemporary Philosophy Speculative Realism Meillasoux Razón Contingencia Fideísmo Absoluto Filofoía contemporánea Realismo especulativo |
spellingShingle |
Meillassoux Reason Contingency Fideism Absolute Contemporary Philosophy Speculative Realism Meillasoux Razón Contingencia Fideísmo Absoluto Filofoía contemporánea Realismo especulativo Galán Vélez, Francisco Vicente From non-Divine Omnipotence. : Meillassoux’s Rational Claim to Overcome Fideism |
topic_facet |
Meillassoux Reason Contingency Fideism Absolute Contemporary Philosophy Speculative Realism Meillasoux Razón Contingencia Fideísmo Absoluto Filofoía contemporánea Realismo especulativo |
author |
Galán Vélez, Francisco Vicente |
author_facet |
Galán Vélez, Francisco Vicente |
author_sort |
Galán Vélez, Francisco Vicente |
title |
From non-Divine Omnipotence. : Meillassoux’s Rational Claim to Overcome Fideism |
title_short |
From non-Divine Omnipotence. : Meillassoux’s Rational Claim to Overcome Fideism |
title_full |
From non-Divine Omnipotence. : Meillassoux’s Rational Claim to Overcome Fideism |
title_fullStr |
From non-Divine Omnipotence. : Meillassoux’s Rational Claim to Overcome Fideism |
title_full_unstemmed |
From non-Divine Omnipotence. : Meillassoux’s Rational Claim to Overcome Fideism |
title_sort |
from non-divine omnipotence. : meillassoux’s rational claim to overcome fideism |
description |
Quentin Meillassoux defends a position called “Speculative Materialism”, which claims to have reached –through a strictly rational procedure– something absolute. With this gesture, it asserts to go beyond Kantian criticism and fideism. This position is very different from traditional materialisms, but also from all kinds of metaphysical absolute, insofar as it denies the validity of the principle of sufficient reason and rejects the existence of a necessary entity. The only necessary thing, for Meillassoux, is the principle which states that everything is contingent, and the concomitant nonreason of every existing being. The author objects that it is possible to uphold on rational grounds that reality lacks intelligibility, and at the same time argues that it is possible to sustain the thesis of an ex nihilo emergence of life, thought, and even divinity, with the argument that the radical contingence of everything implies that everything is possible, except the contradictory .
|
publisher |
ARFIL y UNL |
publishDate |
2023 |
url |
https://bibliotecavirtual.unl.edu.ar/publicaciones/index.php/Topicos/article/view/10654 |
work_keys_str_mv |
AT galanvelezfranciscovicente fromnondivineomnipotencemeillassouxsrationalclaimtoovercomefideism AT galanvelezfranciscovicente delaomnipotencianodivinalapretensionracionalistademeillassouxdesuperarelfideismo |
first_indexed |
2024-08-13T20:39:55Z |
last_indexed |
2024-08-13T20:39:55Z |
_version_ |
1807306295620927488 |