To Believe or not to Believe, is that the Question? On Husserl’s Definition of Phantasy as the Neutrality Modification of Memoryf the neutrality of remembrance
Husserl progressively analyzes phantasy as opposed to the originality of perception—whose constitutive model is the apprehension of present contents, from the mediateness of image-consciousness—as species of indirect representation, and from the positing of memory—which requires the development of a...
| Autor principal: | |
|---|---|
| Formato: | Artículo revista |
| Lenguaje: | Español |
| Publicado: |
ARFIL y UNL
2023
|
| Materias: | |
| Acceso en línea: | https://bibliotecavirtual.unl.edu.ar/publicaciones/index.php/Topicos/article/view/10435 |
| Aporte de: |
| id |
I26-R133-article-10435 |
|---|---|
| record_format |
ojs |
| spelling |
I26-R133-article-104352023-12-15T12:21:22Z To Believe or not to Believe, is that the Question? On Husserl’s Definition of Phantasy as the Neutrality Modification of Memoryf the neutrality of remembrance Creer o no creer, ¿es esa la cuestión? Sobre la definición husserliana de la fantasía como modificación de neutralidad de la rememoración Katz, Azul Tamina Husserl Fantasía productiva Modificación de neutralidad Modificación reproductiva Husserl Productive Phantasy Neutrality Modification Reproductive Modification Husserl progressively analyzes phantasy as opposed to the originality of perception—whose constitutive model is the apprehension of present contents, from the mediateness of image-consciousness—as species of indirect representation, and from the positing of memory—which requires the development of a reproductive modification model. The analysis by contrast with other intentional experiences leads to characterizing phantasy as an inactual kind of reproductive modification or, more precisely, as “the neutrality modification of the ‘positing’ re-presentation” (Ideas I, § 111). Nevertheless, it may be objected that defining phantasy as a kind of indeterminate memory restricts its creative and free possibilities. Therefore, to account for a more adequate definition, the analysis must extend beyond the fundamental question of whether to believe or not to believe, and affirm both phantasy’s inactuality and quasi-productivity. Husserl analiza progresivamente a la fantasía por oposición a la originariedad de la percepción -cuyo modelo constitutivo es la aprehensión de contenidos presentes-, a la mediatez de la conciencia de imagen -especie de representación indirecta-, y a la posicionalidad de la rememoración -para la cual se desarrolla el modelo de la modificación reproductiva-. El presente trabajo muestra cómo, a partir de este análisis por contraste con otras vivencias intencionales, la fantasía llega a ser caracterizada como un tipo inactual de modificación reproductiva, más precisamente, como la “modificación de neutralidad de la presentificación ponente” (Ideas I, § 111). Luego de objetar que esta definición asimila a la fantasía a una suerte de recuerdo indeterminado en detrimento de su especificidad productiva y libre, propone que una caracterización más adecuada debe ir más allá de la cuestión, desde luego fundamental, de si creer o no creer, y afirmar su carácter a la vez inactual y quasi-productivo. ARFIL y UNL 2023-05-30 info:eu-repo/semantics/article info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion Texto application/pdf application/zip text/html https://bibliotecavirtual.unl.edu.ar/publicaciones/index.php/Topicos/article/view/10435 10.14409/topicos.2023.45.e0035 Tópicos. Revista de Filosofía de Santa Fe; Núm. 45 (2023): Tópicos. Revista de Filosofía de Santa Fe; e0035 Tópicos. Revista de Filosofía de Santa Fe; No. 45 (2023): Tópicos. Revista de Filosofía de Santa Fe; e0035 1668-723X 1666-485X 10.14409/topicos.2023.45 spa https://bibliotecavirtual.unl.edu.ar/publicaciones/index.php/Topicos/article/view/10435/17412 https://bibliotecavirtual.unl.edu.ar/publicaciones/index.php/Topicos/article/view/10435/17413 https://bibliotecavirtual.unl.edu.ar/publicaciones/index.php/Topicos/article/view/10435/17414 Derechos de autor 2023 Tópicos. Revista de Filosofía de Santa Fe https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/4.0 |
| institution |
Universidad Nacional del Litoral |
| institution_str |
I-26 |
| repository_str |
R-133 |
| container_title_str |
Biblioteca Virtual - Publicaciones (UNL) |
| language |
Español |
| format |
Artículo revista |
| topic |
Husserl Fantasía productiva Modificación de neutralidad Modificación reproductiva Husserl Productive Phantasy Neutrality Modification Reproductive Modification |
| spellingShingle |
Husserl Fantasía productiva Modificación de neutralidad Modificación reproductiva Husserl Productive Phantasy Neutrality Modification Reproductive Modification Katz, Azul Tamina To Believe or not to Believe, is that the Question? On Husserl’s Definition of Phantasy as the Neutrality Modification of Memoryf the neutrality of remembrance |
| topic_facet |
Husserl Fantasía productiva Modificación de neutralidad Modificación reproductiva Husserl Productive Phantasy Neutrality Modification Reproductive Modification |
| author |
Katz, Azul Tamina |
| author_facet |
Katz, Azul Tamina |
| author_sort |
Katz, Azul Tamina |
| title |
To Believe or not to Believe, is that the Question? On Husserl’s Definition of Phantasy as the Neutrality Modification of Memoryf the neutrality of remembrance |
| title_short |
To Believe or not to Believe, is that the Question? On Husserl’s Definition of Phantasy as the Neutrality Modification of Memoryf the neutrality of remembrance |
| title_full |
To Believe or not to Believe, is that the Question? On Husserl’s Definition of Phantasy as the Neutrality Modification of Memoryf the neutrality of remembrance |
| title_fullStr |
To Believe or not to Believe, is that the Question? On Husserl’s Definition of Phantasy as the Neutrality Modification of Memoryf the neutrality of remembrance |
| title_full_unstemmed |
To Believe or not to Believe, is that the Question? On Husserl’s Definition of Phantasy as the Neutrality Modification of Memoryf the neutrality of remembrance |
| title_sort |
to believe or not to believe, is that the question? on husserl’s definition of phantasy as the neutrality modification of memoryf the neutrality of remembrance |
| description |
Husserl progressively analyzes phantasy as opposed to the originality of perception—whose constitutive model is the apprehension of present contents, from the mediateness of image-consciousness—as species of indirect representation, and from the positing of memory—which requires the development of a reproductive modification model. The analysis by contrast with other intentional experiences leads to characterizing phantasy as an inactual kind of reproductive modification or, more precisely, as “the neutrality modification of the ‘positing’ re-presentation” (Ideas I, § 111). Nevertheless, it may be objected that defining phantasy as a kind of indeterminate memory restricts its creative and free possibilities. Therefore, to account for a more adequate definition, the analysis must extend beyond the fundamental question of whether to believe or not to believe, and affirm both phantasy’s inactuality and quasi-productivity. |
| publisher |
ARFIL y UNL |
| publishDate |
2023 |
| url |
https://bibliotecavirtual.unl.edu.ar/publicaciones/index.php/Topicos/article/view/10435 |
| work_keys_str_mv |
AT katzazultamina tobelieveornottobelieveisthatthequestiononhusserlsdefinitionofphantasyastheneutralitymodificationofmemoryftheneutralityofremembrance AT katzazultamina creeronocreeresesalacuestionsobreladefinicionhusserlianadelafantasiacomomodificaciondeneutralidaddelarememoracion |
| first_indexed |
2023-05-31T23:05:51Z |
| last_indexed |
2024-08-13T20:39:53Z |
| _version_ |
1807306292832763904 |