Sign language linguistics: left hand signers non-inversion of some signs as an argument in favour of a breaking perspective based on iconicity

According to Fusellier-Souza (2004), researchers in the field of sign language linguistics can be organized in two large groups: (i) those who believe that sign languages must be identical to spoken languages and, thus, base their research on the phenomena and categories previously described for the...

Descripción completa

Guardado en:
Detalles Bibliográficos
Autor principal: Val, Santiago
Formato: Artículo revista
Lenguaje:Español
Publicado: Facultad de Lenguas. Universidad Nacional del Comahue 2020
Materias:
Acceso en línea:http://revele.uncoma.edu.ar/index.php/lingustica/article/view/2920
Aporte de:
id I22-R128-article-2920
record_format ojs
institution Universidad Nacional del Comahue
institution_str I-22
repository_str R-128
container_title_str Repositorio de Revistas Electrónicas REVELE (UNComahue)
language Español
format Artículo revista
topic sign language linguistics
iconicity
Stokoe
Cuxac
lengua de señas
lingüística
iconicidad
Stokoe
Cuxac
spellingShingle sign language linguistics
iconicity
Stokoe
Cuxac
lengua de señas
lingüística
iconicidad
Stokoe
Cuxac
Val, Santiago
Sign language linguistics: left hand signers non-inversion of some signs as an argument in favour of a breaking perspective based on iconicity
topic_facet sign language linguistics
iconicity
Stokoe
Cuxac
lengua de señas
lingüística
iconicidad
Stokoe
Cuxac
author Val, Santiago
author_facet Val, Santiago
author_sort Val, Santiago
title Sign language linguistics: left hand signers non-inversion of some signs as an argument in favour of a breaking perspective based on iconicity
title_short Sign language linguistics: left hand signers non-inversion of some signs as an argument in favour of a breaking perspective based on iconicity
title_full Sign language linguistics: left hand signers non-inversion of some signs as an argument in favour of a breaking perspective based on iconicity
title_fullStr Sign language linguistics: left hand signers non-inversion of some signs as an argument in favour of a breaking perspective based on iconicity
title_full_unstemmed Sign language linguistics: left hand signers non-inversion of some signs as an argument in favour of a breaking perspective based on iconicity
title_sort sign language linguistics: left hand signers non-inversion of some signs as an argument in favour of a breaking perspective based on iconicity
description According to Fusellier-Souza (2004), researchers in the field of sign language linguistics can be organized in two large groups: (i) those who believe that sign languages must be identical to spoken languages and, thus, base their research on the phenomena and categories previously described for the latter; and (ii) those who believe that sign languages, being visual-spatial communication systems, may involve mechanisms and phenomena different from those found in spoken languages. In this article I present some arguments in favor of the second view, and identify some problems that arise from the traditional perspective (based on equivalence), which can easily be solved if we adopt a proposal which acknowledges the complexity, richness and difference of sign languages as communication systems.
publisher Facultad de Lenguas. Universidad Nacional del Comahue
publishDate 2020
url http://revele.uncoma.edu.ar/index.php/lingustica/article/view/2920
work_keys_str_mv AT valsantiago signlanguagelinguisticslefthandsignersnoninversionofsomesignsasanargumentinfavourofabreakingperspectivebasedoniconicity
AT valsantiago lalinguisticadelaslenguasdesenaslanoinversiondealgunassenasporpartedelossenanteszurdoscomoargumentoafavordeunaperspectivarupturistabasadaenlaiconicidad
bdutipo_str Revistas
_version_ 1764819788428738560