The Endless Dissent: Debates about the social dimension of knowledge in Social Epistemology

The goal of this paper compares the notion of social dimension of knowledge in two recently projects of Social Epistemology developed by A. Goldman and S. Fuller. The work in divide in four sections. In the first, expose the context and antecedents of Social Epistemology. With this background in the...

Descripción completa

Guardado en:
Detalles Bibliográficos
Autor principal: Gómez Aguilar, Iván Eliab; Facultad de Ciencias Políticas y Sociales. UNAM.
Formato: Artículo revisado por pares
Lenguaje:Español
Publicado: Facultad de Ciencias Políticas y Sociales, UNAM 2014
Materias:
Acceso en línea:http://www.revistas.unam.mx/index.php/ras/article/view/44055
http://biblioteca.clacso.edu.ar/gsdl/cgi-bin/library.cgi?a=d&c=mx/mx-047&d=article44055oai
Aporte de:
id I16-R122-article44055oai
record_format dspace
institution Consejo Latinoamericano de Ciencias Sociales
institution_str I-16
repository_str R-122
collection Red de Bibliotecas Virtuales de Ciencias Sociales (CLACSO)
language Español
topic Social Epistemology, knowledge, social dimension, A. Goldman, S. Fuller.
Epistemología Social, conocimiento, dimensión social, A. Goldman, S. Fuller.
spellingShingle Social Epistemology, knowledge, social dimension, A. Goldman, S. Fuller.
Epistemología Social, conocimiento, dimensión social, A. Goldman, S. Fuller.
Gómez Aguilar, Iván Eliab; Facultad de Ciencias Políticas y Sociales. UNAM.
The Endless Dissent: Debates about the social dimension of knowledge in Social Epistemology
topic_facet Social Epistemology, knowledge, social dimension, A. Goldman, S. Fuller.
Epistemología Social, conocimiento, dimensión social, A. Goldman, S. Fuller.
description The goal of this paper compares the notion of social dimension of knowledge in two recently projects of Social Epistemology developed by A. Goldman and S. Fuller. The work in divide in four sections. In the first, expose the context and antecedents of Social Epistemology. With this background in the next two sections, I note in a brief way Goldman’s and Fuller’s explanations about why they consider in their own perspective the feasibility and necessity to develop normative judgements about social dimension of knowledge. Finally, in the last section I conclude talking about the need of still looking for meeting points between the normative and the descriptive perspectives of knowledge, to be able to build correct and multidimentional images of normativity from social epistemology and sociology.
format Artículo revisado por pares
Artículo revisado por pares
author Gómez Aguilar, Iván Eliab; Facultad de Ciencias Políticas y Sociales. UNAM.
author_facet Gómez Aguilar, Iván Eliab; Facultad de Ciencias Políticas y Sociales. UNAM.
author_sort Gómez Aguilar, Iván Eliab; Facultad de Ciencias Políticas y Sociales. UNAM.
title The Endless Dissent: Debates about the social dimension of knowledge in Social Epistemology
title_short The Endless Dissent: Debates about the social dimension of knowledge in Social Epistemology
title_full The Endless Dissent: Debates about the social dimension of knowledge in Social Epistemology
title_fullStr The Endless Dissent: Debates about the social dimension of knowledge in Social Epistemology
title_full_unstemmed The Endless Dissent: Debates about the social dimension of knowledge in Social Epistemology
title_sort endless dissent: debates about the social dimension of knowledge in social epistemology
publisher Facultad de Ciencias Políticas y Sociales, UNAM
publishDate 2014
url http://www.revistas.unam.mx/index.php/ras/article/view/44055
http://biblioteca.clacso.edu.ar/gsdl/cgi-bin/library.cgi?a=d&c=mx/mx-047&d=article44055oai
work_keys_str_mv AT gomezaguilarivaneliabfacultaddecienciaspoliticasysocialesunam theendlessdissentdebatesaboutthesocialdimensionofknowledgeinsocialepistemology
AT gomezaguilarivaneliabfacultaddecienciaspoliticasysocialesunam eldisensoinagotabledebatessobreladimensionsocialdelconocimientoenlaepistemologiasocial
AT gomezaguilarivaneliabfacultaddecienciaspoliticasysocialesunam endlessdissentdebatesaboutthesocialdimensionofknowledgeinsocialepistemology
bdutipo_str Repositorios
_version_ 1764820437376696321