The Dark Side of state recognizance. ¿bureaucratization of claims or epistemic violence?

Mostrar todas las versiones(2)

The Argentinean State has been redefining his relationship with indigenous people through various actions for recognition of their rights, and specific claims; developing various public policies, programs and projects through specific institutions and agencies that have this “renewed” relationship a...

Descripción completa

Guardado en:
Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Guiñazú, Verónica Samanta, Tolosa, Sandra
Formato: Artículo revista
Lenguaje:Español
Publicado: Investigaciones Socio-Históricas Regionales (ISHIR) Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas (CONICET) Universidad Nacional de Rosario (UNR) 2014
Materias:
Bureaucratization - Epistemic Violence - Institutional Violence - Native People
Acceso en línea:https://ojs.rosario-conicet.gov.ar/index.php/AvancesCesor/article/view/v11n11a04
Aporte de:
Avances del CESOR (CONICET) de Universidad Nacional de Rosario
id I15-R237-article-364
record_format ojs
spelling I15-R237-article-3642020-12-07T22:09:52Z The Dark Side of state recognizance. ¿bureaucratization of claims or epistemic violence? El Lado Oscuro del reconocimiento estatal. ¿Burocratizacion del reclamo o violencia epistemica? Guiñazú, Verónica Samanta Tolosa, Sandra Bureaucratization - Epistemic Violence - Institutional Violence - Native People The Argentinean State has been redefining his relationship with indigenous people through various actions for recognition of their rights, and specific claims; developing various public policies, programs and projects through specific institutions and agencies that have this “renewed” relationship as product of a genuine appreciation for multiculturalism and ethnic identities predate the state. In contrast, we observed that the specific forms of implementation of these other logics underlying evidence, demonstrating the profound contradiction in the conception of the relationship between the state and the indigenous people. This article analyzes the ways that the state uses to recognize the ethnic processes can become determined by epistemic and institutional violence. To do this, we focus on application, registration and formalization procedures that Indigenous People must perform to achieve recognition of their communities and organizations. In that sense, we are interested to denature the following purposes of discussing the alleged innocence or neutrality of forms and formal requirements for state recognition, to demonstrate how these, in both tools and institutions that operate them, respond to underlying ideology far from fully recognize and respect the diversity and particularities of Indigenous People acts imposing criteria, categories and forms of identity arising from the logic of the state El Estado argentino ha ido redefiniendo su relación con los Pueblos Originarios a través de diversas acciones de reconocimiento de sus derechos, particularidades y reclamos, elaborando variadas políticas públicas, programas y proyectos a través de instituciones y agencias específicas que presentan esta “renovada” relación como producto de un genuino reconocimiento a la pluriculturalidad y a las identidades étnicas preexistentes al Estado. Contrariamente, observamos que las formas concretas de ejecución de estos evidencian otras lógicas subyacentes, que demuestran la profunda contradicción que existe en la concepción misma de esta relación entre el Estado y los Pueblos. Este artículo analiza cómo las formas que el Estado utiliza para el reconocimiento de la pluralidad étnica pueden transformarse en procesos determinados por la violencia epistémica e institucional. Para ello, nos centramos en los procedimientos de petición, inscripción y formalización que los Pueblos Originarios deben realizar para lograr el reconocimiento de sus Comunidades y Organizaciones. En ese sentido, nos interesa desnaturalizar estos procedimientos a fines de discutir la pretendida inocencia o neutralidad de los formularios y requisitos formales de reconocimiento estatal, para demostrarcómo éstos, en tanto herramientas, así como las instituciones que los operan, responden a una ideología subyacente que lejos de reconocer y respetar plenamente las diversidad y  particularidades de los Pueblos, actúa imponiéndoles criterios, categorías y formas de la identidad que surgen de la propia lógica del Estado. Investigaciones Socio-Históricas Regionales (ISHIR) Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas (CONICET) Universidad Nacional de Rosario (UNR) 2014-11-11 info:eu-repo/semantics/article info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion Artículo evaluado por pares application/pdf https://ojs.rosario-conicet.gov.ar/index.php/AvancesCesor/article/view/v11n11a04 10.35305/ac.v11i11.364 Avances del Cesor; No. 11 (2014): Second Semester; 77-98 Avances del Cesor; Núm. 11 (2014): Segundo Semestre de 2014; 77-98 2422-6580 1514-3899 spa https://ojs.rosario-conicet.gov.ar/index.php/AvancesCesor/article/view/v11n11a04/417
institution Universidad Nacional de Rosario
institution_str I-15
repository_str R-237
container_title_str Avances del CESOR (CONICET)
language Español
format Artículo revista
topic Bureaucratization - Epistemic Violence - Institutional Violence - Native People
spellingShingle Bureaucratization - Epistemic Violence - Institutional Violence - Native People
Guiñazú, Verónica Samanta
Tolosa, Sandra
The Dark Side of state recognizance. ¿bureaucratization of claims or epistemic violence?
topic_facet Bureaucratization - Epistemic Violence - Institutional Violence - Native People
author Guiñazú, Verónica Samanta
Tolosa, Sandra
author_facet Guiñazú, Verónica Samanta
Tolosa, Sandra
author_sort Guiñazú, Verónica Samanta
title The Dark Side of state recognizance. ¿bureaucratization of claims or epistemic violence?
title_short The Dark Side of state recognizance. ¿bureaucratization of claims or epistemic violence?
title_full The Dark Side of state recognizance. ¿bureaucratization of claims or epistemic violence?
title_fullStr The Dark Side of state recognizance. ¿bureaucratization of claims or epistemic violence?
title_full_unstemmed The Dark Side of state recognizance. ¿bureaucratization of claims or epistemic violence?
title_sort dark side of state recognizance. ¿bureaucratization of claims or epistemic violence?
description The Argentinean State has been redefining his relationship with indigenous people through various actions for recognition of their rights, and specific claims; developing various public policies, programs and projects through specific institutions and agencies that have this “renewed” relationship as product of a genuine appreciation for multiculturalism and ethnic identities predate the state. In contrast, we observed that the specific forms of implementation of these other logics underlying evidence, demonstrating the profound contradiction in the conception of the relationship between the state and the indigenous people. This article analyzes the ways that the state uses to recognize the ethnic processes can become determined by epistemic and institutional violence. To do this, we focus on application, registration and formalization procedures that Indigenous People must perform to achieve recognition of their communities and organizations. In that sense, we are interested to denature the following purposes of discussing the alleged innocence or neutrality of forms and formal requirements for state recognition, to demonstrate how these, in both tools and institutions that operate them, respond to underlying ideology far from fully recognize and respect the diversity and particularities of Indigenous People acts imposing criteria, categories and forms of identity arising from the logic of the state
publisher Investigaciones Socio-Históricas Regionales (ISHIR) Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas (CONICET) Universidad Nacional de Rosario (UNR)
publishDate 2014
url https://ojs.rosario-conicet.gov.ar/index.php/AvancesCesor/article/view/v11n11a04
work_keys_str_mv AT guinazuveronicasamanta thedarksideofstaterecognizancebureaucratizationofclaimsorepistemicviolence
AT tolosasandra thedarksideofstaterecognizancebureaucratizationofclaimsorepistemicviolence
AT guinazuveronicasamanta elladooscurodelreconocimientoestatalburocratizaciondelreclamooviolenciaepistemica
AT tolosasandra elladooscurodelreconocimientoestatalburocratizaciondelreclamooviolenciaepistemica
AT guinazuveronicasamanta darksideofstaterecognizancebureaucratizationofclaimsorepistemicviolence
AT tolosasandra darksideofstaterecognizancebureaucratizationofclaimsorepistemicviolence
first_indexed 2023-06-26T22:52:00Z
last_indexed 2023-06-26T22:52:00Z
_version_ 1769807460909973504

Ejemplares similares