Public policies as scenarios of tension between technicalities and political participation. The case of the draft bill on Indigenous Community Property in Argentina (2015)

This article analyzes the elaboration of indigenous participatory public policies through two variables: the languages ​​and state requirements -written records and temporality- with effects of technicality and neutrality; and the political praxis and resource management of actors such as native peo...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autor principal: Manzanelli, Macarena Del Pilar
Formato: Artículo revista
Lenguaje:Español
Publicado: Universidad Nacional de Rosario - Centro de Investigaciones Sociales (CIS) IDES /CONICET 2023
Materias:
participación
políticas públicas
Propiedad comunitaria indígena
pueblos originarios
participation
public policies
Indigenous Community Property
indigenous peoples
Acceso en línea:https://www.estudiossocialesdelestado.org/index.php/ese/article/view/298
Aporte de:
Estudios Sociales del Estado de Universidad Nacional de Rosario
id I15-R234-article-298
record_format ojs
spelling I15-R234-article-2982023-12-12T13:08:01Z Public policies as scenarios of tension between technicalities and political participation. The case of the draft bill on Indigenous Community Property in Argentina (2015) Políticas públicas como escenarios de tensión entre tecnicismos y participación política indígena. Debates por los requisitos y tiempos estatales para definir la Propiedad Comunitaria Indígena en la Argentina (2015) Manzanelli, Macarena Del Pilar participación políticas públicas Propiedad comunitaria indígena pueblos originarios participation public policies Indigenous Community Property indigenous peoples This article analyzes the elaboration of indigenous participatory public policies through two variables: the languages ​​and state requirements -written records and temporality- with effects of technicality and neutrality; and the political praxis and resource management of actors such as native peoples. I present an ethnographic study of the debates on the national Indigenous Community Property bill between a group of indigenous peoples and officials of the National Institute of Indigenous Affairs in 2015. I identified three situations: exchanges for state requirements to define PCI; management of the times of referents of native peoples, questioning the institutional ones; and the alliances woven by them to achieve their parliamentary state. I conclude that public policies constitute networks of power, rationalities and polysemic social actions with tensions between institutionalized state channels and the practices of different actors. There, legitimations are disputed at the discursive-symbolic level, through state technicalities that restrict the original agency, and in the negotiations between original peoples and state-political actors. These praxis make visible a non-essentialized indigenous agency with conditions: its times, different from the bureaucratic-state ones, the consultation, its political capacity for maneuver and positions before broad political debates such as the definition of country models. Este artículo analiza la elaboración de políticas públicas participativas indigenistas mediante dos variables: los lenguajes y requisitos estatales -registros escritos y de temporalidad- con efectos de tecnicismo y neutralidad; y las praxis políticas y manejo de recursos de actores como son pueblos originarios. Presento un trabajo etnográfico de los debates del anteproyecto de ley de Propiedad Comunitaria Indígena nacional entre un colectivo de pueblos originarios y funcionarios del Instituto Nacional de Asuntos Indígenas en 2015. Identifiqué tres situaciones: intercambios por los requisitos estatales para definir la PCI; gestión de los tiempos de referentes de pueblos originarios, interpelando a los institucionales; y las alianzas tejidas por éstos para alcanzar su estado parlamentario. Concluyo que las políticas públicas constituyen entramados de poder, racionalidades y acciones sociales polisémicas con tensiones entre los canales estatales institucionalizados y las prácticas de distintos actores. Allí se disputan legitimaciones en el plano discursivo-simbólico, mediante tecnicismos estatales que restringen la agencia originaria, y en las negociaciones entre pueblos originarios y actores estatales-políticos. Dichas praxis visibilizan una agencia indígena no esencializada con condiciones: sus tiempos, distintos a los burocráticos-estatales, la consulta, su capacidad política de maniobra y posicionamientos ante debates políticos amplios como la definición de modelos de país. Universidad Nacional de Rosario - Centro de Investigaciones Sociales (CIS) IDES /CONICET 2023-12-12 info:eu-repo/semantics/article info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion Artículo revisado por pares application/pdf https://www.estudiossocialesdelestado.org/index.php/ese/article/view/298 10.35305/ese.v9i18.298 Estudios Sociales del Estado; Vol. 9 Núm. 18 (2023): Varia 2422-7803 spa https://www.estudiossocialesdelestado.org/index.php/ese/article/view/298/271
institution Universidad Nacional de Rosario
institution_str I-15
repository_str R-234
container_title_str Estudios Sociales del Estado
language Español
format Artículo revista
topic participación
políticas públicas
Propiedad comunitaria indígena
pueblos originarios
participation
public policies
Indigenous Community Property
indigenous peoples
spellingShingle participación
políticas públicas
Propiedad comunitaria indígena
pueblos originarios
participation
public policies
Indigenous Community Property
indigenous peoples
Manzanelli, Macarena Del Pilar
Public policies as scenarios of tension between technicalities and political participation. The case of the draft bill on Indigenous Community Property in Argentina (2015)
topic_facet participación
políticas públicas
Propiedad comunitaria indígena
pueblos originarios
participation
public policies
Indigenous Community Property
indigenous peoples
author Manzanelli, Macarena Del Pilar
author_facet Manzanelli, Macarena Del Pilar
author_sort Manzanelli, Macarena Del Pilar
title Public policies as scenarios of tension between technicalities and political participation. The case of the draft bill on Indigenous Community Property in Argentina (2015)
title_short Public policies as scenarios of tension between technicalities and political participation. The case of the draft bill on Indigenous Community Property in Argentina (2015)
title_full Public policies as scenarios of tension between technicalities and political participation. The case of the draft bill on Indigenous Community Property in Argentina (2015)
title_fullStr Public policies as scenarios of tension between technicalities and political participation. The case of the draft bill on Indigenous Community Property in Argentina (2015)
title_full_unstemmed Public policies as scenarios of tension between technicalities and political participation. The case of the draft bill on Indigenous Community Property in Argentina (2015)
title_sort public policies as scenarios of tension between technicalities and political participation. the case of the draft bill on indigenous community property in argentina (2015)
description This article analyzes the elaboration of indigenous participatory public policies through two variables: the languages ​​and state requirements -written records and temporality- with effects of technicality and neutrality; and the political praxis and resource management of actors such as native peoples. I present an ethnographic study of the debates on the national Indigenous Community Property bill between a group of indigenous peoples and officials of the National Institute of Indigenous Affairs in 2015. I identified three situations: exchanges for state requirements to define PCI; management of the times of referents of native peoples, questioning the institutional ones; and the alliances woven by them to achieve their parliamentary state. I conclude that public policies constitute networks of power, rationalities and polysemic social actions with tensions between institutionalized state channels and the practices of different actors. There, legitimations are disputed at the discursive-symbolic level, through state technicalities that restrict the original agency, and in the negotiations between original peoples and state-political actors. These praxis make visible a non-essentialized indigenous agency with conditions: its times, different from the bureaucratic-state ones, the consultation, its political capacity for maneuver and positions before broad political debates such as the definition of country models.
publisher Universidad Nacional de Rosario - Centro de Investigaciones Sociales (CIS) IDES /CONICET
publishDate 2023
url https://www.estudiossocialesdelestado.org/index.php/ese/article/view/298
work_keys_str_mv AT manzanellimacarenadelpilar publicpoliciesasscenariosoftensionbetweentechnicalitiesandpoliticalparticipationthecaseofthedraftbillonindigenouscommunitypropertyinargentina2015
AT manzanellimacarenadelpilar politicaspublicascomoescenariosdetensionentretecnicismosyparticipacionpoliticaindigenadebatesporlosrequisitosytiemposestatalesparadefinirlapropiedadcomunitariaindigenaenlaargentina2015
first_indexed 2024-08-12T21:42:08Z
last_indexed 2024-08-12T21:42:08Z
_version_ 1807219612777971712

Ejemplares similares