Bolivia and Chile before the ICJ: : the end for the prosecution of maritime claims
On April 24, 2013 Bolivia filed a lawsuit versus Chile in the International Court of Justice (ICJ) claiming the lack of compliance to negotiate a sovereign exit to the Pacific Ocean. Unlike other moments of the bilateral relationship, the object of the claim was not a request of revision or annulmen...
| Autor principal: | |
|---|---|
| Formato: | Artículo revista |
| Lenguaje: | Español |
| Publicado: |
Universidad Nacional de Rosario
2020
|
| Materias: | |
| Acceso en línea: | https://cupea.unr.edu.ar/index.php/revista/article/view/7 |
| Aporte de: |
| id |
I15-R226-article-7 |
|---|---|
| record_format |
ojs |
| spelling |
I15-R226-article-72020-06-02T15:17:04Z Bolivia and Chile before the ICJ: : the end for the prosecution of maritime claims Bolivia y Chile ante la CIJ: : punto final a la judicialización del reclamo marítimo Ceppi, Natalia Bolivia Chile cuestión marítima Corte Internacional de Justicia Bolivia Chile maritime claim International Court of Justice On April 24, 2013 Bolivia filed a lawsuit versus Chile in the International Court of Justice (ICJ) claiming the lack of compliance to negotiate a sovereign exit to the Pacific Ocean. Unlike other moments of the bilateral relationship, the object of the claim was not a request of revision or annulment of the 1904 Treaty, but rather the focus was on the presence of different facts that would prove the existence of this obligation between the parts. After going through the written and oral phases established by regulation, the International Court dismissed, on October 1 2018, the bolivian lawsuit, ending the legal approach to the conflict. This article identifies the principal topics across Bolivia and Chile´s positions during the trial and then reflects on the future of this complex and particular relation. El 24 de abril de 2013 Bolivia presentó una demanda versus Chile ante la Corte Internacional de Justicia (CIJ) reclamando la falta de cumplimiento por parte de su vecino de negociar una salida soberana al Océano Pacífico. A diferencia de otros momentos de la relación bilateral, el objeto del reclamo no consistió en denunciar el Tratado de 1904, sino que el foco estuvo puesto en la presencia de un sinnúmero de hechos que darían cuenta de la existencia de dicha obligación entre las partes. Luego de atravesar las fases escritas y orales establecidas por reglamento, el tribunal internacional desestimó, el 1º de octubre de 2018, la demanda boliviana, poniendo así punto final al abordaje jurídico del conflicto. En este artículo, se identifican los ejes centrales que atraviesan transversalmente las posturas de Bolivia y Chile, como demandante y demandado, respectivamente, para luego, reflexionar sobre el futuro de este vínculo tan complejo y particular Universidad Nacional de Rosario 2020-05-21 info:eu-repo/semantics/article info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion application/pdf https://cupea.unr.edu.ar/index.php/revista/article/view/7 10.35305/cc.vi130.7 CUPEA Cuadernos de Política Exterior Argentina; Núm. 130 (2019): Diciembre; 63-80 1852-7213 0326-7806 spa https://cupea.unr.edu.ar/index.php/revista/article/view/7/4 Derechos de autor 2020 CUPEA Cuadernos de Política Exterior Argentina https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/4.0/ |
| institution |
Universidad Nacional de Rosario |
| institution_str |
I-15 |
| repository_str |
R-226 |
| container_title_str |
Cuadernos de Política Exterior Argentina |
| language |
Español |
| format |
Artículo revista |
| topic |
Bolivia Chile cuestión marítima Corte Internacional de Justicia Bolivia Chile maritime claim International Court of Justice |
| spellingShingle |
Bolivia Chile cuestión marítima Corte Internacional de Justicia Bolivia Chile maritime claim International Court of Justice Ceppi, Natalia Bolivia and Chile before the ICJ: : the end for the prosecution of maritime claims |
| topic_facet |
Bolivia Chile cuestión marítima Corte Internacional de Justicia Bolivia Chile maritime claim International Court of Justice |
| author |
Ceppi, Natalia |
| author_facet |
Ceppi, Natalia |
| author_sort |
Ceppi, Natalia |
| title |
Bolivia and Chile before the ICJ: : the end for the prosecution of maritime claims |
| title_short |
Bolivia and Chile before the ICJ: : the end for the prosecution of maritime claims |
| title_full |
Bolivia and Chile before the ICJ: : the end for the prosecution of maritime claims |
| title_fullStr |
Bolivia and Chile before the ICJ: : the end for the prosecution of maritime claims |
| title_full_unstemmed |
Bolivia and Chile before the ICJ: : the end for the prosecution of maritime claims |
| title_sort |
bolivia and chile before the icj: : the end for the prosecution of maritime claims |
| description |
On April 24, 2013 Bolivia filed a lawsuit versus Chile in the International Court of Justice (ICJ) claiming the lack of compliance to negotiate a sovereign exit to the Pacific Ocean. Unlike other moments of the bilateral relationship, the object of the claim was not a request of revision or annulment of the 1904 Treaty, but rather the focus was on the presence of different facts that would prove the existence of this obligation between the parts. After going through the written and oral phases established by regulation, the International Court dismissed, on October 1 2018, the bolivian lawsuit, ending the legal approach to the conflict. This article identifies the principal topics across Bolivia and Chile´s positions during the trial and then reflects on the future of this complex and particular relation. |
| publisher |
Universidad Nacional de Rosario |
| publishDate |
2020 |
| url |
https://cupea.unr.edu.ar/index.php/revista/article/view/7 |
| work_keys_str_mv |
AT ceppinatalia boliviaandchilebeforetheicjtheendfortheprosecutionofmaritimeclaims AT ceppinatalia boliviaychileantelacijpuntofinalalajudicializaciondelreclamomaritimo |
| first_indexed |
2023-05-18T21:18:43Z |
| last_indexed |
2023-05-18T21:18:43Z |
| _version_ |
1766268310318481408 |