Barthes con Lacan: lecturas impertinentes

Analist/Analisante, writer/reader: Reading dilutes any pair of oppositions. If reading occures you can no longer delimit identity borders: writer/reader but, instead, we can afirm it reads, it writes. We will try to specify what way the reading in Barthes resists being systematized, and in this poin...

Descripción completa

Guardado en:
Detalles Bibliográficos
Autor principal: Kohan, Alexandra
Formato: Artículo revista
Lenguaje:Español
Publicado: CETYCLI 2019
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://badebec.unr.edu.ar/index.php/badebec/article/view/402
Aporte de:
id I15-R206-article-402
record_format ojs
spelling I15-R206-article-4022019-09-29T14:10:56Z Barthes con Lacan: lecturas impertinentes Kohan, Alexandra Lectura Barthes Lacan Impertinencia Analist/Analisante, writer/reader: Reading dilutes any pair of oppositions. If reading occures you can no longer delimit identity borders: writer/reader but, instead, we can afirm it reads, it writes. We will try to specify what way the reading in Barthes resists being systematized, and in this point, the way Barthes shifts relevance to the congenital impertinence of reading. The reading is impertinent, not because of “our lack of genius”, but because it, the reading, causes failure, at the same time as the “search for relevance”, to the “very concept of relevance”. Analista/analizante, escritor/leyente: la lectura viene a diluir cualquier par de oposiciones. Si la lectura ocurre, ya no pueden delimitarse las fronteras identitarias del escritor y del lector y, a cambio, podríamos afirmar que eso se lee, eso se escribe; eso lee, eso escribe. Intentaremos precisar de qué modo la lectura en Barthes se resiste a ser sistematizada y, a la vez, en este punto, el modo en que Barthes desplaza la pertinencia a la impertinencia congénita de la lectura. La lectura es impertinente, no por “nuestra carencia de genialidad”, sino porque ella, la lectura, hace fracasar, a la vez que la “búsqueda de una pertinencia”, al “mismísimo concepto de pertinencia”. CETYCLI 2019-09-24 info:eu-repo/semantics/article info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion application/pdf https://badebec.unr.edu.ar/index.php/badebec/article/view/402 10.35305/b.v9i17.402 Badebec; Vol. 9 Núm. 17 (2019): Septiembre 2019; 123-133 1853-9580 spa https://badebec.unr.edu.ar/index.php/badebec/article/view/402/374
institution Universidad Nacional de Rosario
institution_str I-15
repository_str R-206
container_title_str Badebec
language Español
format Artículo revista
topic Lectura
Barthes
Lacan
Impertinencia
spellingShingle Lectura
Barthes
Lacan
Impertinencia
Kohan, Alexandra
Barthes con Lacan: lecturas impertinentes
topic_facet Lectura
Barthes
Lacan
Impertinencia
author Kohan, Alexandra
author_facet Kohan, Alexandra
author_sort Kohan, Alexandra
title Barthes con Lacan: lecturas impertinentes
title_short Barthes con Lacan: lecturas impertinentes
title_full Barthes con Lacan: lecturas impertinentes
title_fullStr Barthes con Lacan: lecturas impertinentes
title_full_unstemmed Barthes con Lacan: lecturas impertinentes
title_sort barthes con lacan: lecturas impertinentes
description Analist/Analisante, writer/reader: Reading dilutes any pair of oppositions. If reading occures you can no longer delimit identity borders: writer/reader but, instead, we can afirm it reads, it writes. We will try to specify what way the reading in Barthes resists being systematized, and in this point, the way Barthes shifts relevance to the congenital impertinence of reading. The reading is impertinent, not because of “our lack of genius”, but because it, the reading, causes failure, at the same time as the “search for relevance”, to the “very concept of relevance”.
publisher CETYCLI
publishDate 2019
url https://badebec.unr.edu.ar/index.php/badebec/article/view/402
work_keys_str_mv AT kohanalexandra barthesconlacanlecturasimpertinentes
first_indexed 2023-05-11T18:50:44Z
last_indexed 2023-05-11T18:50:44Z
_version_ 1765624821035565056