The Cogito and consciousness The scopic field and traits of the oneiric world

The objective of this paper is to analyze the status of both consciousness and the cogito, from the point of view of the scopic field. To accomplish it, we examine the differences between waking life and oneiric experience. Methodology is theoretical, it consists on the analysis of several psychoana...

Descripción completa

Guardado en:
Detalles Bibliográficos
Autor principal: Carignano, Bruno
Formato: Artículo revista
Lenguaje:Español
Publicado: Departamento de Psicoanálisis de la Facultad de Psicología de la Universidad Nacional de Rosario 2017
Materias:
El cogito
Conciencia
Narcisismo
Sueño
Campo escópico
The cogito
Consciousness
Narcissism
Dream
Scopic field
Acceso en línea:https://psicoanalisisenlauniversidad.unr.edu.ar/index.php/RPU/article/view/12
Aporte de:
Psicoanálisis en la Universidad de Universidad Nacional de Rosario
id I15-R204-article-12
record_format ojs
spelling I15-R204-article-122020-07-03T21:56:27Z The Cogito and consciousness The scopic field and traits of the oneiric world El cogito y la conciencia Lo escópico y las particularidades del mundo onírico Carignano, Bruno El cogito Conciencia Narcisismo Sueño Campo escópico The cogito Consciousness Narcissism Dream Scopic field The objective of this paper is to analyze the status of both consciousness and the cogito, from the point of view of the scopic field. To accomplish it, we examine the differences between waking life and oneiric experience. Methodology is theoretical, it consists on the analysis of several psychoanalytic and philosophical works. First of all, we interrogate the idea of dream as an argument for the conception of an heterotopic consciousness, taking into account both Lacan’s and Sartre’s theories. Our aim is to approach the problem of a non unitary consciousness, related to the disguising that the ego produces. As a counterpart, oneiric phenomenon is a crucial argument to support the conception of a consciousness without an ego. Discrepancy of the cogito between dream and madness lead us to conceive, from another angle, the relation between dream and the cogito. Afterwards, we analyze the idea of a voyeuristic but not exhibitionist world. We conclude that dream should be linked, as a scopic phenomenon, to the absence of a narcissistic support for the subject. The geometrical-Cartesian subject appears spread among the images of the dream, the cogito apprehension is then just scopic in the restricted sense of the waking life. El objetivo del artículo es analizar los estatutos del cogito y de la conciencia desde el punto de vista escópico, en la disyunción entre vida diurna y experiencia onírica. La metodología, de tipo teórico, consiste en el análisis de algunos textos filosóficos y psicoanalíticos a partir de una serie de problemas esbozados. Comenzamos por interrogar el lugar argumental del sueño en la concepción de una conciencia heterótopa, apoyándonos en teorizaciones de Lacan y Sartre; el fin es avanzar sobre la dificultad de pensar una conciencia no unitaria, por el enmascaramiento que el yo produce. Como contrapartida, el fenómeno onírico es un argumento crucial para concebir una conciencia sin yo. La discrepancia del lugar del cogito respecto del sueño y la locura nos allana el camino para mejor dilucidar la relación entre cogito y sueño. Desbrozamos luego el planteo del mundo como omnivoyeur pero no exhibicionista a partir de las distinciones efectuadas. Concluimos que el sueño como fenómeno escópico debe circunscribirse a la ausencia de soporte narcisista como anclaje de un sujeto, pues el sujeto geometral cartesiano está diseminado en las imágenes del sueño; la captación del cogito cartesiano es, pues, sólo escópica en el sentido restringido de la vida diurna Departamento de Psicoanálisis de la Facultad de Psicología de la Universidad Nacional de Rosario 2017-08-31 info:eu-repo/semantics/article info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion Artículo evaluado por pares application/pdf https://psicoanalisisenlauniversidad.unr.edu.ar/index.php/RPU/article/view/12 10.35305/rpu.v0i1.12 PSICOANÁLISIS EN LA UNIVERSIDAD; No. 1 (2017); 72-90 PSICOANÁLISIS EN LA UNIVERSIDAD; Núm. 1 (2017); 72-90 PSICOANÁLISIS EN LA UNIVERSIDAD; No 1 (2017); 72-90 PSICOANÁLISIS EN LA UNIVERSIDAD; n. 1 (2017); 72-90 2683-9938 2591-2844 spa https://psicoanalisisenlauniversidad.unr.edu.ar/index.php/RPU/article/view/12/35
institution Universidad Nacional de Rosario
institution_str I-15
repository_str R-204
container_title_str Psicoanálisis en la Universidad
language Español
format Artículo revista
topic El cogito
Conciencia
Narcisismo
Sueño
Campo escópico
The cogito
Consciousness
Narcissism
Dream
Scopic field
spellingShingle El cogito
Conciencia
Narcisismo
Sueño
Campo escópico
The cogito
Consciousness
Narcissism
Dream
Scopic field
Carignano, Bruno
The Cogito and consciousness The scopic field and traits of the oneiric world
topic_facet El cogito
Conciencia
Narcisismo
Sueño
Campo escópico
The cogito
Consciousness
Narcissism
Dream
Scopic field
author Carignano, Bruno
author_facet Carignano, Bruno
author_sort Carignano, Bruno
title The Cogito and consciousness The scopic field and traits of the oneiric world
title_short The Cogito and consciousness The scopic field and traits of the oneiric world
title_full The Cogito and consciousness The scopic field and traits of the oneiric world
title_fullStr The Cogito and consciousness The scopic field and traits of the oneiric world
title_full_unstemmed The Cogito and consciousness The scopic field and traits of the oneiric world
title_sort cogito and consciousness the scopic field and traits of the oneiric world
description The objective of this paper is to analyze the status of both consciousness and the cogito, from the point of view of the scopic field. To accomplish it, we examine the differences between waking life and oneiric experience. Methodology is theoretical, it consists on the analysis of several psychoanalytic and philosophical works. First of all, we interrogate the idea of dream as an argument for the conception of an heterotopic consciousness, taking into account both Lacan’s and Sartre’s theories. Our aim is to approach the problem of a non unitary consciousness, related to the disguising that the ego produces. As a counterpart, oneiric phenomenon is a crucial argument to support the conception of a consciousness without an ego. Discrepancy of the cogito between dream and madness lead us to conceive, from another angle, the relation between dream and the cogito. Afterwards, we analyze the idea of a voyeuristic but not exhibitionist world. We conclude that dream should be linked, as a scopic phenomenon, to the absence of a narcissistic support for the subject. The geometrical-Cartesian subject appears spread among the images of the dream, the cogito apprehension is then just scopic in the restricted sense of the waking life.
publisher Departamento de Psicoanálisis de la Facultad de Psicología de la Universidad Nacional de Rosario
publishDate 2017
url https://psicoanalisisenlauniversidad.unr.edu.ar/index.php/RPU/article/view/12
work_keys_str_mv AT carignanobruno thecogitoandconsciousnessthescopicfieldandtraitsoftheoneiricworld
AT carignanobruno elcogitoylaconciencialoescopicoylasparticularidadesdelmundoonirico
AT carignanobruno cogitoandconsciousnessthescopicfieldandtraitsoftheoneiricworld
first_indexed 2023-05-11T18:45:48Z
last_indexed 2023-05-11T18:45:48Z
_version_ 1765624511019876352

Ejemplares similares