Institutional turn: Carl Schmitt or Santi Romano?

The article analyzes the problem of institutionalism in the work of Carl Schmitt and Santi Romano from the perspective of the critique of political theology. The author argues that it is a difficult operation due to the deep roots of political theology in the constitution of the modern political lex...

Descripción completa

Guardado en:
Detalles Bibliográficos
Autor principal: Esposito, Roberto
Formato: Artículo revista
Lenguaje:Español
Publicado: Universidad Nacional de Rosario 2022
Materias:
Institutionalism
Political Theology
Constituent Power
Carl Schmitt
Santi Romano
Institucionalismo
Teología Política
Poder Constituyente
Acceso en línea:https://perspectivasrcs.unr.edu.ar/index.php/PRCS/article/view/575
Aporte de:
Perspectivas – Revista de Ciencias Sociales de Universidad Nacional de Rosario
id I15-R203-article-575
record_format ojs
spelling I15-R203-article-5752022-07-22T18:48:35Z Institutional turn: Carl Schmitt or Santi Romano? Institutional turn.: ¿Carl Schmitt o Santi Romano? Esposito, Roberto Institutionalism Political Theology Constituent Power Carl Schmitt Santi Romano Institucionalismo Teología Política Poder Constituyente Carl Schmitt Santi Romano The article analyzes the problem of institutionalism in the work of Carl Schmitt and Santi Romano from the perspective of the critique of political theology. The author argues that it is a difficult operation due to the deep roots of political theology in the constitution of the modern political lexicon. Next, it probably reconstructs the controversy between Schmitt and Benjamin on political theology and then examines the problematic of constituent power in Schmitt's work and in the contemporary philosophical-political debate. After penetrating into schmittian institutionalism and its commitments to the Nazi regime, arguing that Schmitt will not come out of decisionist monism losing all innovative analytical potential in the field of institutionalism. Finally, the author delves into Romano's institutionalist thought, highlighting the relationship between law and its "outside" in three dimensions: the non-legal, the pre-legal and the anti-legal. After studying these three dimensions, the author concludes that Romano's legal ontology is protected from any theological-political excess El artículo analiza el problema del institucionalismo en la obra de Carl Schmitt y Santi Romano desde el horizonte de la crítica de la teología política. El autor sostiene que se trata de una operación difícil por las profundas raíces de la teología política en la constitución del léxico político moderno. Seguidamente, reconstruye brevemente la controversia entre Schmitt y Benjamin sobre la teología política y examina la problemática del poder constituyente en la obra de Schmitt y en el debate filosófico-político contemporáneo. Después penetra en el institucionalismo schmittiano y sus compromisos con el régimen nazi, argumentando que Schmitt no logró salir del monismo del decisionismo, perdiendo todo potencial analítico innovador en el campo del institucionalismo. Finalmente, el autor se adentra en el pensamiento institucionalista de Romano poniendo de relieve la relación del derecho con su “afuera” en tres dimensiones: lo no-jurídico, lo pre-jurídico y lo antijurídico. Luego de estudiar estas tres dimensiones, el autor concluye que la ontología jurídica de Romano queda a reparo de toda excedencia teológico-política. Universidad Nacional de Rosario 2022-07-22 info:eu-repo/semantics/article info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion application/pdf https://perspectivasrcs.unr.edu.ar/index.php/PRCS/article/view/575 10.35305/prcs.v7i13.575 Perspectivas Revista de Ciencias Sociales; Vol. 7 No. 13 (2022): Perspectivas Revista de Ciencias Sociales No. 13 Enero-Junio 2022; 7 - 23 Perspectivas Revista de Ciencias Sociales; Vol. 7 Núm. 13 (2022): Perspectivas Revista de Ciencias Sociales No. 13 Enero-Junio 2022; 7 - 23 2525-1112 spa https://perspectivasrcs.unr.edu.ar/index.php/PRCS/article/view/575/319 Derechos de autor 2022 Autor https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/4.0/deed.es
institution Universidad Nacional de Rosario
institution_str I-15
repository_str R-203
container_title_str Perspectivas – Revista de Ciencias Sociales
language Español
format Artículo revista
topic Institutionalism
Political Theology
Constituent Power
Carl Schmitt
Santi Romano
Institucionalismo
Teología Política
Poder Constituyente
Carl Schmitt
Santi Romano
spellingShingle Institutionalism
Political Theology
Constituent Power
Carl Schmitt
Santi Romano
Institucionalismo
Teología Política
Poder Constituyente
Carl Schmitt
Santi Romano
Esposito, Roberto
Institutional turn: Carl Schmitt or Santi Romano?
topic_facet Institutionalism
Political Theology
Constituent Power
Carl Schmitt
Santi Romano
Institucionalismo
Teología Política
Poder Constituyente
Carl Schmitt
Santi Romano
author Esposito, Roberto
author_facet Esposito, Roberto
author_sort Esposito, Roberto
title Institutional turn: Carl Schmitt or Santi Romano?
title_short Institutional turn: Carl Schmitt or Santi Romano?
title_full Institutional turn: Carl Schmitt or Santi Romano?
title_fullStr Institutional turn: Carl Schmitt or Santi Romano?
title_full_unstemmed Institutional turn: Carl Schmitt or Santi Romano?
title_sort institutional turn: carl schmitt or santi romano?
description The article analyzes the problem of institutionalism in the work of Carl Schmitt and Santi Romano from the perspective of the critique of political theology. The author argues that it is a difficult operation due to the deep roots of political theology in the constitution of the modern political lexicon. Next, it probably reconstructs the controversy between Schmitt and Benjamin on political theology and then examines the problematic of constituent power in Schmitt's work and in the contemporary philosophical-political debate. After penetrating into schmittian institutionalism and its commitments to the Nazi regime, arguing that Schmitt will not come out of decisionist monism losing all innovative analytical potential in the field of institutionalism. Finally, the author delves into Romano's institutionalist thought, highlighting the relationship between law and its "outside" in three dimensions: the non-legal, the pre-legal and the anti-legal. After studying these three dimensions, the author concludes that Romano's legal ontology is protected from any theological-political excess
publisher Universidad Nacional de Rosario
publishDate 2022
url https://perspectivasrcs.unr.edu.ar/index.php/PRCS/article/view/575
work_keys_str_mv AT espositoroberto institutionalturncarlschmittorsantiromano
AT espositoroberto institutionalturncarlschmittosantiromano
first_indexed 2023-05-11T18:45:26Z
last_indexed 2023-05-11T18:45:26Z
_version_ 1765624487551696896

Ejemplares similares