All for one and one for all? About the right to intervene and obligations erga omnes
In certain cases, States have the power to claim before an international jurisdiction when another State fails to fulfill an erga omnes obligation. Such action, focused on ensuring that the infringing State ceases its illegal attitude, is usually done "in the name of the international community...
Guardado en:
| Autor principal: | |
|---|---|
| Formato: | Artículo revista |
| Lenguaje: | Español |
| Publicado: |
Universidad Nacional de Rosario
2017
|
| Materias: | |
| Acceso en línea: | https://perspectivasrcs.unr.edu.ar/index.php/PRCS/article/view/347 |
| Aporte de: |
| id |
I15-R203-article-347 |
|---|---|
| record_format |
ojs |
| spelling |
I15-R203-article-3472022-07-09T04:18:49Z All for one and one for all? About the right to intervene and obligations erga omnes Todos para uno y ¿uno para todos? Acerca del derecho a intervenir y las obligaciones erga omnes Odriozola, Ignacio Obligations erga omnes Principle of non-interference International jurisdictions Right to intervene Obligaciones erga omnes Principio de no injerencia Jurisdicciones internacionales Derecho a intervenir In certain cases, States have the power to claim before an international jurisdiction when another State fails to fulfill an erga omnes obligation. Such action, focused on ensuring that the infringing State ceases its illegal attitude, is usually done "in the name of the international community". However, in carrying out this kind of action, it is inevitable to suppose that there is a collision between the faculty of intervention of the claimant State to redress the offender in the context of his obligations, and the right not to intervene in the domestic affairs of a sovereign State, which disallows any intrusion in the territory of another. Initially, the present work will try to answer if the formulation of these claims could represent (or not) a violation of the Principle of non-interference established in art. 2.7 of the Charter of the United Nations. Next, we will explore whether the States - on behalf of third parties or represented by third parties - have come to different international jurisdictions, to assert their objection, while we will examine the response provided by the jurisdiction to which it was addressed. Finally I will offer some final thoughts. En ciertos casos, los Estados tienen la facultad de reclamar ante una sede jurisdiccional internacional cuando otro Estado incumple una obligación erga omnes. Tal acción, centrada en lograr que el Estado infractor cese su inobservancia, suele hacerse en “nombre de la comunidad internacional”. Sin embargo, al llevar adelante esta clase de acciones es inevitable suponer la colisión entre la potestad de intervenir del Estado reclamante, que intentará reencausar al infractor en el marco de sus obligaciones, y el principio de no injerencia en los asuntos internos del Estado soberano, que desautoriza toda intrusión en territorio ajeno. Inicialmente, el presente trabajo intentará resolver si la formulación de estos reclamos podría representar (o no) una vulneración del Principio de no injerencia previsto en el art. 2.7 de la Carta de Naciones Unidas. Seguidamente, exploraremos si los Estados –a nombre de terceros o representados por terceros- han acudido a diferentes jurisdicciones internacionales, para hacer valer su objeción, mientras que examinaremos cuál ha sido la respuesta brindada por la jurisdicción a la cual se acudió. Finalmente ofreceré unas reflexiones finales. Universidad Nacional de Rosario 2017-12-26 info:eu-repo/semantics/article info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion Convocatoria por invitación application/pdf https://perspectivasrcs.unr.edu.ar/index.php/PRCS/article/view/347 10.35305/prcs.v0i4.347 Perspectivas Revista de Ciencias Sociales; Vol. 2 No. 4 (2017): Perspectivas Revista de Ciencias Sociales No. 4 Julio-Diciembre 2017; 243-263 Perspectivas Revista de Ciencias Sociales; Vol. 2 Núm. 4 (2017): Perspectivas Revista de Ciencias Sociales No. 4 Julio-Diciembre 2017; 243-263 2525-1112 spa https://perspectivasrcs.unr.edu.ar/index.php/PRCS/article/view/347/215 Derechos de autor 2017 Autor |
| institution |
Universidad Nacional de Rosario |
| institution_str |
I-15 |
| repository_str |
R-203 |
| container_title_str |
Perspectivas – Revista de Ciencias Sociales |
| language |
Español |
| format |
Artículo revista |
| topic |
Obligations erga omnes Principle of non-interference International jurisdictions Right to intervene Obligaciones erga omnes Principio de no injerencia Jurisdicciones internacionales Derecho a intervenir |
| spellingShingle |
Obligations erga omnes Principle of non-interference International jurisdictions Right to intervene Obligaciones erga omnes Principio de no injerencia Jurisdicciones internacionales Derecho a intervenir Odriozola, Ignacio All for one and one for all? About the right to intervene and obligations erga omnes |
| topic_facet |
Obligations erga omnes Principle of non-interference International jurisdictions Right to intervene Obligaciones erga omnes Principio de no injerencia Jurisdicciones internacionales Derecho a intervenir |
| author |
Odriozola, Ignacio |
| author_facet |
Odriozola, Ignacio |
| author_sort |
Odriozola, Ignacio |
| title |
All for one and one for all? About the right to intervene and obligations erga omnes |
| title_short |
All for one and one for all? About the right to intervene and obligations erga omnes |
| title_full |
All for one and one for all? About the right to intervene and obligations erga omnes |
| title_fullStr |
All for one and one for all? About the right to intervene and obligations erga omnes |
| title_full_unstemmed |
All for one and one for all? About the right to intervene and obligations erga omnes |
| title_sort |
all for one and one for all? about the right to intervene and obligations erga omnes |
| description |
In certain cases, States have the power to claim before an international jurisdiction when another State fails to fulfill an erga omnes obligation. Such action, focused on ensuring that the infringing State ceases its illegal attitude, is usually done "in the name of the international community". However, in carrying out this kind of action, it is inevitable to suppose that there is a collision between the faculty of intervention of the claimant State to redress the offender in the context of his obligations, and the right not to intervene in the domestic affairs of a sovereign State, which disallows any intrusion in the territory of another. Initially, the present work will try to answer if the formulation of these claims could represent (or not) a violation of the Principle of non-interference established in art. 2.7 of the Charter of the United Nations. Next, we will explore whether the States - on behalf of third parties or represented by third parties - have come to different international jurisdictions, to assert their objection, while we will examine the response provided by the jurisdiction to which it was addressed. Finally I will offer some final thoughts. |
| publisher |
Universidad Nacional de Rosario |
| publishDate |
2017 |
| url |
https://perspectivasrcs.unr.edu.ar/index.php/PRCS/article/view/347 |
| work_keys_str_mv |
AT odriozolaignacio allforoneandoneforallabouttherighttointerveneandobligationsergaomnes AT odriozolaignacio todosparaunoyunoparatodosacercadelderechoaintervenirylasobligacionesergaomnes |
| first_indexed |
2023-05-11T18:45:10Z |
| last_indexed |
2023-05-11T18:45:10Z |
| _version_ |
1765624470760849408 |