Resistance to the authority and revolution in the seventeenth and eighteenth centuries:: Locke y Kant

Mostrar todas las versiones(2)

The discussion about resistance to authority has strongly resurfaced at the end of the seventeenth century and in the course of eighteenth. This occurred as result of the political climate that existed in England, the North American colonies and France, and also because of the political theory renew...

Descripción completa

Guardado en:
Detalles Bibliográficos
Autor principal: Vendramin, Bruno
Formato: Artículo revista
Lenguaje:Español
Publicado: Universidad Nacional de Rosario 2019
Materias:
Resistance to the authority
Revolution
John Locke
Immanuel Kant
Resistencia a la autoridad
Revolución
Acceso en línea:https://perspectivasrcs.unr.edu.ar/index.php/PRCS/article/view/28
Aporte de:
Perspectivas – Revista de Ciencias Sociales de Universidad Nacional de Rosario
id I15-R203-article-28
record_format ojs
spelling I15-R203-article-282022-07-09T04:19:30Z Resistance to the authority and revolution in the seventeenth and eighteenth centuries:: Locke y Kant Resistencia a la autoridad y revolución en los siglos XVII y XVIII:: Locke y Kant Vendramin, Bruno Resistance to the authority Revolution John Locke Immanuel Kant Resistencia a la autoridad Revolución John Locke Immanuel Kant The discussion about resistance to authority has strongly resurfaced at the end of the seventeenth century and in the course of eighteenth. This occurred as result of the political climate that existed in England, the North American colonies and France, and also because of the political theory renewal that took place during modernity. In this context, Locke and Kant, witnesses of the revolutionary events, wrote extensively on whether it is possible for the people to rise up against unjust orders. Locke philosophically justified the resistance; on the other hand, Kant rejected it forcefully. Firstly, this article develops the thought of Locke about this issue and places it in the English framework at the end of the XVII century and, second, describe the legal philosophy of Kant on this problem, and reconstructs the relation of it with the French Revolution. Finally, we explain the treatment of the French legal texts by the right of resistance, especially the Declaration of the Rights of Man and the Citizen of 1789 and the Citizen of 1789 and the Constitution of the year I of 1793. A fines del siglo XVII, y durante el XVIII, resurgió con fuerza la discusión acerca de la resistencia a la autoridad. Ello se dio a causa del clima político que se vivía en Inglaterra, las colonias norteamericanas y Francia, y por la renovación de la teoría política sucedida en la modernidad. En este escenario, Locke y Kant, testigos principales de los acontecimientos revolucionarios, escribieron in extenso sobre si es posible que el pueblo se subleve ante órdenes injustas. El primero justificó jurídica y filosóficamente la resistencia; por el contrario, Kant la rechazó de manera contundente. El presente artículo desarrolla, en primer lugar, el pensamiento de Locke sobre el derecho de resistencia, y lo sitúa en el contexto inglés de fines del siglo XVII y, en segundo lugar, la filosofía jurídica de Kant sobre el problema, y reconstruye la relación de ella con la Revolución Francesa. Por último, se explica el tratamiento que hicieron del derecho de resistencia los textos jurídicos franceses, en especial la Declaración de Derechos del Hombre y del Ciudadano de 1789, y la Constitución del año I de 1793. Universidad Nacional de Rosario 2019-12-12 info:eu-repo/semantics/article info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion Convocatoria por invitación application/pdf https://perspectivasrcs.unr.edu.ar/index.php/PRCS/article/view/28 10.35305/prcs.v0i7.28 Perspectivas Revista de Ciencias Sociales; Vol. 4 No. 7 (2019): Perspectivas Revista de Ciencias Sociales No. 7 Enero-Junio 2019; 245-262 Perspectivas Revista de Ciencias Sociales; Vol. 4 Núm. 7 (2019): Perspectivas Revista de Ciencias Sociales No. 7 Enero-Junio 2019; 245-262 2525-1112 spa https://perspectivasrcs.unr.edu.ar/index.php/PRCS/article/view/28/20
institution Universidad Nacional de Rosario
institution_str I-15
repository_str R-203
container_title_str Perspectivas – Revista de Ciencias Sociales
language Español
format Artículo revista
topic Resistance to the authority
Revolution
John Locke
Immanuel Kant
Resistencia a la autoridad
Revolución
John Locke
Immanuel Kant
spellingShingle Resistance to the authority
Revolution
John Locke
Immanuel Kant
Resistencia a la autoridad
Revolución
John Locke
Immanuel Kant
Vendramin, Bruno
Resistance to the authority and revolution in the seventeenth and eighteenth centuries:: Locke y Kant
topic_facet Resistance to the authority
Revolution
John Locke
Immanuel Kant
Resistencia a la autoridad
Revolución
John Locke
Immanuel Kant
author Vendramin, Bruno
author_facet Vendramin, Bruno
author_sort Vendramin, Bruno
title Resistance to the authority and revolution in the seventeenth and eighteenth centuries:: Locke y Kant
title_short Resistance to the authority and revolution in the seventeenth and eighteenth centuries:: Locke y Kant
title_full Resistance to the authority and revolution in the seventeenth and eighteenth centuries:: Locke y Kant
title_fullStr Resistance to the authority and revolution in the seventeenth and eighteenth centuries:: Locke y Kant
title_full_unstemmed Resistance to the authority and revolution in the seventeenth and eighteenth centuries:: Locke y Kant
title_sort resistance to the authority and revolution in the seventeenth and eighteenth centuries:: locke y kant
description The discussion about resistance to authority has strongly resurfaced at the end of the seventeenth century and in the course of eighteenth. This occurred as result of the political climate that existed in England, the North American colonies and France, and also because of the political theory renewal that took place during modernity. In this context, Locke and Kant, witnesses of the revolutionary events, wrote extensively on whether it is possible for the people to rise up against unjust orders. Locke philosophically justified the resistance; on the other hand, Kant rejected it forcefully. Firstly, this article develops the thought of Locke about this issue and places it in the English framework at the end of the XVII century and, second, describe the legal philosophy of Kant on this problem, and reconstructs the relation of it with the French Revolution. Finally, we explain the treatment of the French legal texts by the right of resistance, especially the Declaration of the Rights of Man and the Citizen of 1789 and the Citizen of 1789 and the Constitution of the year I of 1793.
publisher Universidad Nacional de Rosario
publishDate 2019
url https://perspectivasrcs.unr.edu.ar/index.php/PRCS/article/view/28
work_keys_str_mv AT vendraminbruno resistancetotheauthorityandrevolutionintheseventeenthandeighteenthcenturieslockeykant
AT vendraminbruno resistenciaalaautoridadyrevolucionenlossiglosxviiyxviiilockeykant
first_indexed 2023-05-11T18:44:45Z
last_indexed 2023-05-11T18:44:45Z
_version_ 1765624445278355456

Ejemplares similares