Thinking another epistemology:: critics and reviews of the Social Science’s epistemologic paradigm in Immanuel Wallerstein and Boaventura de Sousa Santos

Mostrar todas las versiones(2)

This paper aims to reconstruct Immanuel Wallerstein and Boaventura de Sousa Santos critics towards the way Modern Social Sciences were constructed, and theoretical assumptions they lie upon. Picking up aspects of the critics to the hegemonic epistemological paradigm some authors initiated in the mid...

Descripción completa

Guardado en:
Detalles Bibliográficos
Autor principal: Beckmann, Erika
Formato: Artículo revista
Lenguaje:Español
Publicado: Universidad Nacional de Rosario 2016
Materias:
Epistemological critic
Social sciences
Knowledges ecology
Epistemología crítica
Ciencias Sociales
Ecología de Saberes
Acceso en línea:https://perspectivasrcs.unr.edu.ar/index.php/PRCS/article/view/266
Aporte de:
Perspectivas – Revista de Ciencias Sociales de Universidad Nacional de Rosario
id I15-R203-article-266
record_format ojs
spelling I15-R203-article-2662022-07-09T04:18:22Z Thinking another epistemology:: critics and reviews of the Social Science’s epistemologic paradigm in Immanuel Wallerstein and Boaventura de Sousa Santos Para pensar otra epistemología:: críticas y revisiones al paradigma epistemológico de las Ciencias Sociales en Immanuel Wallerstein y Boaventura de Sousa Santos Beckmann, Erika Epistemological critic Social sciences Knowledges ecology Epistemología crítica Ciencias Sociales Ecología de Saberes This paper aims to reconstruct Immanuel Wallerstein and Boaventura de Sousa Santos critics towards the way Modern Social Sciences were constructed, and theoretical assumptions they lie upon. Picking up aspects of the critics to the hegemonic epistemological paradigm some authors initiated in the mid-20th century, they propose new facets and challenges to think the reconstruction of Social Sciences, based upon parameters connected to their historical conformation processes, the social subjects who are their protagonists (with their own interests and power disputes), and their philosophical and methodological plurality. Both conceive Science not as a hierarchic knowledge superior to others, but as a specific form of knowledge –which importance can’t be denied-, but that coexists with other forms of knowledge that we can and should respect, and that originate social practices, define cultures and produce knowledge. This does not imply to reject or relegate social sciences, but to open up to new conceptions and methodologies on the one hand, and to a democratic dialogue with other forms of knowing and of producing knowledge on the other. El artículo se propone reconstruir las críticas que Immanuel Wallerstein y Boaventura de Sousa Santos realizan al modo en que se han construido y los supuestos sobre los que se asientan las Ciencias Sociales modernas. Retomando algunos aspectos de las críticas al paradigma epistemológico hegemónico que muchos autores iniciaron a mediados del siglo XX, proponen nuevas aristas y desafíos para pensar la reconstrucción de las Ciencias Sociales desde parámetros vinculados a sus procesos históricos de conformación, los sujetos sociales que los protagonizan (con sus intereses y disputas de poder) y su pluralidad filosófica y  metodológica. Ambos conciben a la ciencia no como un saber de jerarquía superior al resto, sino como una forma particular de conocimiento ─cuya importancia no podemos soslayar─, pero que convive con otras formas de saber que podemos y debemos respetar, y que engendran prácticas sociales, conforman culturas y producen conocimiento. Lo cual no implica la negación ni la relegación de las Ciencias Sociales, sino su apertura a nuevas concepciones y metodologías por un lado, y a un diálogo democrático con otras formas de saber y de producir conocimiento, por el otro. Universidad Nacional de Rosario 2016-12-29 info:eu-repo/semantics/article info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion Convocatoria por invitación application/pdf https://perspectivasrcs.unr.edu.ar/index.php/PRCS/article/view/266 10.35305/prcs.v0i2.266 Perspectivas Revista de Ciencias Sociales; Vol. 1 No. 2 (2016): Perspectivas Revista de Ciencias Sociales No. 2 Julio-Diciembre 2016; 207 - 221 Perspectivas Revista de Ciencias Sociales; Vol. 1 Núm. 2 (2016): Perspectivas Revista de Ciencias Sociales No. 2 Julio-Diciembre 2016; 207 - 221 2525-1112 spa https://perspectivasrcs.unr.edu.ar/index.php/PRCS/article/view/266/164 Derechos de autor 2016 Autor
institution Universidad Nacional de Rosario
institution_str I-15
repository_str R-203
container_title_str Perspectivas – Revista de Ciencias Sociales
language Español
format Artículo revista
topic Epistemological critic
Social sciences
Knowledges ecology
Epistemología crítica
Ciencias Sociales
Ecología de Saberes
spellingShingle Epistemological critic
Social sciences
Knowledges ecology
Epistemología crítica
Ciencias Sociales
Ecología de Saberes
Beckmann, Erika
Thinking another epistemology:: critics and reviews of the Social Science’s epistemologic paradigm in Immanuel Wallerstein and Boaventura de Sousa Santos
topic_facet Epistemological critic
Social sciences
Knowledges ecology
Epistemología crítica
Ciencias Sociales
Ecología de Saberes
author Beckmann, Erika
author_facet Beckmann, Erika
author_sort Beckmann, Erika
title Thinking another epistemology:: critics and reviews of the Social Science’s epistemologic paradigm in Immanuel Wallerstein and Boaventura de Sousa Santos
title_short Thinking another epistemology:: critics and reviews of the Social Science’s epistemologic paradigm in Immanuel Wallerstein and Boaventura de Sousa Santos
title_full Thinking another epistemology:: critics and reviews of the Social Science’s epistemologic paradigm in Immanuel Wallerstein and Boaventura de Sousa Santos
title_fullStr Thinking another epistemology:: critics and reviews of the Social Science’s epistemologic paradigm in Immanuel Wallerstein and Boaventura de Sousa Santos
title_full_unstemmed Thinking another epistemology:: critics and reviews of the Social Science’s epistemologic paradigm in Immanuel Wallerstein and Boaventura de Sousa Santos
title_sort thinking another epistemology:: critics and reviews of the social science’s epistemologic paradigm in immanuel wallerstein and boaventura de sousa santos
description This paper aims to reconstruct Immanuel Wallerstein and Boaventura de Sousa Santos critics towards the way Modern Social Sciences were constructed, and theoretical assumptions they lie upon. Picking up aspects of the critics to the hegemonic epistemological paradigm some authors initiated in the mid-20th century, they propose new facets and challenges to think the reconstruction of Social Sciences, based upon parameters connected to their historical conformation processes, the social subjects who are their protagonists (with their own interests and power disputes), and their philosophical and methodological plurality. Both conceive Science not as a hierarchic knowledge superior to others, but as a specific form of knowledge –which importance can’t be denied-, but that coexists with other forms of knowledge that we can and should respect, and that originate social practices, define cultures and produce knowledge. This does not imply to reject or relegate social sciences, but to open up to new conceptions and methodologies on the one hand, and to a democratic dialogue with other forms of knowing and of producing knowledge on the other.
publisher Universidad Nacional de Rosario
publishDate 2016
url https://perspectivasrcs.unr.edu.ar/index.php/PRCS/article/view/266
work_keys_str_mv AT beckmannerika thinkinganotherepistemologycriticsandreviewsofthesocialsciencesepistemologicparadigminimmanuelwallersteinandboaventuradesousasantos
AT beckmannerika parapensarotraepistemologiacriticasyrevisionesalparadigmaepistemologicodelascienciassocialesenimmanuelwallersteinyboaventuradesousasantos
first_indexed 2023-05-11T18:45:01Z
last_indexed 2023-05-11T18:45:01Z
_version_ 1765624461963296768

Ejemplares similares