The relationship between law and morality, a legal-philosophical question without a solution? A reading of the Alexy-Bulygin debate from classical legal realism

Between two of the greatest exponents of current legal philosophy, Robert Alexy and Eugenio Bulygin, a debate took place around the concept of law and the relationship between law and morality. The first expounded the non-positivist thesis that there is a necessary conceptual relationship between bo...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autor principal: Fernández Peralta, Marcelo
Formato: Artículo revista
Lenguaje:Español
Publicado: Centro de Estudios de Filosofía Clásica, Instituto de Filosofía, Facultad de Filosofía y Letras, Universidad Nacional de Cuyo 2024
Materias:
Alexy
Bulygin
iusfilosofía
San Agustín
Aristóteles
Santo Tomás
iusphilosophy
Saint Augustine
Aristotle
Saint Thomas
Acceso en línea:https://revistas.uncu.edu.ar/ojs3/index.php/opusculo/article/view/8286
Aporte de:
Opúsculo filosófico de Universidad Nacional de Cuyo
id I11-R97-article-8286
record_format ojs
spelling I11-R97-article-82862024-11-04T17:03:27Z The relationship between law and morality, a legal-philosophical question without a solution? A reading of the Alexy-Bulygin debate from classical legal realism La relación entre derecho y moral, ¿cuestión iusfilosófica sin solución? Una lectura del debate Alexy-Bulygin desde el realismo jurídico clásico Fernández Peralta, Marcelo Alexy Bulygin iusfilosofía San Agustín Aristóteles Santo Tomás Alexy Bulygin iusphilosophy Saint Augustine Aristotle Saint Thomas Between two of the greatest exponents of current legal philosophy, Robert Alexy and Eugenio Bulygin, a debate took place around the concept of law and the relationship between law and morality. The first expounded the non-positivist thesis that there is a necessary conceptual relationship between both regulatory orders of human behavior. For his part, the professor at the University of Buenos Aires, co-author of “Normative Systems”, consistent with his legal positivist position, denied that such a link exists, placing emphasis on criticizing the argument of the claim for correction. This work aims to make a critical reading of both positions in light of the natural law conception of law presented by classical legal realism. It is noted that despite the clarity and forcefulness of the arguments expressed by both authors, in their debate there remain unanswered questions whose answers we could find from a thorough study of the classical texts of Saint Augustine, Aristotle and Saint Thomas. Entre dos de los mayores exponentes de la iusfilosofía actual, Robert Alexy y Eugenio Bulygin, se produjo un debate en torno al concepto del derecho y la relación entre derecho y moral. El primero expuso la tesis no positivista de que existe una relación conceptual necesaria entre ambos órdenes reguladores de la conducta humana. Por su parte, el profesor de la Universidad de Buenos Aires coautor de “Normative Systems”, consecuente con su postura iuspositivista, negó que exista tal vinculación poniendo énfasis en criticar el argumento de la pretensión de corrección. Este trabajo pretende hacer una lectura crítica de ambas posturas a la luz de la concepción iusnaturalista del derecho que presenta el realismo jurídico clásico. Se advierte que no obstante la claridad y contundencia de los argumentos vertidos por ambos autores, en su debate quedan preguntas sin responder cuyas respuestas podríamos encontrar a partir de un estudio minucioso de los textos clásicos de San Agustín, Aristóteles y Santo Tomás. Centro de Estudios de Filosofía Clásica, Instituto de Filosofía, Facultad de Filosofía y Letras, Universidad Nacional de Cuyo 2024-11-04 info:eu-repo/semantics/article info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion Artículo evaluado por pares application/pdf https://revistas.uncu.edu.ar/ojs3/index.php/opusculo/article/view/8286 Opúsculo filosófico; Núm. 38 (2024); 42-52 2422-8125 1852-0596 spa https://revistas.uncu.edu.ar/ojs3/index.php/opusculo/article/view/8286/6842 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/
institution Universidad Nacional de Cuyo
institution_str I-11
repository_str R-97
container_title_str Opúsculo filosófico
language Español
format Artículo revista
topic Alexy
Bulygin
iusfilosofía
San Agustín
Aristóteles
Santo Tomás
Alexy
Bulygin
iusphilosophy
Saint Augustine
Aristotle
Saint Thomas
spellingShingle Alexy
Bulygin
iusfilosofía
San Agustín
Aristóteles
Santo Tomás
Alexy
Bulygin
iusphilosophy
Saint Augustine
Aristotle
Saint Thomas
Fernández Peralta, Marcelo
The relationship between law and morality, a legal-philosophical question without a solution? A reading of the Alexy-Bulygin debate from classical legal realism
topic_facet Alexy
Bulygin
iusfilosofía
San Agustín
Aristóteles
Santo Tomás
Alexy
Bulygin
iusphilosophy
Saint Augustine
Aristotle
Saint Thomas
author Fernández Peralta, Marcelo
author_facet Fernández Peralta, Marcelo
author_sort Fernández Peralta, Marcelo
title The relationship between law and morality, a legal-philosophical question without a solution? A reading of the Alexy-Bulygin debate from classical legal realism
title_short The relationship between law and morality, a legal-philosophical question without a solution? A reading of the Alexy-Bulygin debate from classical legal realism
title_full The relationship between law and morality, a legal-philosophical question without a solution? A reading of the Alexy-Bulygin debate from classical legal realism
title_fullStr The relationship between law and morality, a legal-philosophical question without a solution? A reading of the Alexy-Bulygin debate from classical legal realism
title_full_unstemmed The relationship between law and morality, a legal-philosophical question without a solution? A reading of the Alexy-Bulygin debate from classical legal realism
title_sort relationship between law and morality, a legal-philosophical question without a solution? a reading of the alexy-bulygin debate from classical legal realism
description Between two of the greatest exponents of current legal philosophy, Robert Alexy and Eugenio Bulygin, a debate took place around the concept of law and the relationship between law and morality. The first expounded the non-positivist thesis that there is a necessary conceptual relationship between both regulatory orders of human behavior. For his part, the professor at the University of Buenos Aires, co-author of “Normative Systems”, consistent with his legal positivist position, denied that such a link exists, placing emphasis on criticizing the argument of the claim for correction. This work aims to make a critical reading of both positions in light of the natural law conception of law presented by classical legal realism. It is noted that despite the clarity and forcefulness of the arguments expressed by both authors, in their debate there remain unanswered questions whose answers we could find from a thorough study of the classical texts of Saint Augustine, Aristotle and Saint Thomas.
publisher Centro de Estudios de Filosofía Clásica, Instituto de Filosofía, Facultad de Filosofía y Letras, Universidad Nacional de Cuyo
publishDate 2024
url https://revistas.uncu.edu.ar/ojs3/index.php/opusculo/article/view/8286
work_keys_str_mv AT fernandezperaltamarcelo therelationshipbetweenlawandmoralityalegalphilosophicalquestionwithoutasolutionareadingofthealexybulygindebatefromclassicallegalrealism
AT fernandezperaltamarcelo larelacionentrederechoymoralcuestioniusfilosoficasinsolucionunalecturadeldebatealexybulygindesdeelrealismojuridicoclasico
AT fernandezperaltamarcelo relationshipbetweenlawandmoralityalegalphilosophicalquestionwithoutasolutionareadingofthealexybulygindebatefromclassicallegalrealism
first_indexed 2025-02-05T22:34:24Z
last_indexed 2025-02-05T22:34:24Z
_version_ 1823258563796008960

Ejemplares similares