A dictatorship in the form of a law. Anti-Peronists reviews after Perón’s triumph (1946-1948)
After Perón’s triumph in 1946 election, the opposing forces tried to explain its unexpected defeat. The favorite interpretation was based on the so-called "pre-electoral fraud", which they understood as demagogic cooptation of the masses and as an inequitable distribution of resources betw...
Guardado en:
| Autor principal: | |
|---|---|
| Formato: | Artículo revista |
| Lenguaje: | Español |
| Publicado: |
Facultad de Filosofía y Humanidades. Escuela de Historia
2017
|
| Materias: | |
| Acceso en línea: | https://revistas.unc.edu.ar/index.php/anuariohistoria/article/view/18814 |
| Aporte de: |
| Sumario: | After Perón’s triumph in 1946 election, the opposing forces tried to explain its unexpected defeat. The favorite interpretation was based on the so-called "pre-electoral fraud", which they understood as demagogic cooptation of the masses and as an inequitable distribution of resources between government and opposition. Although they tacitly admitted the legal character of the flaming government, anti-Peronist forces claimed that the legitimacy of origin of the president was seriously damaged. In that sense, this paper reviews the positions of the main anti-Peronist forces during Perón's first two years in power. |
|---|