A dictatorship in the form of a law. Anti-Peronists reviews after Perón’s triumph (1946-1948)

After Perón’s triumph in 1946 election, the opposing forces tried to explain its unexpected defeat. The favorite interpretation was based on the so-called "pre-electoral fraud", which they understood as demagogic cooptation of the masses and as an inequitable distribution of resources betw...

Descripción completa

Guardado en:
Detalles Bibliográficos
Autor principal: Pizzorno, Pablo
Formato: Artículo revista
Lenguaje:Español
Publicado: Facultad de Filosofía y Humanidades. Escuela de Historia 2017
Materias:
Antiperonism
Radical Civic Union
Socialist Party
Communist Party
Antiperonismo
Unión Cívica Radical
Partido Socialista
Partido Comunista
Acceso en línea:https://revistas.unc.edu.ar/index.php/anuariohistoria/article/view/18814
Aporte de:
Anuario de la Escuela de Historia Virtual de Universidad Nacional de Córdoba
id I10-R362-article-18814
record_format ojs
spelling I10-R362-article-188142017-12-12T22:02:38Z A dictatorship in the form of a law. Anti-Peronists reviews after Perón’s triumph (1946-1948) Una dictadura con forma de ley. Lecturas antiperonistas tras el triunfo de Perón (1946-1948) Pizzorno, Pablo Antiperonism Radical Civic Union Socialist Party Communist Party Antiperonismo Unión Cívica Radical Partido Socialista Partido Comunista After Perón’s triumph in 1946 election, the opposing forces tried to explain its unexpected defeat. The favorite interpretation was based on the so-called "pre-electoral fraud", which they understood as demagogic cooptation of the masses and as an inequitable distribution of resources between government and opposition. Although they tacitly admitted the legal character of the flaming government, anti-Peronist forces claimed that the legitimacy of origin of the president was seriously damaged. In that sense, this paper reviews the positions of the main anti-Peronist forces during Perón's first two years in power. Tras el triunfo de Perón en las elecciones de 1946, las fuerzas opositoras intentaron dar una explicación de su inesperada derrota. La interpretación predilecta se basó en el llamado “fraude preelectoral”, entendido como cooptación demagógica de las masas y como distribución inequitativa de recursos entre oficialismo y oposición. De allí surgiría una caracterización que, si bien tácitamente admitía el carácter legal del flamante gobierno, afirmaba que su legitimidad de origen nacía gravemente herida. En ese sentido, este trabajo repasa los posicionamientos de las principales fuerzas antiperonistas durante los primeros dos años de Perón en el poder. Facultad de Filosofía y Humanidades. Escuela de Historia 2017-12-12 info:eu-repo/semantics/article info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion application/pdf https://revistas.unc.edu.ar/index.php/anuariohistoria/article/view/18814 10.31049/1853.7049.v0.n12.18814 Anuario de la Escuela de Historia Virtual; Núm. 12 (2017); 108-129 1853-7049 10.31049/1853.7049.v0.n12 spa https://revistas.unc.edu.ar/index.php/anuariohistoria/article/view/18814/18672 Derechos de autor 2017 Pablo Pizzorno
institution Universidad Nacional de Córdoba
institution_str I-10
repository_str R-362
container_title_str Anuario de la Escuela de Historia Virtual
language Español
format Artículo revista
topic Antiperonism
Radical Civic Union
Socialist Party
Communist Party
Antiperonismo
Unión Cívica Radical
Partido Socialista
Partido Comunista
spellingShingle Antiperonism
Radical Civic Union
Socialist Party
Communist Party
Antiperonismo
Unión Cívica Radical
Partido Socialista
Partido Comunista
Pizzorno, Pablo
A dictatorship in the form of a law. Anti-Peronists reviews after Perón’s triumph (1946-1948)
topic_facet Antiperonism
Radical Civic Union
Socialist Party
Communist Party
Antiperonismo
Unión Cívica Radical
Partido Socialista
Partido Comunista
author Pizzorno, Pablo
author_facet Pizzorno, Pablo
author_sort Pizzorno, Pablo
title A dictatorship in the form of a law. Anti-Peronists reviews after Perón’s triumph (1946-1948)
title_short A dictatorship in the form of a law. Anti-Peronists reviews after Perón’s triumph (1946-1948)
title_full A dictatorship in the form of a law. Anti-Peronists reviews after Perón’s triumph (1946-1948)
title_fullStr A dictatorship in the form of a law. Anti-Peronists reviews after Perón’s triumph (1946-1948)
title_full_unstemmed A dictatorship in the form of a law. Anti-Peronists reviews after Perón’s triumph (1946-1948)
title_sort dictatorship in the form of a law. anti-peronists reviews after perón’s triumph (1946-1948)
description After Perón’s triumph in 1946 election, the opposing forces tried to explain its unexpected defeat. The favorite interpretation was based on the so-called "pre-electoral fraud", which they understood as demagogic cooptation of the masses and as an inequitable distribution of resources between government and opposition. Although they tacitly admitted the legal character of the flaming government, anti-Peronist forces claimed that the legitimacy of origin of the president was seriously damaged. In that sense, this paper reviews the positions of the main anti-Peronist forces during Perón's first two years in power.
publisher Facultad de Filosofía y Humanidades. Escuela de Historia
publishDate 2017
url https://revistas.unc.edu.ar/index.php/anuariohistoria/article/view/18814
work_keys_str_mv AT pizzornopablo adictatorshipintheformofalawantiperonistsreviewsafterperonstriumph19461948
AT pizzornopablo unadictaduraconformadeleylecturasantiperonistastraseltriunfodeperon19461948
AT pizzornopablo dictatorshipintheformofalawantiperonistsreviewsafterperonstriumph19461948
first_indexed 2024-09-03T22:29:08Z
last_indexed 2024-09-03T22:29:08Z
_version_ 1809215703196106752

Ejemplares similares